Severe deterministic effects of external exposure and intake of radioactive material: basis for emergency response criteria

Lessons learned from responses to past events have shown that more guidance is needed for the response to radiation emergencies (in this context, a 'radiation emergency' means the same as a 'nuclear or radiological emergency') which could lead to severe deterministic effects. The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) requirements for preparedness and response for a radiation emergency, inter alia, require that arrangements shall be made to prevent, to a practicable extent, severe deterministic effects and to provide the appropriate specialised treatment for these effects. These requirements apply to all exposure pathways, both internal and external, and all reasonable scenarios, to include those resulting from malicious acts (e.g. dirty bombs). This paper briefly describes the approach used to develop the basis for emergency response criteria for protective actions to prevent severe deterministic effects in the case of external exposure and intake of radioactive material.

[1]  Richard Paynter,et al.  The Radiological Accident at the Irradiation Facility in Nesvizh , 1998 .

[2]  A. Spinelli,et al.  The effects of the Chernobyl explosion on induced abortion in Italy. , 1991, Biomedicine & pharmacotherapy = Biomedecine & pharmacotherapie.

[3]  B. Scott,et al.  RISK ESTIMATES FOR DETERMINISTIC HEALTH EFFECTS OF INHALED WEAPONS GRADE PLUTONIUM , 2003, Health physics.

[4]  A. F. Eidson,et al.  Predicted and observed early effects of combined alpha and beta lung irradiation. , 1990, Health physics.

[5]  B. Scott Calculating Hematopoietic-Mode-Lethality Risk Avoidance Associated with Radionuclide Decorporation Countermeasures Related to a Radiological Terrorism Incident , 2009, Dose-response : a publication of International Hormesis Society.

[6]  C. Proukakis,et al.  The victims of chernobyl in Greece: induced abortions after the accident. , 1987, British medical journal.

[7]  Jerzy Zandberg,et al.  International Basic Safety Standards for Protection against Ionizing Radiation and for the Safety of Radiation Sources Safety series No. 115 , 2003 .

[8]  Jack Valentin,et al.  Relative biological effectiveness (RBE), quality factor (Q), and radiation weighting factor (wR) , 2003 .

[9]  F. Hahn,et al.  A model that leads to the Weibull distribution function to characterize early radiation response probabilities. , 1980, Health physics.

[10]  J. Hopewell Biological Effects of Irradiation on Skin and Recommended Dose Limits , 1991 .

[11]  Thomas McKenna,et al.  LESSONS LEARNED FROM CHERNOBYL AND OTHER EMERGENCIES: ESTABLISHING INTERNATIONAL REQUIREMENTS AND GUIDANCE , 2007, Health physics.

[12]  Mark Western,et al.  Expecting the unexpected , 2012 .

[13]  Icrp Human Respiratory Tract Model for Radiological Protection , 1994 .

[14]  Scott Br Proposed estimates of te probability of inducing pulmonary injury sufficient to cause death from radiation pneumonitis and pulmonary fibrosis after briefly inhaling a mixture of insoluble beta-emitting particles. , 1980 .

[15]  岩崎 民子 SOURCES AND EFFECTS OF IONIZING RADIATION : United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation UNSCEAR 2000 Report to the General Assembly, with Scientific Annexes , 2002 .

[16]  L. Knudsen Legally induced abortions in Denmark after Chernobyl. , 1991, Biomedicine & pharmacotherapy = Biomedecine & pharmacotherapie.

[17]  C. Orton Bioeffect Dosimetry in Radiation Therapy , 1986 .

[18]  Kath Bhanot,et al.  Preliminary fact finding mission following the accident at the nuclear fuel processing facility in Tokaimura, Japan (Vienna: IAEA) , 2000, Journal of radiological protection : official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection.