Three‐dimensional finite‐element simulation of the dynamic Brazilian tests on concrete cylinders

We investigate the feasibility of using cohesive theories of fracture, in conjunction with the direct simulation of fracture and fragmentation, in order to describe processes of tensile damage and compressive crushing in concrete specimens subjected to dynamic loading. We account explicitly for microcracking, the development of macroscopic cracks and inertia, and the effective dynamic behaviour of the material is predicted as an outcome of the calculations. The cohesive properties of the material are assumed to be rate-independent and are therefore determined by static properties such as the static tensile strength. The ability of model to predict the dynamic behaviour of concrete may be traced to the fact that cohesive theories endow the material with an intrinsic time scale. The particular configuration contemplated in this study is the Brazilian cylinder test performed in a Hopkinson bar. Our simulations capture closely the experimentally observed rate sensitivity of the dynamic strength of concrete in the form of a nearly linear increase in dynamic strength with strain rate. More generally, our simulations give accurate transmitted loads over a range of strain rates, which attests to the fidelity of the model where rate effects are concerned. The model also predicts key features of the fracture pattern such as the primary lens-shaped cracks parallel to the load plane, as well as the secondary profuse cracking near the supports. The primary cracks are predicted to be nucleated at the centre of the circular bases of the cylinder and to subsequently propagate towards the interior, in accordance with experimental observations. The primary and secondary cracks are responsible for two peaks in the load history, also in keeping with experiment. The results of the simulations also exhibit a size effect. These results validate the theory as it bears on mixed-mode fracture and fragmentation processes in concrete over a range of strain rates.

[1]  Michael Ortiz,et al.  Finite element simulation of dynamic fracture and fragmentation of glass rods , 2000 .

[2]  A. Needleman Micromechanical modelling of interfacial decohesion , 1992 .

[3]  Joseph W. Tedesco,et al.  Numerical analysis of high strain rate concrete direct tension tests , 1991 .

[4]  Xiaopeng Xu,et al.  Numerical simulations of fast crack growth in brittle solids , 1994 .

[5]  Albert S. Kobayashi,et al.  Fracture Process Zone for Concrete for Dynamic Loading , 1992 .

[6]  Jonathan M. Huntley,et al.  Experimental methods at high rates of strain , 1994 .

[7]  G. Ravichandran,et al.  Dynamic compressive behaviour of ceramics under lateral confinement , 1994 .

[8]  Xiaopeng Xu,et al.  Numerical simulations of dynamic crack growth along an interface , 1996 .

[9]  M. Elices,et al.  Measurement of the fracture energy using three-point bend tests: Part 1—Influence of experimental procedures , 1992 .

[10]  T. R. Hughes,et al.  Mathematical foundations of elasticity , 1982 .

[11]  John S. Popovics,et al.  Testing Concrete in Torsion: Instability Analysis and Experiments , 1998 .

[12]  M. Ortiz,et al.  Tetrahedral mesh generation based on node insertion in crystal lattice arrangements and advancing-front-Delaunay triangulation , 2000 .

[13]  V. Sánchez-Gálvez,et al.  Splitting tests : an alternative to determine the dynamic tensile strength of ceramic materials , 1994 .

[14]  Alberto Carpinteri,et al.  Mechanical damage and crack growth in concrete , 1986 .

[15]  K. Ravi-Chandar,et al.  An experimental investigation into dynamic fracture: I. Crack initiation and arrest , 1984 .

[16]  A. Hillerborg,et al.  Sensitivity in Shear Strength of Longitudinally Reinforced Concrete Beams to Fracture Energy of Concrete , 1988 .

[17]  M. Elices,et al.  Nonlinear fracture of cohesive materials , 1991, International Journal of Fracture.

[18]  Silvio Valente,et al.  Is mode II fracture energy a real material property , 1993 .

[19]  M. Ortiz,et al.  Computational modelling of impact damage in brittle materials , 1996 .

[20]  T. J.R. Hughes,et al.  ANALYSIS OF TRANSIENT ALGORITHMS WITH PARTICULAR REFERENCE TO STABILITY BEHAVIOR. , 1983 .

[21]  M. Ortiz,et al.  A material‐independent method for extending stress update algorithms from small-strain plasticity to finite plasticity with multiplicative kinematics , 1992 .

[22]  A. Kobayashi,et al.  Strain-rate sensitivity of concrete mechanical properties , 1992 .

[23]  Jacob Lubliner,et al.  On the structure of the rate equations of materials with internal variables , 1973 .

[24]  M. Elices,et al.  Measurement of the fracture energy using three-point bend tests: Part 2—Influence of bulk energy dissipation , 1992 .

[25]  D. S. Dugdale Yielding of steel sheets containing slits , 1960 .

[26]  John R. Rice,et al.  Mathematical analysis in the mechanics of fracture , 1968 .

[27]  Xiaopeng Xu,et al.  Numerical simulations of dynamic interfacial crack growth allowing for crack growth away from the bond line , 1996 .

