Algoactivistic Practices in Ridesharing - A Topic Modeling & Grounded Theory Approach

Digital platforms in the gig economy (e.g., Uber, Amazon Mechanical Turk) increasingly use algorithmbased mechanisms to manage workers. One mechanism is algorithmic replacing through which underperforming workers are automatically excluded from platform activities and substituted with other workers. Although algorithmic replacing is an effective means to assure adequate worker output, it causes algoactivism, which refers to worker resistance to the employed algorithms. Drawing on algorithmic management literature, we examined algoactivism using topic modeling and grounded theory on driver posts from Uberpeople.net to identify and classify algoactivistic practices in ridesharing. Our results reveal eleven algoactivistic practices that can be arranged and depicted in a "Categories of Algoactivistic Practices in Ridesharing" (CAR) model. Overall, our study expands the literature on algorithmic management by shedding light on algoactivism as a crucial worker reaction to algorithmic management and provides practitioners with valuable insights to deal with the phenomenon to ascertain a fair working environment.

[1]  Angèle Christin,et al.  Algorithms at Work: The New Contested Terrain of Control , 2020, Academy of Management Annals.

[2]  D. Blei,et al.  Exploiting affinities between topic modeling and the sociological perspective on culture: Application to newspaper coverage of U.S. government arts funding , 2013 .

[3]  Key Pousttchi,et al.  Mobile word-of-mouth – A grounded theory of mobile viral marketing , 2009, J. Inf. Technol..

[4]  Keyvan Vakili,et al.  The double-edged sword of recombination in breakthrough innovation , 2013 .

[5]  Michael S. Bernstein,et al.  Flash Organizations: Crowdsourcing Complex Work by Structuring Crowds As Organizations , 2017, CHI.

[6]  Lyndon Garrett,et al.  Alternative Work Arrangements: Two Images of the New World of Work , 2017 .

[7]  Laura A. Dabbish,et al.  Working with Machines: The Impact of Algorithmic and Data-Driven Management on Human Workers , 2015, CHI.

[8]  Aniket Kittur,et al.  CrowdForge: crowdsourcing complex work , 2011, UIST.

[9]  B. Bergvall-Kåreborn,et al.  A Typology of Crowdwork Platforms , 2019 .

[10]  H. Berends,et al.  Regulated Dependence: Platform Workers’ Responses to New Forms of Organizing , 2020 .

[11]  Lior Zalmanson,et al.  Hands on the Wheel: Navigating Algorithmic Management and Uber Drivers' Autonomy , 2017, ICIS.

[12]  Ioanna D. Constantiou,et al.  New games, new rules: big data and the changing context of strategy , 2015, J. Inf. Technol..

[13]  Chris Sauer,et al.  A Normative Theory of Organizational Control: Main and Interaction Effects of control Modes on Performance , 2010, ECIS.

[14]  Theresa Schmiedel,et al.  Topic Modeling as a Strategy of Inquiry in Organizational Research: A Tutorial With an Application Example on Organizational Culture , 2018 .

[15]  Hayagreeva Rao,et al.  COVERT POLITICAL CONFLICT IN ORGANIZATIONS: Challenges from Below , 2003 .

[16]  Alexander Benlian,et al.  Differential effects of formal and self-control in mobile platform ecosystems: Multi-method findings on third-party developers' continuance intentions and application quality , 2017, Inf. Manag..

[17]  Mohammad Hossein Jarrahi,et al.  Algorithmic Management and Algorithmic Competencies: Understanding and Appropriating Algorithms in Gig Work , 2019, iConference.

[18]  R. Gregory,et al.  Algorithmic Management of Work on Online Labor Platforms: When Matching Meets Control , 2021, MIS Q..

[19]  Ulrich Remus,et al.  Control Configuration and Control Enactment in Information Systems Projects: Review and Expanded Theoretical Framework , 2016, MIS Q..

[20]  Alexander Benlian,et al.  Perceived input control on online platforms from the application developer perspective: conceptualisation and scale development , 2019, J. Decis. Syst..

[21]  Henri Schildt,et al.  Big data and organizational design – the brave new world of algorithmic management and computer augmented transparency , 2017 .

