Prenatal diagnosis using interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH): 2‐year multi‐center retrospective study and review of the literature

Since 1993, the position of the American College of Medical Genetics (ACMG) has been that prenatal interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is investigational. In 1997, the FDA cleared the AneuVysion® assay (Vysis, Inc.) to enumerate chromosomes 13, 18, 21, X and Y for prenatal diagnosis. Data is presented from the clinical trial that led to regulatory clearance (1379 pregnancies) and from retrospective case review on 5197 new pregnancies. These studies demonstrated an extremely high concordance rate between FISH and standard cytogenetics (99.8%) for specific abnormalities that the AneuVysion assay is designed to detect. In 29 039 informative testing events (6576 new and 22 463 cases in the literature) only one false positive (false positive rate=0.003%) and seven false negative results (false negative rate=0.024%) occurred. A historical review of all known accounts of specimens tested is presented (29 039 using AneuVysion and 18 275 specimens tested with other probes). These performance characteristics support a prenatal management strategy that includes utilization of FISH for prenatal testing when a diagnosis of aneuploidy of chromosome 13, 18, 21, X or Y is highly suspected by virtue of maternal age, positive maternal serum biochemical screening or abnormal ultrasound findings. Copyright © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  H. Willard,et al.  Isolation and characterization of an alphoid centromeric repeat family from the human Y chromosome. , 1985, Journal of molecular biology.

[2]  E. Beinder,et al.  Aneuploidiediagnostik mittels Fluoreszenz-in-situ-Hybridisierung (FISH); Stellenwert bei Schwangerschaften mit erhöhtem Risiko für Chromosomenaberrationen , 2000 .

[3]  R. Pike Technical and clinical assessment of fluorescence in situ hybridization: An ACMG/ASHG position statement. I. Technical considerations: Test and Technology Transfer Committee , 2000, Genetics in Medicine.

[4]  J. Philip,et al.  PRENATAL DETECTION OF CHROMOSOME ANEUPLOIDIES BY FLUORESCENCE IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION: EXPERIENCE WITH 2000 UNCULTURED AMNIOTIC FLUID SAMPLES IN A PROSPECTIVE PRECLINICAL TRIAL , 1997 .

[5]  B. Thilaganathan,et al.  Effectiveness of prenatal chromosomal analysis using multicolour fluorescent in situ hybridisation , 2000, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[6]  L. Taine,et al.  False‐negative results of trisomy 21 on direct analysis on chorionic villus sampling , 1998, Prenatal diagnosis.

[7]  J. Epplen,et al.  False‐negative finding in rapid interphase FISH analysis of uncultured amniotic cells , 1999, Prenatal diagnosis.

[8]  J. Gray,et al.  A degenerate alpha satellite probe, detecting a centromeric deletion on chromosome 21 in an apparently normal human male, shows limitations of the use of satellite DNA probes for interphase ploidy analysis. , 1992, Analytical cellular pathology : the journal of the European Society for Analytical Cellular Pathology.

[9]  W. Holzgreve,et al.  Fluorescent in situ hybridization utilization for high-risk prenatal diagnosis: a trade-off among speed, expense, and inherent limitations of chromosome-specific probes. , 1994, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[10]  A. B. Reese Tumors of the eye , 1976 .

[11]  J W Gray,et al.  Cytogenetic analysis using quantitative, high-sensitivity, fluorescence hybridization. , 1986, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  E. Pergament,et al.  The clinical application of interphase FISH in prenatal diagnosis , 2000, Prenatal diagnosis.

[13]  G. Dewald,et al.  Prenatal detection of aneuploidy by directly labeled multicolored probes and interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization. , 1998, Mayo Clinic proceedings.

[14]  T. N. Abdella,et al.  Genetic amniocentesis: a twelve years' experience. , 1985, American journal of medical genetics.

[15]  K. Kennedy,et al.  The need to reevaluate trisomy screening for advanced maternal age in prenatal diagnosis. , 1993, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[16]  K. Klinger,et al.  Multicolor fluorescence in situ hybridization for the simultaneous detection of probe sets for chromosomes 13, 18, 21, X and Y in uncultured amniotic fluid cells. , 1992, Human molecular genetics.

[17]  E. Pergament,et al.  Hybridization of chromosome 18 alpha‐satellite DNA probe to chromosome 22 , 1998, Prenatal diagnosis.

[18]  G. Robinson,et al.  Impact of prenatal testing on maternal-fetal bonding: chorionic villus sampling versus amniocentesis. , 1991, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[19]  P. Lewin,et al.  Defining the efficiency of fluorescence in situ hybridization on uncultured amniocytes on a retrospective cohort of 27407 prenatal diagnoses , 2000, Prenatal diagnosis.

[20]  J. Oury,et al.  Evaluation of X, Y, 18, and 13/21 alpha satellite DNA probes for interphase cytogenetic analysis of uncultured amniocytes by fluorescence in situ hybridization , 1994, Prenatal diagnosis.

[21]  J. R. Beekhuis,et al.  The predictive value of cytogenetic diagnosis after CVS: 1500 cases , 1990, Prenatal diagnosis.

[22]  K. Klinger,et al.  Rapid prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal aneuploidies by fluorescence in situ hybridization: clinical experience with 4,500 specimens. , 1993, American journal of human genetics.

