A prevalent exposure to male dog is a risk factor for exclusive allergic sensitization to Can f 5: An Italian Multicenter Study.

[1]  K. Bønnelykke,et al.  Children mono-sensitized to Can f 5 show different reactions to male- and female dog allergen extract provocation: a randomized controlled trial. , 2019, The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice.

[2]  G. Liccardi,et al.  Frequency of allergic sensitization to Can f 5 in North East Italy. An analysis of 1403 ISACs 112 (Component Resolved Diagnosis) collected retrospectively. , 2019, European annals of allergy and clinical immunology.

[3]  G. Passalacqua,et al.  Can f 5 as a suitable marker of dog allergy: Assess male dog exposure before banning it. , 2019, Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology.

[4]  G. Liccardi,et al.  Dog allergy: can a prevalent or exclusive sensitization to Can f 5 be considered a lucky or negative event in real life? , 2018, European annals of allergy and clinical immunology.

[5]  H. Grönlund,et al.  Molecular allergy diagnostics refine characterization of children sensitized to dog dander , 2018, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.

[6]  G. Passalacqua,et al.  Critical aspects in dog allergen immunotherapy (DAI). May Component Resolved Diagnosis (CRD) play a role in predicting the efficacy? , 2018, Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics.

[7]  G. Canonica,et al.  Allergic sensitization to common pets (cats/dogs) according to different possible modalities of exposure: an Italian Multicenter Study , 2018, Clinical and Molecular Allergy.

[8]  K. Bønnelykke,et al.  Precision allergy: Separate allergies to male and female dogs. , 2017, The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice.

[9]  J. Lidholm,et al.  Prostatic kallikrein: a new major dog allergen. , 2009, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.