A physical model for strain accumulation in the San Francisco Bay Region

SUMMARY Strain accumulation in tectonically active regions is generally a superposition of the effects of background tectonic loading, steady-state dislocation processes, such as creep, and transient deformation. In the San Francisco Bay region (SFBR), the most uncertain of these processes is transient deformation, which arises primarily in association with large earthquakes. As such, it depends upon the history of faulting and the rheology of the crust and mantle, which together determine the pattern of longer term (decade-scale) post-seismic response to earthquakes. We utilize a set of 102 GPS velocity vectors in the SFBR in order to characterize the strain rate field and construct a physical model of its present deformation. We first perform an inversion for the continuous velocity gradient field from the discrete GPS velocity field, from which both tensor strain rate and rotation rate may be extracted. The present strain rate pattern is well described as a nearly uniform shear strain rate oriented approximately N34 ◦ W (140 nanostrain yr −1 ) plus a N56 ◦ E uniaxial compression rate averaging 20 nanostrain yr −1 across the shear zone. We fit the velocity and strain rate fields to a model of time-dependent deformation within a 135-km-wide, arcuate shear zone bounded by strong Pacific Plate and Sierra Nevada block lithosphere to the SW and NE, respectively. Driving forces are purely lateral, consisting of shear zone deformation imposed by the relative motions between the thick Pacific Plate and Sierra Nevada block lithospheres. Assuming a depth-dependent viscoelastic structure within the shear zone, we account for the effects of steady creep on faults and viscoelastic relaxation following the 1906 San Francisco and 1989 Loma Prieta earthquakes, subject to constant velocity boundary conditions on the edges of the shear zone. Fault creep is realized by evaluating dislocations on the creeping portions of faults in the fluid limit of the viscoelastic model. A priori plate-boundary(PB)-parallel motion is set to 38 mm yr −1 .Ag rid search based on fitting the observed strain rate pattern yields a mantle viscosity of 1.2 × 10 19 P as and a PB-perpendicular convergence rate of ∼ 3m m yr −1 . Most of this convergence appears to be uniformly distributed in the Pacific—Sierra Nevada plate boundary zone.

[1]  Strain accumulation rates in the San Francisco Bay area, 1972–1989 , 1998 .

[2]  Fred F. Pollitz,et al.  Joint estimation of afterslip rate and postseismic relaxation following the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake , 1998 .

[3]  Thomas H. Heaton,et al.  Source study of the 1906 San Francisco earthquake , 1993, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[4]  F. Pollitz Post-seismic relaxation theory on a laterally heterogeneous viscoelastic model , 2003 .

[5]  W. Bakun Scenarios for historic San Francisco Bay Region earthquakes , 1998 .

[6]  R. Simpson,et al.  Variations in creep rate along the Hayward Fault, California, interpreted as changes in depth of creep , 2001 .

[7]  J. Tromp,et al.  Theoretical Global Seismology , 1998 .

[8]  W. Thatcher,et al.  Faulting geometry and slip from co-seismic elevation changes: The 18 October 1989, Loma Prieta, California, earthquake , 1991 .

[9]  R. Simpson,et al.  Suppression of large earthquakes by stress shadows: A comparison of Coulomb and rate-and-state failure , 1998 .

[10]  Meghan S. Miller,et al.  Present‐day motion of the Sierra Nevada block and some tectonic implications for the Basin and Range province, North American Cordillera , 2000 .

[11]  F. Pollitz Viscoelastic shear zone model of a strike‐slip earthquake cycle , 2001 .

[12]  Fred F. Pollitz,et al.  Coseismic Deformation From Earthquake Faulting On A Layered Spherical Earth , 1996 .

[13]  W. Spakman,et al.  Inversion of relative motion data for estimates of the velocity gradient field and fault slip , 2002 .

[14]  D. Argus,et al.  Present tectonic motion across the Coast Ranges and San Andreas fault system in central California , 2001 .

