Skin movement artefact assessment and compensation in the estimation of knee-joint kinematics.

In three dimensional (3-D) human movement analysis using close-range photogrammetry, surface marker clusters deform and rigidly move relative to the underlying bone. This introduces an important artefact (skin movement artefact) which propagates to bone position and orientation and joint kinematics estimates. This occurs to the extent that those joint attitude components that undergo small variations result in totally unreliable values. This paper presents an experimental and analytical procedure, to be included in a subject-specific movement analysis protocol, which allows for the assessment of skin movement artefacts and, based on this knowledge, for their compensation. The effectiveness of this procedure was verified with reference to knee-joint kinematics and to the artefacts caused by the hip movements on markers located on the thigh surface. Quantitative validation was achieved through experimental paradigms whereby prior reliable information on the target joint kinematics was available. When position and orientation of bones were determined during the execution of a motor task, using a least-squares optimal estimator, but the rigid artefactual marker cluster movement was not dealt with, then knee joint translations and rotations were affected by root mean square errors (r.m.s.) up to 14 mm and 6 degrees, respectively. When the rigid artefactual movement was also compensated for, then r.m.s errors were reduced to less than 4 mm and 3 degrees, respectively. In addition, errors originally strongly correlated with hip rotations, after compensation, lost this correlation.

[1]  A Leardini,et al.  Position and orientation in space of bones during movement: anatomical frame definition and determination. , 1995, Clinical biomechanics.

[2]  U.D. Croce,et al.  Surface-marker cluster design criteria for 3-D bone movement reconstruction , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[3]  P R Cavanagh,et al.  Three-dimensional kinematics of the human knee during walking. , 1992, Journal of biomechanics.

[4]  F. Veldpaus,et al.  A least-squares algorithm for the equiform transformation from spatial marker co-ordinates. , 1988, Journal of biomechanics.

[5]  G. R. Pennock,et al.  An anatomy-based coordinate system for the description of the kinematic displacements in the human knee. , 1990, Journal of biomechanics.

[6]  Aurelio Cappozzo,et al.  Gait analysis methodology , 1984 .

[7]  A Leardini,et al.  Position and orientation in space of bones during movement: experimental artefacts. , 1996, Clinical biomechanics.

[8]  B. Fregly,et al.  A solidification procedure to facilitate kinematic analyses based on video system data. , 1995, Journal of biomechanics.

[9]  I Söderkvist,et al.  Determining the movements of the skeleton using well-configured markers. , 1993, Journal of biomechanics.

[10]  J. Challis A procedure for determining rigid body transformation parameters. , 1995, Journal of biomechanics.

[11]  J H Challis,et al.  An examination of procedures for determining body segment attitude and position from noisy biomechanical data. , 1995, Medical engineering & physics.

[12]  E S Grood,et al.  A joint coordinate system for the clinical description of three-dimensional motions: application to the knee. , 1983, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[13]  Angelo Cappello,et al.  Multiple anatomical landmark calibration for optimal bone pose estimation , 1997 .

[14]  Tommaso Leo,et al.  Assessment and testing of movement analysis systems: spot checks , 1995 .

[15]  C. Spoor,et al.  Rigid body motion calculated from spatial co-ordinates of markers. , 1980, Journal of biomechanics.