Latest Developments in Robotic Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Interventional cardiovascular medicine has seen constant progress over the last few decades. Since the first angiograms and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty were carried out, this progress has been tremendous and has led to a substantial decline in cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. The purpose of this article is to report and review the latest developments and evidence in robotics-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention (rPCI) and its potential future applications, opportunities, and limitations. Contemporary evidence shows that rPCI can lead to a significant reduction in radiation exposure as well as medical hazards for cardiologists. Rates of device and procedural success remain high and there is no evidence of a disadvantage for the patient. The accuracy of implantation with a reduced geographic mismatch is a further advantage that can result in a higher quality of treatment. Even in complex coronary lesions and procedures, rPCI seems to be safe and efficient. The latest developments include telestenting over hundreds of kilometers from a remote platform. Currently, the main limitations are the absence of large-scale randomized trials for the valid assessment of the benefits and disadvantages of rPCI as well as the technical limitations of the currently available rPCI systems. rPCI is a forward-looking innovation in cardiology that is applicable to a wide range of coronary interventions. Despite the present lack of knowledge and the limited data concerning the outcome for the patient, the available literature reveals promising results that should lead to improvements for physicians and patients.

[1]  M. Petrasko,et al.  Robotic-Assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Through Transradial Approach: Experience in 4 Patients with Complex Lesions. , 2020, Texas Heart Institute journal.

[2]  J. Grantham,et al.  A case of robotic assisted percutaneous coronary intervention of the left main coronary artery in a patient with very late baffle stenosis after surgical correction of anomalous left coronary artery from the pulmonary artery , 2020, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[3]  Andrew J. Kalafut,et al.  Network latency and long‐distance robotic telestenting: Exploring the potential impact of network delays on telestenting performance , 2020, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[4]  N. Kottenstette,et al.  Feasibility of Robotic Telestenting Over Long Geographic Distances A Pre-clinical Ex Vivo and In Vivo Study. , 2019, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[5]  E. Mahmud,et al.  Robotic-Assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Concept, Data, and Clinical Application. , 2019, Interventional cardiology clinics.

[6]  E. Mahmud,et al.  Complex robotic compared to manual coronary interventions: 6‐ and 12‐month outcomes , 2018, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[7]  Рабочая группа Еок РЕКОМЕНДАЦИИ ЕОК ПО ВЕДЕНИЮ ПАЦИЕНТОВ С ОСТРЫМ ИНФАРКТОМ МИОКАРДА С ПОДЪЕМОМ СЕГМЕНТА ST 2017 , 2018 .

[8]  C. Riga,et al.  Flexible robotic catheters in the visceral segment of the aorta: advantages and limitations. , 2018, The Journal of cardiovascular surgery.

[9]  A. Styś,et al.  Robotic-Assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention of a Saphenous Vein Graft Stenosis using a FilterWire EZ Embolic Protection. , 2018, South Dakota medicine : the journal of the South Dakota State Medical Association.

[10]  Marco Valgimigli,et al.  2017 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation: The Task Force for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). , 2018, European heart journal.

[11]  Mitul Patel,et al.  Safety and Feasibility of a Novel, Second-Generation Robotic-Assisted System for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: First-in-Human Report. , 2017, The Journal of invasive cardiology.

[12]  Manish Parikh,et al.  TCT-539 Impact of a Novel Advanced Robotic Wiring Algorithm on Time to Wire a Coronary Artery Bifurcation in a Porcine Model , 2017 .

[13]  Mitul Patel,et al.  Demonstration of the Safety and Feasibility of Robotically Assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Complex Coronary Lesions: Results of the CORA-PCI Study (Complex Robotically Assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention). , 2017, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[14]  R. Madder,et al.  Impact of robotics and a suspended lead suit on physician radiation exposure during percutaneous coronary intervention. , 2017, Cardiovascular revascularization medicine : including molecular interventions.

[15]  R. Madder,et al.  Percutaneous coronary intervention using a combination of robotics and telecommunications by an operator in a separate physical location from the patient: an early exploration into the feasibility of telestenting (the REMOTE-PCI study). , 2017, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[16]  E. Mahmud,et al.  First‐in‐human robotic percutaneous coronary intervention for unprotected left main stenosis , 2016, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[17]  E. Mahmud,et al.  Interoperator and intraoperator (in)accuracy of stent selection based on visual estimation , 2015, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[18]  G. Weisz,et al.  Longitudinal Geographic Miss (LGM) in Robotic Assisted Versus Manual Percutaneous Coronary Interventions. , 2015, Journal of interventional cardiology.

[19]  Paul T. Campbell,et al.  The impact of precise robotic lesion length measurement on stent length selection: ramifications for stent savings. , 2015, Cardiovascular revascularization medicine : including molecular interventions.

[20]  R. Caputo,et al.  SAFETY AND FEASIBILITY OF ROBOTIC PCI UTILIZING RADIAL ARTERIAL ACCESS , 2015 .

[21]  J. Moses,et al.  The association between experience and proficiency with robotic-enhanced coronary intervention—insights from the PRECISE multi-center study , 2014, Acute cardiac care.

