Visual Evoked Potentials Used to Evaluate a Commercially Available Superabsorbent Polymer as a Cheap and Efficient Material for Preparation-Free Electrodes for Recording Electrical Potentials of the Human Visual Cortex

The aim of this study was to investigate the use of inexpensive and easy-to-use hydrogel “marble” electrodes for the recording of electrical potentials of the human visual cortex using visual evoked potentials (VEPs) as example. Top hat-shaped holders for the marble electrodes were developed with an electrode cap to acquire the signals. In 12 healthy volunteers, we compared the VEPs obtained with conventional gold-cup electrodes to those obtained with marble electrodes. Checkerboards of two check sizes—0.8° and 0.25°—were presented. Despite the higher impedance of the marble electrodes, the line noise could be completely removed by averaging 64 single traces, and VEPs could be recorded. Linear mixed-effect models using electrode type, stimulus, and recording duration revealed a statistically significant effect of the electrode type on only VEP N75 peak latency (mean ± SEM: 1.0 ± 1.2 ms) and amplitude (mean ± SEM: 0.8 ± 0.9 µV) The mean amplitudes of the delta, theta, alpha, beta, and gamma frequency bands of marble electrodes were statistically significantly different and, on average, 25% higher than those of gold-cup electrodes. However, the mean amplitudes showed a statistically significant strong correlation (Pearson’s r = 0.8). We therefore demonstrate the potential of the inexpensive and efficient hydrogel electrode to replace conventional gold-cup electrodes for the recording of VEPs and possibly other recordings from the human cortex.

[1]  Nigel H. Lovell,et al.  Organic electrode coatings for next-generation neural interfaces , 2014, Front. Neuroeng..

[2]  S. Luck,et al.  The effects of electrode impedance on data quality and statistical significance in ERP recordings. , 2010, Psychophysiology.

[3]  S. Tobimatsu,et al.  Normal variability of the amplitude and phase of steady-state VEPs. , 1996, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[4]  Mingui Sun,et al.  Novel Hydrogel-Based Preparation-Free EEG Electrode , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[5]  K. Kabiri,et al.  Superabsorbent Polymer Materials: A Review , 2008 .

[6]  Arne C. Bathke,et al.  The ANOVA F test can still be used in some balanced designs with unequal variances and nonnormal data , 2004 .

[7]  Genevieve McArthur,et al.  Does combing the scalp reduce scalp electrode impedances? , 2010, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[8]  R. Alarcón,et al.  Effect of variance ratio on ANOVA robustness: Might 1.5 be the limit? , 2018, Behavior research methods.

[9]  Eberhart Zrenner,et al.  Transcorneal electrical stimulation for patients with retinitis pigmentosa: a prospective, randomized, sham-controlled exploratory study. , 2011, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[10]  D. Tucker,et al.  Scalp electrode impedance, infection risk, and EEG data quality , 2001, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[11]  P. Basser,et al.  Osmotic swelling of polyacrylate hydrogels in physiological salt solutions. , 2000, Biomacromolecules.

[12]  E. Zrenner,et al.  An integrated domain specific language for post-processing and visualizing electrophysiological signals in Java , 2010, 2010 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology.

[13]  D. Creel,et al.  Visually evoked potentials. , 2019, Handbook of clinical neurology.

[14]  L. Sherlin,et al.  Validation of a wireless dry electrode system for electroencephalography , 2015, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[15]  Johannes Sarnthein,et al.  High test–retest reliability of checkerboard reversal visual evoked potentials (VEP) over 8 months , 2009, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[16]  Wouter Olthuis,et al.  Hydrogel-based devices for biomedical applications , 2010 .

[17]  Jeffrey M. Liebmann,et al.  Repeatability of short-duration transient visual evoked potentials in normal subjects , 2010, Documenta Ophthalmologica.

[18]  C. Grimbergen,et al.  Investigation into the origin of the noise of surface electrodes , 2002, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[19]  S. Bhattacharya,et al.  Synthesis and characterization of biopolymer based hybrid hydrogel nanocomposite and study of their electrochemical efficacy. , 2019, International journal of biological macromolecules.

[20]  Gernot R. Müller-Putz,et al.  Evaluation of Different EEG Acquisition Systems Concerning Their Suitability for Building a Brain–Computer Interface: Case Studies , 2016, Front. Neurosci..

[21]  G. Trick,et al.  Improved electrode for electroretinography. , 1979, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[22]  Gilles Lubineau,et al.  A highly sensitive, low-cost, wearable pressure sensor based on conductive hydrogel spheres. , 2015, Nanoscale.

[23]  Ronald X. Xu,et al.  Simultaneous Measurements of Geometric and Viscoelastic Properties of Hydrogel Microbeads Using Continuous-Flow Microfluidics with Embedded Electrodes. , 2017, Small.

[24]  L. Trahms,et al.  The influence of amplifier, interface and biological noise on signal quality in high-resolution EEG recordings , 2006, Physiological measurement.

[25]  Zhenxin Wang,et al.  Nanofibrous microspheres via emulsion gelation and carbonization. , 2015, Chemical communications.

[26]  Chris Van Hoof,et al.  Soft, Comfortable Polymer Dry Electrodes for High Quality ECG and EEG Recording , 2014, Sensors.

[27]  Michael Bach,et al.  Guidelines for calibration of stimulus and recording parameters used in clinical electrophysiology of vision , 2003, Documenta Ophthalmologica.

[28]  Eberhart Zrenner,et al.  Erg explorer: a software for post-processing, analysing, and reporting of electrophysiological data , 2008 .

[29]  V. Khutoryanskiy,et al.  Biomedical applications of hydrogels: A review of patents and commercial products , 2015 .

[30]  Michael D Dickey,et al.  Soft electrodes combining hydrogel and liquid metal. , 2018, Soft matter.

[31]  Michael Bach,et al.  ISCEV standard for clinical visual evoked potentials: (2016 update) , 2016, Documenta Ophthalmologica.

[32]  H. Jasper Report of the committee on methods of clinical examination in electroencephalography , 1958 .

[33]  Enas M. Ahmed,et al.  Hydrogel: Preparation, characterization, and applications: A review , 2013, Journal of advanced research.

[34]  Margaret Young,et al.  Visual evoked potentials with CRT and LCD monitors , 2009, Neurology.

[35]  Xuanhe Zhao,et al.  Hydrogel bioelectronics. , 2019, Chemical Society reviews.

[36]  J. Zempel,et al.  Long term electroencephalography in preterm neonates: Safety and quality of electrode types , 2018, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[37]  Michael Bach,et al.  ISCEV standard for clinical visual evoked potentials (2009 update) , 2010, Documenta Ophthalmologica.

[38]  B. Oken,et al.  Normal temporal variability of the P100. , 1987, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[39]  K. Michaelsen,et al.  Test-Retest Reliability of Swept Visual Evoked Potential Measurements of Infant Visual Acuity and Contrast Sensitivity , 2004, Pediatric Research.

[40]  B. Heller,et al.  Reducing the sensation of electrical stimulation with dry electrodes by using an array of constant current sources. , 2018, Medical Engineering and Physics.

[41]  P. Calvert,et al.  Impedimetric transduction of swelling in pH-responsive hydrogels. , 2015, The Analyst.