Auditory Induced Bounce Perception Persists as the Probability of a Motion Reversal is Reduced

When two identical targets move toward one another from opposite sides of a display and continue past one another along collinear trajectories, they can be perceived to either stream past or bounce off of one another. Streaming is the dominant perception in motion displays free of additional transients, while bouncing predominates when a transient (eg auditory or visual) is presented at the point of coincidence. We investigated whether the auditory induced bias towards bouncing would persist as the probability of a motion reversal was reduced by introducing a spatial offset either vertically in a 2-D display or in depth in a 3-D display. Offset conditions were combined with two auditory conditions (tone or no-tone at the point of coincidence) in the presence or absence of a central occluder. In conditions with no sound, streaming was reported on a clear majority of trials, regardless of spatial offset. When a transient tone was presented, reported motion reversals dominated and persisted for increasing verbal offsets up to 17.9 min of arc and for 3-D trajectory offsets up to 25.6 min of arc. The bounce-promoting effect of an auditory tone at the point of coincidence in stream/bounce displays persists in spite of rendering the visual motion sequence unambiguous and more consistent with streaming.

[1]  M. Hallett,et al.  Neural correlates of cross-modal binding , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[2]  S Shimojo,et al.  Postcoincidence trajectory duration affects motion event perception , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[3]  D. Lewkowicz,et al.  Sound induces perceptual reorganization of an ambiguous motion display in human infants , 2003 .

[4]  S Shimojo,et al.  Attentional Modulation in Perception of Visual Motion Events , 1998, Perception.

[5]  D Kersten,et al.  Moving Cast Shadows Induce Apparent Motion in Depth , 1997, Perception.

[6]  B I Bertenthal,et al.  Directional Bias in the Perception of Translating Patterns , 1993, Perception.

[7]  Takahiro Kawabe,et al.  Effects of the orientation of moving objects on the perception of streaming/bouncing motion displays , 2006, Perception & psychophysics.

[8]  M. Ernst,et al.  Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion , 2002, Nature.

[9]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[10]  R. Sekuler,et al.  Collisions between Moving Visual Targets: What Controls Alternative Ways of Seeing an Ambiguous Display? , 1999, Perception.

[11]  Laurie M Heller,et al.  Auditory — Visual Interactions in the Perception of a Ball's Path , 2005, Perception.

[12]  Yoshitaka Nakajima,et al.  Audiovisual integration: an investigation of the "streaming-bouncing" phenomenon. , 2004, Journal of physiological anthropology and applied human science.

[13]  Yousuke Kawachi,et al.  Presentation of a Visual Nearby Moving Object Alters Stream/Bounce Event Perception , 2006, Perception.

[14]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[15]  S. Nishida,et al.  Recalibration of audiovisual simultaneity , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[16]  S. Shimojo,et al.  When Sound Affects Vision: Effects of Auditory Grouping on Visual Motion Perception , 2001, Psychological science.

[17]  R. Sekuler,et al.  Sound alters visual motion perception , 1997, Nature.

[18]  M. K. Albert Surface perception and the generic view principle , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[19]  Charles Spence,et al.  Auditory motion affects visual motion perception in a speeded discrimination task , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[20]  Charles Spence,et al.  Bouncing or streaming? Exploring the influence of auditory cues on the interpretation of ambiguous visual motion , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[21]  F A Wichmann,et al.  Ning for Helpful Comments and Suggestions. This Paper Benefited Con- Siderably from Conscientious Peer Review, and We Thank Our Reviewers the Psychometric Function: I. Fitting, Sampling, and Goodness of Fit , 2001 .