Self-regulated Science Learning with Highly Gifted Students: The role of cognitive, motivational, epistemological, and environmental variables

This research examines the issue of self-regulated learning among highly gifted elementary ( n = 93) and high school students ( n = 40) in science. Self-report measures assessed self-regulatory strategy use in science and a spectrum of environmental (perceived level of investigation) and individual prerequisites (motivational beliefs, goal orientation, epistemological beliefs and intentions). Firstly, high school students were experiencing less investigation in science, and test anxiety and work avoidance were more pronounced than with elementary students. Secondly, highly gifted girls' science-related motivational beliefs were less positive than those of boys. Thirdly, path analyses indicate that the level of investigation in the science learning environment strongly determines motivational and epistemological prerequisites of self-regulatory strategy use. The results indicate that exploration and discovery should be enabled and strengthened in science classrooms of highly gifted students.

[1]  Carol Midgley,et al.  Perceptions of the school psychological environment and early adolescents' psychological and behavioral functioning in school: The mediating role of goals and belonging. , 1996 .

[2]  Albert Ziegler,et al.  Gender Differences in Mathematics and the Sciences: Can Attributional Retraining Improve the Performance of Gifted Females? , 1996 .

[3]  P. Pintrich,et al.  The Development of Epistemological Theories: Beliefs About Knowledge and Knowing and Their Relation to Learning , 1997 .

[4]  T. Bouffard,et al.  A developmental study of the relation between combined learning and performance goals and students' self-regulated learning. , 1998, The British journal of educational psychology.

[5]  B. Zimmerman.  Developing self-fulfilling cycles of academic regulation: An analysis of exemplary instructional models. , 1998 .

[6]  Shai Ben-David,et al.  On self-directed learning , 1995, COLT '95.

[7]  Barry J. Zimmerman,et al.  Self-regulated learning in gifted students. , 1992 .

[8]  P. Pintrich,et al.  Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. , 1990 .

[9]  Marlene Schommer.  Epistemological development and academic performance among secondary students. , 1993 .

[10]  Paul R. Pintrich,et al.  Classroom and Individual Differences in Early Adolescents' Motivation and Self-Regulated Learning , 1994 .

[11]  P. Pintrich,et al.  Students' motivational beliefs and their cognitive engagement in classroom academic tasks. , 1992 .

[12]  Paul Cobb,et al.  Assessment of a problem-centered second-grade mathematics project. , 1991 .

[13]  B. Fraser,et al.  Development and Validation of an Instrument for Assessing the Psychosocial Environment of Computer-Assisted Learning Classrooms , 1995 .

[14]  Marlene Schommer,et al.  Epistemological Beliefs of Gifted High School Students. , 1997 .

[15]  Paul R. Pintrich,et al.  Self-Regulation: Directions and Challenges for Future Research , 2000 .

[16]  Richard C. Anderson,et al.  Schooling and students′ epistemological beliefs about learning , 1993 .

[17]  Barry J. Zimmerman,et al.  Becoming a Self-Regulated Writer: A Social Cognitive Perspective , 1997 .

[18]  K. Lonka,et al.  Epistemologies, conceptions of learning, and study practices in medicine and psychology , 1996 .

[19]  D. Ausubel,et al.  Learning by discovery , 1961 .

[20]  J. Meece,et al.  Students' goal orientations and cognitive engagement in classroom activities , 1988 .

[21]  Karen Strohm Kitchner.  Cognition, Metacognition, and Epistemic Cognition , 1983 .

[22]  Marlene Schommer.  The influence of age and education on epistemological beliefs , 1998 .

[23]  Eric M. Anderman,et al.  Motivation and strategy use in science: Individual differences and classroom effects , 1994 .

[24]  Leona Schauble,et al.  Students' Understanding of the Objectives and Procedures of Experimentation in the Science Classroom , 1995 .

[25]  D. Stipek,et al.  Children's beliefs about intelligence and school performance. , 1996 .

[26]  Joyce VanTassel-Baska,et al.  A National Study of Science Curriculum Effectiveness With High Ability Students , 1998 .

[27]  Shirley L. Yu,et al.  The relation between goal orientation and students' motivational beliefs and self-regulated learning , 1996 .

[28]  W. G. Perry.  Forms of Intellectual and Ethical Development in the College Years: A Scheme. Jossey-Bass Higher and Adult Education Series. , 1970 .

[29]  Kurt A. Heller,et al.  Individual (Learning and Motivational) Needs versus Instructional Conditions of Gifted Education[1] , 1999 .

[30]  J. McCormick,et al.  The Optimal Context for Gifted Students: A Preliminary Exploration of Motivational and Affective Considerations , 1999 .

[31]  D. Dai,et al.  Goal Orientations of Gifted Students , 1996 .

[32]  Marlene Schommer,et al.  A comparison of epistemological beliefs between gifted and non‐gifted high school students , 1994 .

[33]  Paul R. Pintrich,et al.  Contextual differences in student motivation and self-regulated learning in mathematics, English, and social studies classrooms , 1998 .

[34]  C. Midgley,et al.  Development during adolescence. The impact of stage-environment fit on young adolescents' experiences in schools and in families. , 1993, The American psychologist.

[35]  Eric M. Anderman,et al.  Differences between Elementary and Middle School Teachers and Students: A Goal Theory Approach , 1995 .

[36]  K. E. Ablard,et al.  Self-regulated learning in high-achieving students: Relations to advanced reasoning, achievement goals, and gender. , 1998 .

[37]  B. Zimmerman,et al.  Student Differences in Self-Regulated Learning: Relating Grade, Sex, and Giftedness to Self-Efficacy and Strategy Use. , 1990 .