Towards a unified model for analyzing conversion complexity in optical switching networks

Abstract Wavelength converters (WCs) are used in almost all optical switch architectures to perform switching in the wavelength domain. The ability of changing the wavelength of an input signal to another wavelength can improve blocking performance, and hence, improve the overall throughput of optical switches. The variety of types and technologies used to realize WCs make it difficult to quantify and compare the complexity and cost of the various switching architectures. In this paper we show that current models for quantifying conversion complexity do not capture the essence of the conversion process, and hence, may not be suitable for various conversion technologies. Moreover, even for the same conversion technology, the models are not flexible to consider the way that converters are adopted within the architecture. Accordingly, we attempt, for the first time to our knowledge, to develop a unified model for analyzing conversion complexity. The proposed abstract model is shown to be applicable to known conversion architectures and it avoids the limitations of existing models. The usability of the model is demonstrated on various known optical switch architectures under different conversion types.

[1]  Eiji Oki,et al.  Performance of dynamic pump-wavelength selection for optical packet switch with chained parametric wavelength conversion , 2014, IEEE/OSA Journal of Optical Communications and Networking.

[2]  Eiji Oki,et al.  Recursive Parametric Wavelength Conversion Scheme for Optical Packet Switch , 2011, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[3]  H. Li,et al.  Cost-saving two-Layer wavelength conversion in optical switching network , 2006, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[4]  Reducing Wavelength Conversion Range in Space/Wavelength Switches , 2008, IEEE Photonics Technology Letters.

[5]  R. Spanke Architectures for guided-wave optical space switching systems , 1987, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[6]  Weisheng Hu,et al.  A Study of Modular AWGs for Large-Scale Optical Switching Systems , 2012, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[7]  Haitham S. Hamza On the Complexity of Optical Cross-Connects under Flat and Recursive Shared Wave-Mixing Converters , 2010, IEEE Communications Letters.

[8]  Delfin Y. Montuno,et al.  Optimization of optical cross-connects with wave-mixing conversion , 2005, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.

[9]  Yuanyuan Yang,et al.  Designing WDM optical interconnects with full connectivity by using limited wavelength conversion , 2004, 18th International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium, 2004. Proceedings..

[10]  Martin Zirngibl,et al.  WDM cross-connect architectures with reduced complexity , 1999 .

[11]  Eiji Oki,et al.  Optical Packet Switch Based on Dynamic Pump Wavelength Selection , 2011 .

[12]  V. Benes On rearrangeable three-stage connecting networks , 1962 .

[13]  Yuanyuan Yang,et al.  Cost-effective designs of WDM optical interconnects , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems.

[14]  Igal Brener,et al.  Multiple channel wavelength conversion using engineered quasi-phase matching structures in LiNbO/sub 3/ waveguides , 1999 .

[15]  Charles Clos,et al.  A study of non-blocking switching networks , 1953 .

[16]  Tong Ye,et al.  AWG-Based Non-Blocking Clos Networks , 2015, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.

[17]  M. Listanti,et al.  Cost Evaluation of Optical Packet Switches Equipped With Limited-Range and Full-Range Converters for Contention Resolution , 2008, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[18]  S. J. B. Yoo,et al.  An architecture for a wavelength-interchanging cross-connect utilizing parametric wavelength converters , 1999 .

[19]  Rajiv Ramaswami,et al.  Multiwavelength optical networks with limited wavelength conversion , 1997, Proceedings of INFOCOM '97.