Observer efficiency in discrimination tasks Simulating Malignant and benign breast lesions imaged with ultrasound

We investigate and extend the ideal observer methodology developed by Smith and Wagner to detection and discrimination tasks related to breast sonography. We provide a numerical approach for evaluating the ideal observer acting on radio frequency (RF) frame data, which involves inversion of large nonstationary covariance matrices, and we describe a power-series approach to computing this inverse. Considering a truncated power series suggests that the RF data be Wiener-filtered before forming the final envelope image. We have compared human performance for Wiener-filtered and conventional B-mode envelope images using psychophysical studies for 5 tasks related to breast cancer classification. We find significant improvements in visual detection and discrimination efficiency in four of these five tasks. We also use the Smith-Wagner approach to distinguish between human and processing inefficiencies, and find that generally the principle limitation comes from the information lost in computing the final envelope image.

[1]  J. L. Harris Resolving Power and Decision Theory , 1964 .

[2]  Robert N. McDonough,et al.  Detection of signals in noise , 1971 .

[3]  M P Eckstein,et al.  Visual signal detection in structured backgrounds. II. Effects of contrast gain control, background variations, and white noise. , 1997, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[4]  A E Burgess,et al.  Visual signal detection. IV. Observer inconsistency. , 1988, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[5]  Michael F. Insana,et al.  Visual detection efficiency in ultrasonic imaging: A framework for objective assessment of image quality , 1994 .

[6]  M. J. van de Vijver,et al.  Diagnosis of breast cancer: contribution of US as an adjunct to mammography. , 1999, Radiology.

[7]  J A Jensen,et al.  Deconvolution of Ultrasound Images , 1992, Ultrasonic imaging.

[8]  Harrison H. Barrett,et al.  Foundations of Image Science , 2003, J. Electronic Imaging.

[9]  M Fatemi,et al.  Ultrasonic B-scan imaging: theory of image formation and a technique for restoration. , 1980, Ultrasonic imaging.

[10]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Statistical properties of radio-frequency and envelope-detected signals with applications to medical ultrasound. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[11]  Gene H. Golub,et al.  Matrix computations (3rd ed.) , 1996 .

[12]  D. M. Green,et al.  Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .

[13]  J. Swets Signal detection and recognition by human observers : contemporary readings , 1964 .

[14]  C E Metz,et al.  Variance-component modeling in the analysis of receiver operating characteristic index estimates. , 1997, Academic radiology.

[15]  A E Burgess,et al.  Visual signal detection. II. Signal-location identification. , 1984, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[16]  Rafael C. González,et al.  Digital image processing, 3rd Edition , 2008 .

[17]  M P Eckstein,et al.  Visual signal detection in structured backgrounds. I. Effect of number of possible spatial locations and signal contrast. , 1996, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[18]  A. Burgess,et al.  Human observer detection experiments with mammograms and power-law noise. , 2001, Medical physics.

[19]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Statistics of Speckle in Ultrasound B-Scans , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Sonics and Ultrasonics.

[20]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Low Contrast Sensitivity of Radiologic, CT, Nuclear Medicine, and Ultrasound Medical Imaging Systems , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[21]  T. M. Kolb,et al.  Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations. , 2002, Radiology.

[22]  J. Goodman Statistical Properties of Laser Speckle Patterns , 1963 .

[23]  C. M. Wardleworth,et al.  Breast sonography. , 1986, Radiography.

[24]  H. Ermert,et al.  An ultrasound research interface for a clinical system , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[25]  T. M. Kolb,et al.  Occult cancer in women with dense breasts: detection with screening US--diagnostic yield and tumor characteristics. , 1998, Radiology.

[26]  Pavel Crystal,et al.  Using sonography to screen women with mammographically dense breasts. , 2003, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[27]  Theodore G. Birdsall,et al.  Definitions of d′ and η as Psychophysical Measures , 1958 .

[28]  Rafael C. González,et al.  Local Determination of a Moving Contrast Edge , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[29]  H H Barrett,et al.  Objective assessment of image quality: effects of quantum noise and object variability. , 1990, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[30]  E A Krupinski,et al.  The influence of a perceptually linearized display on observer performance and visual search. , 2000, Academic radiology.

[31]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Low Contrast Detectability and Contrast/Detail Analysis in Medical Ultrasound , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Sonics and Ultrasonics.

[32]  Robert F. Wagner,et al.  Quadratic Tasks And The Ideal Observer , 1987, Medical Imaging.

[33]  Craig K. Abbey,et al.  Detection performance theory for ultrasound imaging systems , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[34]  E. Jakeman,et al.  Speckle Statistics With A Small Number Of Scatterers , 1980, Optics & Photonics.

[35]  M. O'Donnell,et al.  Coded excitation system for improving the penetration of real-time phased-array imaging systems , 1992, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[36]  A. Burgess Comparison of receiver operating characteristic and forced choice observer performance measurement methods. , 1995, Medical physics.

[37]  Mostafa Fatemi,et al.  Ultrasonic B-Scan Imaging: Theory of Image Formation and a Technique for Restoration1 , 1980 .

[38]  Gene H. Golub,et al.  Matrix computations , 1983 .

[39]  J. Liu,et al.  Observer efficiency in discrimination tasks simulating malignant and benign breast lesions with ultrasound , 2004, Conference Record of the Thirty-Eighth Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers, 2004..

[40]  D G Pelli,et al.  Uncertainty explains many aspects of visual contrast detection and discrimination. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[41]  M P Eckstein,et al.  Improving detection of coronary morphological features from digital angiograms. Effect of stenosis-stabilized display. , 1994, Circulation.

[42]  Matthew A. Kupinski,et al.  Objective Assessment of Image Quality , 2005 .

[43]  Craig K. Abbey,et al.  Pre-envelope deconvolution for increased lesion detection efficiency in ultrasonic imaging , 2003, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[44]  M.F. Insana,et al.  Linear system models for ultrasonic imaging: application to signal statistics , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.