[28]  Joshua R. Smith,et al.  Universal binding energy curves for metals and bimetallic interfaces , 1981 .

[29]  Viggo Tvergaard,et al.  Three dimensional analysis of dynamic ductile crack growth in a thin plate , 1996 .

[30]  A. Rosakis,et al.  Loading Rates and the Dynamic Initiation Toughness in Brittle Solids , 1998 .

[31]  M. Ortiz,et al.  Computational micromechanics , 1996 .

[32]  J. Hutchinson,et al.  The influence of plasticity on mixed mode interface toughness , 1993 .

[33]  Albert S. Kobayashi,et al.  Numerical Simulation of Mode 1 Dynamic Fracture of Concrete , 1991 .

[34]  A. Needleman A Continuum Model for Void Nucleation by Inclusion Debonding , 1987 .

[35]  A. Needleman An analysis of decohesion along an imperfect interface , 1990 .

[36]  Michael Ortiz,et al.  Microcrack coalescence and macroscopic crack growth initiation in brittle solids , 1988 .

[37]  J. Lubliner On the thermodynamic foundations of non-linear solid mechanics , 1972 .

[38]  J. W. Tedesco,et al.  Effects of Strain Rate on Concrete Strength , 1995 .

[39]  G. I. Barenblatt THE MATHEMATICAL THEORY OF EQUILIBRIUM CRACKS IN BRITTLE FRACTURE , 1962 .

[40]  Xiaopeng Xu,et al.  Void nucleation by inclusion debonding in a crystal matrix , 1993 .

[41]  A. Hillerborg,et al.  Analysis of crack formation and crack growth in concrete by means of fracture mechanics and finite elements , 1976 .

[42]  I. Fonseca,et al.  Relaxation inBV versus quasiconvexification inW1,p; a model for the interaction between fracture and damage , 1995 .

[43]  P. Petersson Crack growth and development of fracture zones in plain concrete and similar materials , 1981 .

[44]  C. Ruiz,et al.  Dynamic testing of ceramics under tensile stress , 1995 .

[45]  Joseph W. Tedesco,et al.  Numerical analysis of high strain rate splitting-tensile tests , 1993 .

[46]  Rolf Fandrich,et al.  The CSIRO Hopkinson Bar Facility for large diameter particle breakage , 1998 .

[47]  S. E. Swartz,et al.  Crack Propagation and Fracture of Plain Concrete Beams Subjected to Shear and Compression , 1991 .

[48]  A. de-Andrés,et al.  Elastoplastic finite element analysis of three-dimensional fatigue crack growth in aluminum shafts subjected to axial loading , 1999 .

[49]  D. A. Gorham,et al.  Stress Equilibrium in the Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar Test , 1997 .

[50]  Surendra P. Shah,et al.  Observation of mixed mode fracture with center notched disk specimens , 1996 .

[51]  Anders Boe Hauggaard-Nielsen,et al.  Tensile Strength Of Concrete At Early Age , 1996 .

[52]  A. Kobayashi,et al.  Dynamic mixed mode fracture of concrete , 1995 .

[53]  Ezio Cadoni,et al.  Impact Fracture Process and Mechanical Properties of Plain Concrete by Means of an Hopkinson Bar Bundle , 1997 .

[54]  Z. Bažant,et al.  Fracture and Size Effect in Concrete and Other Quasibrittle Materials , 1997 .

[55]  A. Kobayashi,et al.  Energy-dissipation mechanisms associated with rapid fracture of concrete , 1993 .

[56]  Viggo Tvergaard,et al.  Effect of strain-dependent cohesive zone model on predictions of crack growth resistance , 1996 .

[57]  Subra Suresh,et al.  Statistical Properties of Residual Stresses and Intergranular Fracture in Ceramic Materials , 1993 .

[58]  M. Ortiz,et al.  FINITE-DEFORMATION IRREVERSIBLE COHESIVE ELEMENTS FOR THREE-DIMENSIONAL CRACK-PROPAGATION ANALYSIS , 1999 .

[59]  P. Krysl,et al.  Finite element simulation of ring expansion and fragmentation: The capturing of length and time scales through cohesive models of fracture , 1999 .

[60]  Viggo Tvergaard,et al.  Effect of Strain Dependent Cohesive Zone Model on Predictions of Interface Crack Growth , 1996 .

[61]  Joseph W. Tedesco,et al.  Experimental and Numerical Analysis of High Strain Rate Splitting-Tensile Tests , 1993 .

[62]  A. Kobayashi,et al.  FRACTURE PROCESS ZONE IN DYNAMICALLY LOADED CRACK-LINE WEDGE-LOADED, DOUBLE-CANTILEVER BEAM CONCRETE SPECIMENS , 1991 .

[63]  Andrea Braides,et al.  Integral representation results for functionals defined on SBV(?; Rm) , 1996 .

[64]  Jaap Weerheijm,et al.  Experimental and numerical determination of the dynamic fracture energy of concrete , 1994 .