Nitrogen balance in and export from agricultural fields associated with controlled drainage systems and denitrifying bioreactors

Abstract Nitrate loss from drainage tiles across the cornbelt of the upper midwestern US is a result of intensive agriculture with limited crop diversity, extensive periods of fallow soil, and the need for high fertilizer applications to corn, all located on a hydrologically modified landscape. Two methods proposed to reduce tile nitrate export are managed or controlled drainage to limit tile flow and bioreactors to enhance denitrification. Nitrogen budgets and tile flow monitoring were conducted over two- to three-year periods between 2006 and 2009. We estimated N budgets in a seed corn-soybean rotation farming system near DeLand, east-central Illinois, USA, with free (FD) and controlled drainage (CD) patterned tile systems. In addition, wood chip filled trenches (bioreactors) were installed below the CD structures, one lined with plastic and one unlined. We measured daily tile flow and nitrate-N (NO 3 -N) concentrations and calculated cumulative N loss from the tile water at both FD and CD areas for a period of three cropping years. We also monitored the tile flow and nitrate concentration in inlet and outlet of the bioreactor associated with a CD system and evaluated the efficiency of the bioreactor for two cropping years. Most components of the N balance were unaffected by CD (yields and therefore N harvested, surface soil denitrification), and there was a negative N balance in the soybean cropping year (−165 and −163 kg N ha −1 at FD and CD areas, respectively), whereas seed corn cropping in the following year resulted in positive N balances (29 and 34 kg N ha −1 at FD and CD areas, respectively). For two years, the overall N balances were −136 and −129 kg N ha −1 at FD and CD areas, respectively, consistent with other recent corn belt studies showing a small net depletion of soil organic N. Controlled drainage greatly reduced tile N export, with a three-year average loss of 57.2 kg N ha −1  yr −1 from FD compared to 17 kg N ha −1  yr −1 for CD. There was high uncertainty in denitrification measurements and thus the fate of missing N in the CD system remained unknown. Nitrate reduction efficiency of the bioreactor varied greatly, with periods where nearly 100% of the nitrate was denitrified. The overall efficiency of the bioreactor associated with the CD system in reducing the tile N load was 33%. When nitrate was non-limiting, the nitrate removal rate of the bioreactor was 6.4 g N m −3  d −1 . Little N 2 O emission was found from the bioreactor bed and is not thought to be a problem with these systems. Both the tile bioreactor and controlled drainage greatly reduced tile nitrate export in this leaky seed corn and soybean agricultural field.

[1]  D. Blowes,et al.  Removal of agricultural nitrate from tile-drainage effluent water using in-line bioreactors , 1994 .

[2]  J. Eheart,et al.  Estimation of flow and transport parameters for woodchip-based bioreactors: II. field-scale bioreactor , 2010 .

[3]  Newell R Kitchen,et al.  Economically optimal nitrogen rate reduces soil residual nitrate. , 2007, Journal of environmental quality.

[4]  O. W. Israelsen,et al.  Irrigation principles and practices , 1932 .

[5]  Arthur J. Gold,et al.  Denitrifying bioreactors - an approach for reducing nitrate loads to receiving waters. , 2010 .

[6]  Mark B. David,et al.  Application of the DNDC model to tile-drained Illinois agroecosystems: model calibration, validation, and uncertainty analysis , 2007, Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems.

[7]  R. W. Skaggs,et al.  Drainage Control to Diminish Nitrate Loss from Agricultural Fields 1 , 1979 .

[8]  F. Below,et al.  Nitrogen mass balance of a tile-drained agricultural watershed in East-Central Illinois. , 2009, Journal of environmental quality.

[9]  Craig F. Drury,et al.  Influence of controlled drainage-subirrigation on surface and tile drainage nitrate loss , 1996 .

[10]  C. Drury,et al.  Managing tile drainage, subirrigation, and nitrogen fertilization to enhance crop yields and reduce nitrate loss. , 2009, Journal of environmental quality.

