LCCA and environmental LCA for highway pavement selection in Colorado

The roadway network in the USA earned a grade of D representing poor condition in the latest report card from the American Society of Civil Engineers. To maintain economic and environmental sustainability during the roadway network development and rehabilitation, it is critical to apply sustainable materials and intelligent design. A good estimation on project-level life-cycle costs and environmental impacts is one of the important steps in the highway investment decision-making process. This article examines the current life-cycle cost analysis (LCCA) practice employed by the Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) in their pavement investment decision-making process, and proposes a regional environmental life-cycle assessment (LCA) model to evaluate the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions associated with Colorado highway pavements. Both LCCA and LCA are performed for a highway reconstruction project with Portland cement concrete pavement (PCCP) and hot-mixed asphalt (HMA) alternatives. The LCCA is 7.4% in favour of HMA. Since the difference is less than 10%, it indicates equivalent designs. However, in the LCA, the GHG emission from PCCP is 26% less than the HMA over the 40-year analysis period. The vehicle fuel consumption will increase due to the deterioration of pavements. But the increased user cost is not included in the current LCCA employed by CDOT as well as user cost due to crashes and nonuser costs. The LCA can be an optional criterion for the selection of the preliminary pavement type.

[1]  John P. Zaniewski,et al.  VEHICLE OPERATING COSTS, FUEL CONSUMPTION, AND PAVEMENT TYPE AND CONDITION FACTORS , 1982 .

[2]  W D Paterson.  The highway design and maintenance standards study volume 3: HDM-3 - prediction of road deterioration and maintenance effects: theory and quantification. draft , 1985 .

[3]  Stephan A. Durham,et al.  Optimization of Cementitious Material Content for Sustainable Concrete Mixtures , 2012 .

[4]  Amlan Mukherjee,et al.  Calculation of Greenhouse Gas Emissions for Highway Construction Operations by Using a Hybrid Life-Cycle Assessment Approach: Case Study for Pavement Operations , 2011 .

[5]  Mike Southern,et al.  LIFE CYCLE INVENTORY: BITUMEN , 2012 .

[6]  K Close,et al.  AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF STATE HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION OFFICIALS COMPUTER SYSTEMS INDEX , 1976 .

[7]  Paul Kivi,et al.  Life Cycle Cost Analysis for Pavements , 1997 .

[8]  Robert I. Carr.  CONSTRUCTION CONGESTION COST (CO3) BASIC MODEL , 2000 .

[9]  Life-Cycle Cost Analysis Primer , 2002 .

[10]  Gregory A. Keoleian,et al.  Evaluation of Life-Cycle Cost Analysis Practices Used by the Michigan Department of Transportation , 2008 .

[11]  Mark Reiner.  Technology, environment, resource and policy assessment of sustainable concrete in urban infrastructure , 2007 .

[12]  S Waalkes,et al.  LIFE CYCLE COST ANALYSIS OF PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE PAVEMENTS , 2001 .

[13]  Arpad Horvath,et al.  Comparison of Environmental Implications of Asphalt and Steel-Reinforced Concrete Pavements , 1998 .

[14]  William D O Paterson,et al.  SUMMARY MODELS OF PAVED ROAD DETERIORATION BASED ON HDM-III , 1992 .

[15]  Mitja Jurgele.  Life cycle cost analysis in pavement design , 2013 .

[16]  A. Boyd.  The United States department of transportation , 1968 .

[17]  C M Dewald,et al.  USE OF HIGHWAY NETWORK LEVEL DATA FOR A PROJECT LIFE CYCLE ANALYSIS , 1998 .

[18]  A W Oliver.  TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS OPERATION IN TEXAS. IN: 1991 AASHTO ANNUAL MEETING PROCEEDINGS. SELECTED COMMITTEE MEETING PAPERS PRESENTED AT THE SEVENTY-SEVENTH ANNUAL MEETING OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF STATE HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION OFFICIALS IN MILWAUKEE, WISCONSIN OCTOBER 11-15, 1991 , 1991 .

[19]  Koji Tsunokawa,et al.  The highway design and maintenance standards model. volumes 1 and 2 , 1987 .

[20]  John A. Gambatese,et al.  Energy Consumption of Asphalt and Reinforced Concrete Pavement Materials and Construction , 2005 .

[21]  Anant D Vyas,et al.  VISION Model : description of model used to estimate the impact of highway vehicle technologies and fuels on energy use and carbon emissions to 2050. , 2004 .

[22]  Arthur Wai-Cheung Chan.  Economic and Environmental Evaluations of Life-Cycle Cost Analysis Practice: A Case Study of Michigan DOT Pavement Projects , 2007 .

[23]  Stacy Cagle Davis,et al.  Transportation energy data book , 2008 .

[24]  Michael D. Lepech,et al.  Dynamic Life-Cycle Modeling of Pavement Overlay Systems: Capturing the Impacts of Users, Construction, and Roadway Deterioration , 2010 .

[25]  Mehdi Akbarian,et al.  Methods, Impacts, and Opportunities in the Concrete Pavement Life Cycle , 2011 .

[26]  R B Leahy,et al.  WESTRACK—THE ROAD TO PERFORMANCE-RELATED SPECIFICATIONS , 2000 .