[15]  J. Galehouse EFFECT OF THE LOMA PRIETA EARTHQUAKE ON FAULT CREEP RATES IN THE SAN FRANCISCO BAY REGION , 1997 .

[16]  R. Simpson,et al.  Creep Response of the Hayward Fault to Stress Changes Caused by the Loma Prieta Earthquake , 1997 .

[17]  M. Lisowski,et al.  Structural explanation for low creep rates on the San Andreas fault near Monarch Peak, central California , 1984 .

[18]  P. Reasenberg,et al.  Response of Regional Seismicity to the Static Stress Change Produced by the Loma Prieta Earthquake , 1992, Science.

[19]  G. King,et al.  STATIC STRESS CHANGES AND THE TRIGGERING OF EARTHQUAKES , 1994 .

[20]  D. O’Connell,et al.  Source Characterization and Ground-Motion Modeling of the 1892 Vacaville–Winters Earthquake Sequence, California , 2001 .

[21]  Yehuda Ben-Zion,et al.  Large earthquake cycles and intermittent criticality on heterogeneous faults due to evolving stress and seismicity , 2003 .

[22]  Kerry E Sieh,et al.  Slip along the San Andreas fault associated with the great 1857 earthquake , 1984 .

[23]  P. Segall,et al.  Time-dependence of the stress shadowing effect and its relation to the structure of the lower crust , 1999 .

[24]  W. Bakun Seismic activity of the San Francisco Bay region , 1999, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[25]  Lynn R. Sykes,et al.  Evolution of moderate seismicity in the San Francisco Bay region, 1850 to 1993: Seismicity changes related to the occurrence of large and great earthquakes , 1996 .

[26]  D. P. Schwartz,et al.  A Record of Large Earthquakes on the Southern Hayward Fault for the Past 500 Years , 2002 .

[27]  T. J. Powers,et al.  Paleoseismic investigations in the Santa Cruz mountains, California: Implications for recurrence of large‐magnitude earthquakes on the San Andreas Fault , 1998 .

[28]  R. Bürgmann,et al.  Time‐dependent triggered afterslip following the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake , 2000 .

[29]  Alberto Michelini,et al.  Seismological studies at Parkfield. I. Simultaneous inversion for velocity structure and hypocenters using cubic B-splines parameterization , 1991, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[30]  M. Taylor,et al.  Visual and lidar observations of noctilucent clouds above Logan, Utah, at 41.7°N , 2002 .

[31]  W. Menke Geophysical data analysis : discrete inverse theory , 1984 .

[32]  Wayne Thatcher,et al.  Nonlinear strain buildup and the earthquake cycle on the San Andreas Fault , 1983 .

[33]  Fred F. Pollitz,et al.  Gravitational viscoelastic postseismic relaxation on a layered spherical Earth , 1997 .

[34]  Geodetic estimates of fault slip rates in the San Francisco Bay area , 1999 .

[35]  J. C. Savage,et al.  Inferred depth of creep on the Hayward Fault, central California , 1993 .

[36]  W. Bakun,et al.  Slip partitioning of the Calaveras Fault, California, and prospects for future earthquakes , 1990 .

[37]  P. Segall,et al.  Modeling broadscale deformation in northern California and Nevada from plate motions and elastic strain accumulation , 2001 .

[38]  Deformation across the Pacific-North America plate boundary near San Francisco, California , 2001 .

[39]  T. Parsons Post-1906 stress recovery of the San Andreas fault system calculated from three-dimensional finite element analysis , 2002 .

[40]  R. Stein The role of stress transfer in earthquake occurrence , 1999, Nature.

[41]  Wayne Thatcher,et al.  Resolution of fault slip along the 470‐km‐long rupture of the great 1906 San Francisco earthquake and its implications , 1997 .

[42]  James C. Savage,et al.  Strain accumulation across the Coast Ranges at the latitude of San Francisco, 1994–2000 , 2004 .

[43]  D. Eberhart‐Phillips,et al.  Continental subduction and three‐dimensional crustal structure: The northern South Island, New Zealand , 1997 .