[22]  Phillip H. Kim,et al.  Labor of Love: Amateurs and Lay-expertise Legitimation in the Early U.S. Radio Field , 2018 .

[23]  Keyvan Vakili,et al.  Topic Modeling in Management Research: Rendering New Theory from Textual Data , 2019, Academy of Management Annals.

[24]  Sue Newell,et al.  Strategic opportunities (and challenges) of algorithmic decision-making: A call for action on the long-term societal effects of 'datification' , 2015, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[25]  JoAnne Yates,et al.  The Autonomy Paradox: The Implications of Mobile Email Devices for Knowledge Professionals , 2013, Organ. Sci..

[26]  John J. Horton,et al.  Research Note - Are Online Labor Markets Spot Markets for Tasks? A Field Experiment on the Behavioral Response to Wage Cuts , 2016, Inf. Syst. Res..

[27]  Andrew McCallum,et al.  Optimizing Semantic Coherence in Topic Models , 2011, EMNLP.

[28]  Helmut Krcmar,et al.  Grounded Theory Methodology in Information Systems Research , 2017, MIS Q..

[29]  Alex Rosenblat,et al.  Algorithmic Labor and Information Asymmetries: A Case Study of Uber’s Drivers , 2016 .

[30]  Jacki O'Neill,et al.  Being a turker , 2014, CSCW.

[31]  M. Wiener,et al.  Algorithmic Controls and their Implications for Gig Worker Well-being and Behavior , 2020, International Conference on Interaction Sciences.

[32]  R. Bouncken,et al.  Gaining Legitimacy by Being Different: Optimal Distinctiveness in Crowdfunding Platforms , 2021, Academy of Management Journal.

[33]  M. Six Silberman,et al.  Turkopticon: interrupting worker invisibility in amazon mechanical turk , 2013, CHI.

[34]  Amrit Tiwana,et al.  Evolutionary Competition in Platform Ecosystems , 2015, Inf. Syst. Res..

[35]  David A. Askay A Conceptual Framework for Investigating Organizational Control and Resistance in Crowd-Based Platforms , 2017, HICSS.

[36]  Kevin Crowston,et al.  Impacts of Machine Learning on Work , 2019, HICSS.

[37]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  The Algorithm and the Crowd: Considering the Materiality of Service Innovation , 2015, MIS Q..

[38]  J. House Work stress and social support , 1981 .

[39]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[40]  Valerio De Stefano The rise of the "just-in-time workforce": on-demand work, crowdwork and labour protection in the "gig-economy" , 2015 .

[41]  N. Lin,et al.  Social support, stressful life events, and illness: a model and an empirical test. , 1979, Journal of health and social behavior.

[42]  David H. Autor,et al.  Replication data for: Why Are There Still So Many Jobs? The History and Future of Workplace Automation , 2019 .

[43]  David M. Blei,et al.  Probabilistic topic models , 2012, Commun. ACM.

[44]  Klaus Krippendorff,et al.  Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology , 1980 .

[45]  Steven Meisel,et al.  “Ain't Misbehavin”: Workplace deviance as organizational resistance , 2008 .

[46]  Gordon Burtch,et al.  Can You Gig it? An Empirical Examination of the Gig-Economy and Entrepreneurial Activity , 2016, Manag. Sci..

[47]  W. Ouchi A Conceptual Framework for the Design of Organizational Control Mechanisms , 1979 .

[48]  Vincent Etter,et al.  Where to go from here? Mobility prediction from instantaneous information , 2013, Pervasive Mob. Comput..

[49]  Michael S. Bernstein,et al.  Expert crowdsourcing with flash teams , 2014, UIST.

[50]  Nura Jabagi,et al.  Perceived Organizational Support in the Face of Algorithmic Management: A Conceptual Model , 2020, HICSS.

[51]  Michael A. Osborne,et al.  The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation? , 2017 .

[52]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  Latent Dirichlet Allocation , 2001, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[53]  Richard F.J. Haans What's the value of being different when everyone is? The effects of distinctiveness on performance in homogeneous versus heterogeneous categories , 2018, Strategic Management Journal.

[54]  Luc K. Audebrand,et al.  Gig-workers’ motivation: thinking beyond carrots and sticks , 2019, Journal of Managerial Psychology.