Validity of Different Activity Monitors to Count Steps in an Inpatient Rehabilitation Setting

Background Commonly used activity monitors have been shown to be accurate in counting steps in active people; however, further validation is needed in slower walking populations. Objectives To determine the validity of activity monitors for measuring step counts in rehabilitation inpatients compared with visually observed step counts. To explore the influence of gait parameters, activity monitor position, and use of walkers on activity monitor accuracy. Methods One hundred and sixty-six inpatients admitted to a rehabilitation unit with an average walking speed of 0.4 m/s (SD 0.2) wore 16 activity monitors (7 different devices in different positions) simultaneously during 6-minute and 6-m walks. The number of steps taken during the tests was also counted by a physical therapist. Gait parameters were assessed using the GAITRite system. To analyze the influence of different gait parameters, the percentage accuracy for each monitor was graphed against various gait parameters for each activity monitor. Results The StepWatch, Fitbit One worn on the ankle and the ActivPAL showed excellent agreement with observed step count (ICC 2,1 0.98; 0.92; 0.78 respectively). Other devices (Fitbit Charge, Fitbit One worn on hip, G-Sensor, Garmin Vivofit, Actigraph) showed poor agreement with the observed step count (ICC 2,1 0.12-0.40). Percentage agreement with observed step count was highest for the StepWatch (mean 98%). The StepWatch and the Fitbit One worn on the ankle maintained accuracy in individuals who walked more slowly and with shorter strides but other devices were less accurate in these individuals. Limitations There were small numbers of participants for some gait parameters. Conclusions The StepWatch showed the highest accuracy and closest agreement with observed step count. This device can be confidently used by researchers for accurate measurement of step counts in inpatient rehabilitation in individuals who walk slowly. If immediate feedback is desired, the Fitbit One when worn on the ankle would be the best choice for this population.

[1]  George D Fulk,et al.  Accuracy of 2 Activity Monitors in Detecting Steps in People With Stroke and Traumatic Brain Injury , 2013, Physical Therapy.

[2]  P. Dario,et al.  Design strategies to improve patient motivation during robot-aided rehabilitation , 2007, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[3]  J. Carr,et al.  Neurological Rehabilitation: Optimizing Motor Performance , 2003 .

[4]  I-Min Lee,et al.  Using accelerometers to measure physical activity in large-scale epidemiological studies: issues and challenges , 2013, British Journal of Sports Medicine.

[5]  Malcolm H Granat,et al.  Activity-monitor accuracy in measuring step number and cadence in community-dwelling older adults. , 2008, Journal of aging and physical activity.

[6]  C. Sherrington,et al.  Exercise dose and mobility outcome in a comprehensive stroke unit: description and prediction from a prospective cohort study. , 2012, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[7]  J. Schwartz,et al.  Abstract MP11: Fitbit: An Accurate and Reliable Device for Wireless Physical Activity Tracking , 2015 .

[8]  C. Sherrington,et al.  Amount of Exercise in the First Week After Stroke Predicts Walking Speed and Unassisted Walking , 2012, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[9]  M. Hallett,et al.  Rapid plasticity of human cortical movement representation induced by practice. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  Catherine Sherrington,et al.  Validity of the Fitbit activity tracker for measuring steps in community-dwelling older adults , 2015, BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine.

[11]  Thierry Troosters,et al.  Validity of activity monitors in health and chronic disease: a systematic review , 2012, International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity.

[12]  Kevin A Hallgren,et al.  Computing Inter-Rater Reliability for Observational Data: An Overview and Tutorial. , 2012, Tutorials in quantitative methods for psychology.

[13]  Marie Johnston,et al.  The use of pedometers in stroke survivors: are they feasible and how well do they detect steps? , 2012, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[14]  M. Granat,et al.  The validity and reliability of a novel activity monitor as a measure of walking , 2006, British Journal of Sports Medicine.

[15]  A. Kriska,et al.  Gait speed and step-count monitor accuracy in community-dwelling older adults. , 2008, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[16]  Catherine E Lang,et al.  Counting Repetitions: An Observational Study of Outpatient Therapy for People with Hemiparesis Post-Stroke , 2007, Journal of neurologic physical therapy : JNPT.

[17]  R. Adams,et al.  A dose-response relationship between amount of weight-bearing exercise and walking outcome following cerebrovascular accident. , 1994, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[18]  Dennis R. Louie,et al.  “Stepping Up” Activity Poststroke: Ankle-Positioned Accelerometer Can Accurately Record Steps During Slow Walking , 2015, Physical Therapy.

[19]  K. Mauritz,et al.  Repetitive training of isolated movements improves the outcome of motor rehabilitation of the centrally paretic hand , 1995, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[20]  Michael W. Beets,et al.  Measurement of physical activity in older adult interventions: a systematic review , 2015, British Journal of Sports Medicine.

[21]  D. Reisman,et al.  Observation of amounts of movement practice provided during stroke rehabilitation. , 2009, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[22]  Mark Latt,et al.  Reliability of the GAITRite walkway system for the quantification of temporo-spatial parameters of gait in young and older people. , 2004, Gait & posture.

[23]  K. Volpp,et al.  Accuracy of smartphone applications and wearable devices for tracking physical activity data. , 2015, JAMA.

[24]  Shaw Bronner,et al.  Comparison of steps and energy expenditure assessment in adults of Fitbit Tracker and Ultra to the Actical and indirect calorimetry , 2013, Journal of medical engineering & technology.

[25]  C. Sherrington,et al.  Many participants in inpatient rehabilitation can quantify their exercise dosage accurately: an observational study. , 2011, Journal of physiotherapy.