A comprehensive approach to handle the dynamics of customer's needs in Quality Function Deployment based on linguistic variables

Article history: Received January 15, 2013 Accepted October 12, 2013 Available online October 19 2013 In the contexture of a customer-driven goods or service design process, a well-timed update of customer’s requirements may not only serve as a necessity indicator to observe how things change over time, but also it incorporates the firms a better ground to interoperate different strategies to meet the future needs of its customer. This paper proposes a systematic methodology to deal with the customer needs’ dynamics, in terms of their relative weights, in the QFD. Compared with previous research, the contribution of this paper is fourfold. First, it applies some linguistic variables to get preferences of customers and experts to determine the relative importance of customer requirements (CRs) and the relationships between customer requirements and engineering characteristics (ECs). Second, it proposes the implementation of a forecasting technique. Third, it describes more comprehensively on how future uncertainty in the weights of customer’s needs could be estimated and transmitted into the design attributes. Fourth, it proposes the implementation of a quantitative approach, which takes into account the decision maker’s attitude towards risk to optimize the QFD decision making analysis. Finally, a real-world application of QFD is provided to demonstrate the practical applicability of the proposed methodology. © 2014 Growing Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

[1]  Jiafu Tang,et al.  An ECI-based methodology for determining the final importance ratings of customer requirements in MP product improvement , 2010, Expert Syst. Appl..

[2]  Wei Xiong,et al.  An integrated linguistic-based group decision-making approach for quality function deployment , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[3]  Yoji Akao,et al.  Quality Function Deployment : Integrating Customer Requirements into Product Design , 1990 .

[4]  C K Kwong,et al.  Determining the Importance Weights for the Customer Requirements in QFD Using a Fuzzy AHP with an Extent Analysis Approach , 2003 .

[5]  Chelsea C. White,et al.  Key factors in the successful application of quality function deployment (QFD) , 2001, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[6]  Don Gunther,et al.  Quality Function Deployment - How to Make QFD Work for You , 2000 .

[7]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  A fusion approach for managing multi-granularity linguistic term sets in decision making , 2000, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[8]  V. Mahajan,et al.  Managing New Product Definition in Highly Dynamic Environments , 1998 .

[9]  Gloria Bordogna,et al.  A linguistic modeling of consensus in group decision making based on OWA operators , 1997, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A.

[10]  Jiunn-I Shieh,et al.  Integration of environmental considerations in quality function deployment by using fuzzy logic , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[11]  Min Huang,et al.  Integrating preference analysis and balanced scorecard to product planning house of quality , 2011, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[12]  Hao-Tien Liu,et al.  The extension of fuzzy QFD: From product planning to part deployment , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[13]  Louis Cohen,et al.  Quality Function Deployment: How to Make QFD Work for You , 1995 .

[14]  Zaifang Zhang,et al.  Fuzzy group decision-making for multi-format and multi-granularity linguistic judgments in quality function deployment , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[15]  William R. Russell,et al.  Decision making with stochastic dominance: An expository review , 1974 .

[16]  Biren Prasad,et al.  Review of QFD and related deployment techniques , 1998 .

[17]  H. Levy Stochastic Dominance: Investment Decision Making under Uncertainty , 2010 .

[18]  Min Xie,et al.  A systematic methodology to deal with the dynamics of customer needs in Quality Function Deployment , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[19]  Gülçin Büyüközkan,et al.  Group decision making to better respond customer needs in software development , 2005, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[20]  Shing I. Chang,et al.  An integrated group decision-making approach to quality function deployment , 1999 .

[21]  Deok-Hwan Kim,et al.  Robustness indices and robust prioritization in QFD , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[22]  Chang Hee Han,et al.  Prioritizing engineering characteristics in quality function deployment with incomplete information: A linear partial ordering approach , 2004 .

[23]  Gülser Köksal,et al.  Planning and design of industrial engineering education quality , 1998 .

[24]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  An automatic approach to reaching consensus in multiple attribute group decision making , 2009, Comput. Ind. Eng..