Selective attention to real-world objects drives their emotional appraisal

[1]  Craig S. Chapman,et al.  Models, movements, and minds: bridging the gap between decision making and action , 2020, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[2]  Agnieszka M. Nowik,et al.  The neural underpinnings of haptically guided functional grasping of tools: An fMRI study , 2019, NeuroImage.

[3]  Daniel Baldauf,et al.  Visual Selection of the Future Reach Path in Obstacle Avoidance , 2018, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[4]  M. Fenske,et al.  Affective evidence that inhibition is involved in separating accessory representations from active representations in visual working memory , 2018, Visual Cognition.

[5]  Michel F. Failing,et al.  Selection history: How reward modulates selectivity of visual attention , 2017, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[6]  M. Fenske,et al.  Neural evidence that inhibition is linked to the affective devaluation of distractors that match the contents of working memory , 2017, Neuropsychologia.

[7]  Craig S. Chapman,et al.  Reaching reveals that best-versus-rest processing contributes to biased decision making. , 2017, Acta psychologica.

[8]  A. Dijksterhuis,et al.  How does not responding to appetitive stimuli cause devaluation: Evaluative conditioning or response inhibition? , 2016, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[9]  B. Anderson.  The attention habit: how reward learning shapes attentional selection , 2016, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[10]  Seth B. Agyei,et al.  Development of Visual Motion Perception for Prospective Control: Brain and Behavioral Studies in Infants , 2016, Front. Psychol..

[11]  Craig S. Chapman,et al.  The snooze of lose: Rapid reaching reveals that losses are processed more slowly than gains. , 2015, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[12]  Z. Estes,et al.  Touch and go: merely grasping a product facilitates brand perception and choice , 2015 .

[13]  Jacqueline C. Snow,et al.  Real-world objects are more memorable than photographs of objects , 2014, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[14]  Jason P. Gallivan,et al.  Three-dimensional reach trajectories as a probe of real-time decision-making between multiple competing targets , 2014, Front. Neurosci..

[15]  A. Gallace,et al.  Effects of Arm Crossing on Spatial Perspective-Taking , 2014, PloS one.

[16]  P. Gollwitzer,et al.  Distractor devaluation in a flanker task: object-specific effects without distractor recognition memory. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[17]  Ashleigh M. Hover,et al.  Changing value through cued approach: An automatic mechanism of behavior change , 2014, Nature Neuroscience.

[18]  Anna Schubö,et al.  Modulation of visual attention by object affordance , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[19]  W. Stroebe,et al.  Stop signals decrease choices for palatable foods through decreased food evaluation , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[20]  L. Chelazzi,et al.  Rewards teach visual selective attention , 2013, Vision Research.

[21]  H. Aarts,et al.  Using stop signals to inhibit chronic dieters' responses toward palatable foods. , 2011, Behaviour research and therapy.

[22]  Jody C. Culham,et al.  Bringing the real world into the fMRI scanner: Repetition effects for pictures versus real objects , 2011, Scientific reports.

[23]  Patryk A. Laurent,et al.  Value-driven attentional capture , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[24]  Jody C. Culham,et al.  Mental blocks: fMRI reveals top-down modulation of early visual cortex when obstacles interfere with grasp planning , 2011, Neuropsychologia.

[25]  Ian Krajbich,et al.  Visual fixations and the computation and comparison of value in simple choice , 2010, Nature Neuroscience.

[26]  D. Lloyd,et al.  Right hand presence modulates shifts of exogenous visuospatial attention in near perihand space , 2010, Brain and Cognition.

[27]  H. Deubel,et al.  Attentional landscapes in reaching and grasping , 2010, Vision Research.

[28]  S. Tipper,et al.  Sensorimotor fluency influences affect: Evidence from electromyography , 2010 .

[29]  J. Peck,et al.  The Effect of Mere Touch on Perceived Ownership , 2009 .

[30]  Brian A. Goolsby,et al.  Distractor devaluation requires visual working memory , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[31]  Oren Griffiths,et al.  Negative priming reduces affective ratings , 2008 .

[32]  S. Tipper,et al.  Self produced and observed actions influence emotion: the roles of action fluency and eye gaze , 2008, Psychological research.

[33]  Harm Veling,et al.  When approach motivation and behavioral inhibition collide: Behavior regulation through stimulus devaluation , 2018 .

[34]  Daniel N. Bub,et al.  Language-Based Access to Gestural Components of Conceptual Knowledge , 2008, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[35]  Denis G. Pelli,et al.  ECVP '07 Abstracts , 2007, Perception.

[36]  John G. Taylor,et al.  Efficient Attentional Selection Predicts Distractor Devaluation: Event-related Potential Evidence for a Direct Link between Attention and Emotion , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[37]  A. van Knippenberg,et al.  Devaluation of distracting stimuli , 2007 .

[38]  Jane E. Raymond,et al.  Affective Influences of Selective Attention , 2006 .

[39]  Heiner Deubel,et al.  Deployment of visual attention before sequences of goal-directed hand movements , 2006, Vision Research.

[40]  Jane E Raymond,et al.  Emotional devaluation of distracting patterns and faces: a consequence of attentional inhibition during visual search? , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[41]  Melina A. Kunar,et al.  The affective consequences of visual attention in preview search , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[42]  D. Elliott,et al.  Movement Trajectories in the Presence of a Distracting Stimulus: Evidence for a Response Activation Model of Selective Reaching , 2004, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[43]  Jane E Raymond,et al.  Selective Attention Determines Emotional Responses to Novel Visual Stimuli , 2003, Psychological science.

[44]  R. Compton,et al.  Hemispheric Differences in Affective Response: Effects of Mere Exposure , 2002 .

[45]  R. Johansson,et al.  Eye–Hand Coordination in Object Manipulation , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[46]  S. Tipper,et al.  Selective Reaching to Grasp: Evidence for Distractor Interference Effects , 1997 .

[47]  K Nakayama,et al.  Visual attention to surfaces in three-dimensional space. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[48]  Arthur F. Kramer,et al.  Limits of focused attention in three-dimensional space , 1993, Perception & psychophysics.

[49]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Rudimentary determinants of attitudes. II: Arm flexion and extension have differential effects on attitudes. , 1993, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[50]  S. Tipper,et al.  Hand deviations away from visual cues: Indirect evidence for inhibition , 2006, Experimental Brain Research.

[51]  Heiner Deubel,et al.  Attentional selection in sequential manual movements, movements around an obstacle and in grasping , 2005 .

[52]  M. Kinsbourne.  Mechanisms of Unilateral Neglect , 1987 .

[53]  J. Gibson.  The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1979 .

[54]  B. Tversky,et al.  When Far Becomes Near: Perspective Taking Induces Social Remapping of Spatial Relations , 2022 .