[11]  R. Libra,et al.  Revisiting nitrate concentrations in the Des Moines River: 1945 and 1976-2001. , 2003, Journal of environmental quality.

[12]  W. Robertson,et al.  Nitrate Removal Rates in a 15‐Year‐Old Permeable Reactive Barrier Treating Septic System Nitrate , 2008 .

[13]  L. Puckett,et al.  Identifying the major sources of nutrient water pollution , 1995 .

[14]  R. Skaggs,et al.  Effect of Drainage Water Management on Water Conservation and Nitrogen Losses to Surface Waters , 2008 .

[15]  D. Shen,et al.  Characteristics of the bioreactor landfill system using an anaerobic-aerobic process for nitrogen removal. , 2007, Bioresource technology.

[16]  D. Jaynes,et al.  Denitrification in wood chip bioreactors at different water flows. , 2009, Journal of environmental quality.

[17]  R. W. Weaver,et al.  Microbiological and biochemical properties , 1994 .

[18]  D. Jaynes,et al.  In situ bioreactors and deep drain-pipe installation to reduce nitrate losses in artificially drained fields. , 2008, Journal of environmental quality.

[19]  D. Karlen,et al.  Nitrate loss in subsurface drainage as affected by nitrogen fertilizer rate. , 2001, Journal of environmental quality.

[20]  O. Folorunso,et al.  Spatial Variability of Field‐Measured Denitrification Gas Fluxes , 1984 .

[21]  J. Tiedje,et al.  Spatial Variation in Denitrification: Dependency of Activity Centers on the Soil Environment , 1990 .

[22]  J. Chuna,et al.  Estimation of flow and transport parameters for woodchip-based bioreactors : I . laboratory-scale bioreactor , 2022 .

[23]  K. Brye,et al.  Crop management and corn nitrogen rate effects on nitrate leaching , 2000 .

[24]  G. McIsaac,et al.  Net N input and riverine N export from Illinois agricultural watersheds with and without extensive tile drainage , 2004 .

[25]  J. Schoonover,et al.  Ground Water Nitrogen Dynamics in Giant Cane and Forest Riparian Buffers , 2009 .

[26]  Richard A C Cooke,et al.  Effectiveness of Constructed Wetlands in Reducing Nitrogen and Phosphorus Export from Agricultural Tile Drainage , 2000 .

[27]  M. B. David,et al.  The role of seepage in constructed wetlands receiving agricultural tile drainage , 2000 .

[28]  Christina Tonitto,et al.  Modeling denitrification in a tile-drained, corn and soybean agroecosystem of Illinois, USA , 2009 .

[29]  H. Uemoto,et al.  An additional simple denitrification bioreactor using packed gel envelopes applicable to industrial wastewater treatment , 2007, Biotechnology and Bioengineering.

[30]  O. W. Israelsen Irrigation Principles And Practices 2Nd. Ed. , 1950 .

[31]  W. Wiseman,et al.  Hypoxia in the Gulf of Mexico. , 2001, Journal of environmental quality.

[32]  J. Meisinger,et al.  Influence of Sample Size on Measurement of Soil Denitrification1 , 1987 .

[33]  M. B. David,et al.  Nitrogen cycling and tile drainage nitrate loss in a corn/soybean watershed , 1998 .

[34]  L. Schipper,et al.  Five years of nitrate removal, denitrification and carbon dynamics in a denitrification wall. , 2001, Water research.

[35]  David A. Kovacic,et al.  Nitrogen Balance in and Export from an Agricultural Watershed , 1997 .

[36]  C. Madramootoo,et al.  Effects of controlled drainage on nitrate concentrations in subsurface drain discharge , 1996 .

[37]  H. Hunter,et al.  Nitrate removal, denitrification and nitrous oxide production in the riparian zone of an ephemeral stream. , 2009 .