[23]  K. Klinger,et al.  Rapid detection of chromosome aneuploidies in uncultured amniocytes by using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). , 1992, American journal of human genetics.

[24]  C. Epstein,et al.  Prenatal genetic diagnosis in 3000 amniocenteses. , 1979, The New England journal of medicine.

[25]  S. R. Young,et al.  Low fluorescence alpha satellite region yields negative result , 1992, Prenatal diagnosis.

[26]  C. Strom,et al.  Cross‐hybridization of the chromosome 13/21 alpha satellite DNA probe to chromosome 22 in the prenatal screening of common chromosomal aneuploidies by fish , 1995, Prenatal diagnosis.

[27]  R. Lebo,et al.  Rapid aneuploid diagnosis of high-risk fetuses by fluorescence in situ hybridization. , 1996, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[28]  G. Barkai,et al.  Use of interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization in third trimester fetuses with anomalies and growth retardation. , 1999, American journal of medical genetics.

[29]  A. Tóth,et al.  Cross-hybridization of the chromosome 13/21 alpha satellite DNA to chromosome 22 or a rare polymorphism? , 1997, Prenatal diagnosis.

[30]  K. Nicolaides,et al.  International, collaborative assessment of 146,000 prenatal karyotypes: expected limitations if only chromosome-specific probes and fluorescent in-situ hybridization are used. , 1999, Human reproduction.

[31]  N. Uddenberg,et al.  Prenatal diagnosis for psychological reasons: Comparison with other indications, advanced maternal age and known genetic risk , 1990, Prenatal diagnosis.

[32]  K. Bink,et al.  [Interphase FISH test as a rapid test for trisomies in amniotic fluid--results of a prospective study]. , 2000, Zeitschrift für Geburtshilfe und Neonatologie.

[33]  F. Malone,et al.  Defining the role of fluorescence in situ hybridization on uncultured amniocytes for prenatal diagnosis of aneuploidies. , 1997, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[34]  S. Mercier,et al.  Prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal aneuploidies by fluorescence in situ hybridization on uncultured amniotic cells: experience with 630 samples. , 1995, Annales de genetique.

[35]  B. Eiben,et al.  Rapid Prenatal Diagnosis of Aneuploidies in Uncultured Amniocytes by Fluorescence in situ Hybridization , 1999, Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy.

[36]  Two years' prospective experience using fluorescence in situ hybridization on uncultured amniotic fluid cells for rapid prenatal diagnosis of common chromosomal aneuploidies , 1999, Prenatal diagnosis.

[37]  S. Michie,et al.  The psychological effects of false‐positive results in prenatal screening for fetal abnormality: A prospective study , 1992, Prenatal diagnosis.

[38]  A. N. Lamb,et al.  Overwhelming maternal cell contamination in amniotic fluid samples from patients with oligohydramnios can lead to false prenatal interphase FISH results , 1999, Prenatal diagnosis.

[39]  B. Ward,et al.  MATERNAL CELL CONTAMINATION IN UNCULTURED AMNIOTIC FLUID , 1996, Prenatal diagnosis.

[40]  M. Evans,et al.  Routine prenatal diagnosis of aneuploidy by FISH studies in high-risk pregnancies. , 2000, American journal of medical genetics.

[41]  K. Klinger,et al.  Prenatal detection of chromosome aneuploidies in uncultured chorionic villus samples by FISH. , 1996, American journal of human genetics.

[42]  Y. Lam,et al.  Clinical significance of amniotic‐fluid‐cell culture failure , 1998, Prenatal Diagnosis.

[43]  J. Wauters,et al.  Incidence of low-fluorescence alpha satellite region on chromosome 21 escaping detection of aneuploidy at interphase by FISH. , 1995, Cytogenetics and Cell Genetics.

[44]  W. Sepulveda,et al.  Amniotic fluid culture failure: clinical significance and association with aneuploidy , 1996, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[45]  S. Dyack,et al.  Risk of false‐positive prenatal diagnosis using interphase FISH testing: hybridization of alpha‐satellite X probe to chromosome 19 , 1999, Prenatal diagnosis.

[46]  A. Seres-Santamaria,et al.  Fluorescent in-situ hybridisation and Down's syndrome , 1993, The Lancet.

[47]  D. Spathas,et al.  Prenatal detection of trisomy 21 in uncultured amniocytes by fluorescence in situ hybridization: A prospective study , 1994, Prenatal diagnosis.

[48]  R. Verma,et al.  Variations in alphoid DNA sequences escape detection of aneuploidy at interphase by FISH technique. , 1992, Genomics.

[49]  D. Van Opstal,et al.  False‐negative findings in chorionic villi , 1999, Prenatal Diagnosis.

[50]  R. Glazier,et al.  Psychological outcomes following maternal serum screening: a cohort study. , 1998, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.

[51]  D. Ledbetter,et al.  The safety and efficacy of chorionic villus sampling for early prenatal diagnosis of cytogenetic abnormalities. , 1989, The New England journal of medicine.

[52]  P. Devilee,et al.  Two subsets of human alphoid repetitive DNA show distinct preferential localization in the pericentric regions of chromosomes 13, 18, and 21. , 1986, Cytogenetics and cell genetics.