To generalize or not to generalize: spatial categories are influenced by physical attributes and language.

The current work explored the conditions under which infants generalize spatial relationships from one event to another. English-learning 5-month-olds habituated to a tight- or loose-fit covering event dishabituated to a change in fit during a containment test event, but infants habituated to a visually similar occlusion event did not. Thus, infants' responses appeared to be driven by the physical nature of the fit rather than visual similarity. This response pattern was replicated with Korean-speaking adults, but English-speaking adults showed no sensitivity to change in fit for either event. These findings suggest that language development links linguistic forms to universal, pre-existing representations of meaning, and that linguistic experience can shape sensitivity to distinctions that are marked in one's native language.

[1]  Denise Brandão de Oliveira e Britto,et al.  The faculty of language , 2007 .

[2]  Margarita Kaushanskaya,et al.  The Language Experience and Proficiency Questionnaire (LEAP-Q): assessing language profiles in bilinguals and multilinguals. , 2007, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[3]  A. Wierzbicka,et al.  Semantics and cognition. , 2006, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science.

[4]  R. Baillargeon,et al.  Detecting continuity violations in infancy: a new account and new evidence from covering and tube events , 2005, Cognition.

[5]  Susan J. Hespos,et al.  Conceptual precursors to language , 2004, Nature.

[6]  R. Baillargeon.  Infants' Physical World , 2004 .

[7]  Laurie R Santos.  'Core knowledges': a dissociation between spatiotemporal knowledge and contact-mechanics in a non-human primate? , 2004, Developmental science.

[8]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  The faculty of language: what is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? , 2002, Science.

[9]  S. Levinson,et al.  Returning the tables: language affects spatial reasoning , 2002, Cognition.

[10]  Marc D. Hauser,et al.  A non-human primate’s understanding of solidity: dissociations between seeing and acting , 2002 .

[11]  L. Gleitman,et al.  Turning the tables: language and spatial reasoning , 2002, Cognition.

[12]  Renée Baillargeon,et al.  Event categorization in infancy , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[13]  Barbara Landau,et al.  Spatial language and spatial representation: a cross-linguistic comparison , 2001, Cognition.

[14]  L. Boroditsky.  Does Language Shape Thought?: Mandarin and English Speakers' Conceptions of Time , 2001, Cognitive Psychology.

[15]  Susan J. Hespos,et al.  Infants' Knowledge About Occlusion and Containment Events: A Surprising Discrepancy , 2001, Psychological science.

[16]  Susan J. Hespos,et al.  Reasoning about containment events in very young infants , 2001, Cognition.

[17]  C. Sinha,et al.  Language, culture, and the embodiment of spatial cognition , 2001 .

[18]  C. Chiu,et al.  Multicultural minds. A dynamic constructivist approach to culture and cognition. , 2000, The American psychologist.

[19]  D. Slobin.  Verbalized events: A dynamic approach to linguistic relativity and determinism , 2000 .

[20]  R. Baillargeon,et al.  2.5-Month-Old Infants' Reasoning about When Objects Should and Should Not Be Occluded , 1999, Cognitive Psychology.

[21]  Angela Y. Lee,et al.  “I” Value Freedom, but “We” Value Relationships: Self-Construal Priming Mirrors Cultural Differences in Judgment , 1999 .

[22]  Marc D. Hauser,et al.  A nonhuman primate's expectations about object motion and destination: The importance of self-propelled movement and animacy , 1998 .

[23]  B. Landau,et al.  “What” and “where” in spatial language and spatial cognition , 1993 .

[24]  Amy Needham,et al.  Intuitions about support in 4.5-month-old infants , 1993, Cognition.

[25]  E. Spelke,et al.  Origins of knowledge. , 1992, Psychological review.

[26]  M. Bowerman,et al.  Learning to express motion events in English and Korean: The influence of language-specific lexicalization patterns , 1991, Cognition.

[27]  R. Baillargeon,et al.  Object permanence in young infants: further evidence. , 1991, Child development.

[28]  R. Shepard.  Ecological constraints on internal representation: resonant kinematics of perceiving, imagining, thinking, and dreaming. , 1984, Psychological review.

[29]  H. Pick,et al.  Spatial orientation : theory, research, and application , 1984 .

[30]  David B. Pisoni,et al.  Some effects of laboratory training on identification and discrimination of voicing contrasts in stop consonants. , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[31]  B. L. Whorf.  Language, Thought, and Reality: Selected Writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf , 1956 .

[32]  Marianella Casasola,et al.  Can language do the driving? The effect of linguistic input on infants' categorization of support spatial relations. , 2005, Developmental psychology.

[33]  M. Hickmann.  Language And Cognition In Development: Old Questions, New Directions , 2001 .

[34]  M. Bowerman.  Learning how to structure space for language: A crosslinguistic perspective , 1996 .

[35]  Stephen C. Levinson,et al.  Relativity in spatial conception and description , 1996 .

[36]  Patricia K. Kuhl,et al.  Psychoacoustics and speech perception: Internal standards, perceptual anchors, and prototypes. , 1992 .

[37]  Elizabeth S. Spelke,et al.  Principles of Object Perception , 1990, Cogn. Sci..

[38]  M. Bornstein.  Habituation of attention as a measure of visual information processing in human infants: Summary , 1985 .

[39]  Norman A. Krasnegor,et al.  Measurement of Audition and Vision in the First Year of Postnatal Life: A Methodological Overview , 1985 .

[40]  J. Werker,et al.  Cross-language speech perception: Evidence for perceptual reorganization during the first year of life , 1984 .

[41]  Leonard Talmy,et al.  How Language Structures Space , 1983 .

[42]  J. Gibson.  The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1979 .