[22]  Juan F Granada,et al.  Safety and feasibility of robotic percutaneous coronary intervention: PRECISE (Percutaneous Robotically-Enhanced Coronary Intervention) Study. , 2013, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[23]  Borut Gersak,et al.  A first-in-man study of the role of flexible robotics in overcoming navigation challenges in the iliofemoral arteries. , 2013, Journal of vascular surgery.

[24]  A. Roguin,et al.  Brain malignancies and ionising radiation: more cases reported. , 2012, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[25]  J. Joseph,et al.  Modifications to Facilitate Extraperitoneal Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Post Kidney Transplant , 2012, JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons.

[26]  M. Leon,et al.  First-in-human evaluation of a novel robotic-assisted coronary angioplasty system. , 2011, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[27]  Madan M Rehani,et al.  Risk for radiation‐induced cataract for staff in interventional cardiology: Is there reason for concern? , 2010, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[28]  Madan M Rehani,et al.  Radiation Cataract Risk in Interventional Cardiology Personnel , 2010, Radiation research.

[29]  A. Kirtane,et al.  A RANDOMIZED COMPARISON OF THE ENDEAVOR DRUG (ABT-578) ELUTING STENT VERSUS TAXUS PACLITAXEL-ELUTING STENT IN DIABETIC PATIENTS: THREE-YEAR OUTCOMES FROM ENDEAVOR IV , 2010 .

[30]  P. Fitzgerald,et al.  A randomized comparison of the Endeavor zotarolimus-eluting stent versus the TAXUS paclitaxel-eluting stent in de novo native coronary lesions 12-month outcomes from the ENDEAVOR IV trial. , 2010, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[31]  Theodore A Bass,et al.  Impact of stent deployment procedural factors on long-term effectiveness and safety of sirolimus-eluting stents (final results of the multicenter prospective STLLR trial). , 2008, The American journal of cardiology.

[32]  Madan M. Rehani,et al.  Training of interventional cardiologists in radiation protection--the IAEA's initiatives. , 2007, International journal of cardiology.

[33]  V. Santinelli,et al.  Robotic magnetic navigation for atrial fibrillation ablation. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[34]  Fesc,et al.  Safety of Coronary Sirolimus-Eluting Stents in Daily Clinical Practice: One-Year Follow-Up of the e-Cypher Registry , 2006, Circulation.

[35]  T. Kuntze,et al.  Benefit of the redo mitral valve surgery – minimally invasive approach , 2006 .

[36]  Rafael Beyar,et al.  Remote-control percutaneous coronary interventions: concept, validation, and first-in-humans pilot clinical trial. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[37]  R. Shofti,et al.  Concept, design and pre-clinical studies for remote control percutaneous coronary interventions. , 2005, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[38]  Gregg W Stone,et al.  Comparison of a polymer-based paclitaxel-eluting stent with a bare metal stent in patients with complex coronary artery disease: a randomized controlled trial. , 2005, JAMA.

[39]  M. Anvari,et al.  Establishment of the World's First Telerobotic Remote Surgical Service: For Provision of Advanced Laparoscopic Surgery in a Rural Community , 2005, Annals of surgery.

[40]  Stephen Balter,et al.  ACCF/AHA/HRS/SCAI clinical competence statement on physician knowledge to optimize patient safety and image quality in fluoroscopically guided invasive cardiovascular procedures: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association/American College of Physicians Task , 2005, Circulation.

[41]  Stephen Balter,et al.  Occupational hazards of interventional cardiologists: Prevalence of orthopedic health problems in contemporary practice , 2004, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[42]  Stephen Balter,et al.  ACCF/AHA/HRS/SCAI clinical competence statement on physician knowledge to optimize patient safety and image quality in fluoroscopically guided invasive cardiovascular procedures. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association/American College of Physicians Task , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[43]  William Wijns,et al.  Sirolimus-eluting stents for treatment of patients with long atherosclerotic lesions in small coronary arteries: double-blind, randomised controlled trial (E-SIRIUS) , 2003, The Lancet.

[44]  Jeffrey W Moses,et al.  Sirolimus-eluting stents versus standard stents in patients with stenosis in a native coronary artery. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.

[45]  T Walther,et al.  The Leipzig Experience with Robotic Valve Surgery , 2000, Journal of cardiac surgery.

[46]  F. Mohr,et al.  The evolution of minimally invasive mitral valve surgery 2 year experience 1 Presented at the 12th , 1999 .

[47]  K. Gould,et al.  Patterns in visual interpretation of coronary arteriograms as detected by quantitative coronary arteriography. , 1991, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[48]  S. Hayati,et al.  A robot with improved absolute positioning accuracy for CT guided stereotactic brain surgery , 1988, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[49]  Ariel Roguin,et al.  Brain tumours among interventional cardiologists: a cause for alarm? Report of four new cases from two cities and a review of the literature. , 2012, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[50]  Donald L. Miller,et al.  Occupational health hazards in the interventional laboratory: Time for a safer environment , 2009, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[51]  J. Moses,et al.  Sirolimus-eluting stents vs. standard stents in patients with stenosis in a native coronary artery , 2004 .

[52]  N. Kleiman,et al.  Comparison of quantitative coronary angiography to visual estimates of lesion severity pre and post PTCA. , 1990, American heart journal.