Cross-Reacting Antibodies Enhance Dengue Virus Infection in Humans

Dangerous Dengue Provocation One problem with dengue virus is that one infection does not protect against a subsequent infection; secondary infections can result in the severe immunopathology of dengue hemorrhagic fever. Dejnirattisai et al. (p. 745) derived a panel of monoclonal antibodies specific for dengue viruses. These antibodies were mainly directed against the dengue virus precursor membrane protein (prM), and most cross-reacted with all four dengue serotypes. The antibodies were not capable of fully neutralizing the virus, but instead promoted immune responses over a wide range of concentrations. During virus production and virion assembly, maturation of prm is often incomplete, and, consequently, a major part of the host's natural antibody response recognizes a component that is present in variable numbers on the virion. Thus, rather than resulting in complete neutralization, the antibody response promotes virus infection of cells that carry receptors for antibodies. Variable maturation of a dengue viral antigen results in incomplete neutralization and promotes secondary pathology. Dengue virus co-circulates as four serotypes, and sequential infections with more than one serotype are common. One hypothesis for the increased severity seen in secondary infections is antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) leading to increased replication in Fc receptor–bearing cells. In this study, we have generated a panel of human monoclonal antibodies to dengue virus. Antibodies to the structural precursor-membrane protein (prM) form a major component of the response. These antibodies are highly cross-reactive among the dengue virus serotypes and, even at high concentrations, do not neutralize infection but potently promote ADE. We propose that the partial cleavage of prM from the viral surface reduces the density of antigen available for viral neutralization, leaving dengue viruses susceptible to ADE by antibody to prM, a finding that has implications for future vaccine design.

[1]  S. Halstead,et al.  Epidemiologic studies on Dengue in Santiago de Cuba, 1997. , 2000, American journal of epidemiology.

[2]  D. Fremont,et al.  The structural immunology of antibody protection against West Nile virus , 2008, Immunological reviews.

[3]  Wei Zhang,et al.  Structure of the Immature Dengue Virus at Low pH Primes Proteolytic Maturation , 2008, Science.

[4]  F. Guirakhoo,et al.  Fusion activity of flaviviruses: comparison of mature and immature (prM-containing) tick-borne encephalitis virions. , 1991, The Journal of general virology.

[5]  T. Duangchinda,et al.  Production of anti-dengue NS1 monoclonal antibodies by DNA immunization. , 2003, Journal of virological methods.

[6]  B. Murphy,et al.  An efficient method to make human monoclonal antibodies from memory B cells: potent neutralization of SARS coronavirus , 2004, Nature Medicine.

[7]  Ying Zhang,et al.  The Flavivirus Precursor Membrane-Envelope Protein Complex: Structure and Maturation , 2008, Science.

[8]  B. Murphy,et al.  Prospects for a dengue virus vaccine , 2007, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[9]  A. Kanjanahaluethai,et al.  Differential Modulation of prM Cleavage, Extracellular Particle Distribution, and Virus Infectivity by Conserved Residues at Nonfurin Consensus Positions of the Dengue Virus pr-M Junction , 2008, Journal of Virology.

[10]  S. Halstead,et al.  Risk factors in dengue shock syndrome: a prospective epidemiologic study in Rayong, Thailand. I. The 1980 outbreak. , 1984, American journal of epidemiology.

[11]  T. Osawa,et al.  Cross-Reacting Antibodies Enhance Dengue Virus Infection in Humans , 2010 .

[12]  G. Nybakken,et al.  Structural basis for the preferential recognition of immature flaviviruses by a fusion‐loop antibody , 2009, The EMBO journal.

[13]  SB Halstead,et al.  Dengue viruses and mononuclear phagocytes. I. Infection enhancement by non-neutralizing antibody , 1977, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[14]  G. Chang,et al.  Antibodies to Envelope Glycoprotein of Dengue Virus during the Natural Course of Infection Are Predominantly Cross-Reactive and Recognize Epitopes Containing Highly Conserved Residues at the Fusion Loop of Domain II , 2008, Journal of Virology.

[15]  Yee‐Shin Lin,et al.  The Dual-Specific Binding of Dengue Virus and Target Cells for the Antibody-Dependent Enhancement of Dengue Virus Infection1 , 2006, The Journal of Immunology.

[16]  A. Nisalak,et al.  An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay to characterize dengue infections where dengue and Japanese encephalitis co-circulate. , 1989, The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene.

[17]  S. Yoksan,et al.  The micro-focus reduction neutralization test for determining dengue and Japanese encephalitis neutralizing antibodies in volunteers vaccinated against dengue. , 1997, Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene.

[18]  P. Malasit,et al.  Novel anti‐dengue monoclonal antibody recognizing conformational structure of the prM‐E heterodimeric complex of dengue virus , 2008, Journal of medical virology.

[19]  J. Smit,et al.  Functional importance of dengue virus maturation: infectious properties of immature virions. , 2008, The Journal of general virology.

[20]  S. Nitayaphan,et al.  Rapid detection and identification of dengue viruses by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). , 1996, The Southeast Asian journal of tropical medicine and public health.

[21]  Y. Modis,et al.  Structure of the dengue virus envelope protein after membrane fusion , 2004, Nature.

[22]  G. Screaton,et al.  A Complex Interplay among Virus, Dendritic Cells, T Cells, and Cytokines in Dengue Virus Infections1 , 2008, The Journal of Immunology.