Evolution of B2B Platform Ecosystems: What Can Be Learned from Salesforce?

Platform ecosystems are complex ecologies of firms with individual competencies and collective objectives. The sustainable evolution of platform ecosystems is thereby contingent on taking advantage of the individual competencies of the ecosystem’s actors toward obtaining collective objectives. To learn more about platform ecosystem evolution and dynamics, we study Salesforce, a leading and thriving B2B platform ecosystem. We find that the ecosystem’s evolution was closely defined not only by the platform owner’s orchestrating initiatives, but also by its complementors’ and customers’ competencies and particularities. Specifically, we derive three distinct dimensions of evolution, namely the extension of the platform core technology, the extension of the platform’s functional scope, and the industry-specific specialization of the platform. We further identify three cross-dimension levers, namely proprietary developments, acquisitions, as well as partnerships and alliances, which were employed by the platform owner to drive its platform ecosystem’s evolution.

[1]  Annabelle Gawer,et al.  Digital platforms for development: Foundations and research agenda , 2021, Inf. Syst. J..

[2]  A. Gawer Platforms, Markets and Innovation , 2011 .

[3]  M. Markus,et al.  Information technology and organizational change: causal structure in theory and research , 1988 .

[4]  A. Gawer Bridging differing perspectives on technological platforms: Toward an integrative framework , 2014 .

[5]  Lawrence B. Mohr,et al.  Explaining organizational behavior , 1982 .

[6]  Helmut Krcmar,et al.  The Platform Owner’s Challenge to Capture Value – Insights from a Business-to-Business IT Platform , 2017, ICIS 2017.

[7]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Managing identity tensions during mobile ecosystem evolution , 2015, J. Inf. Technol..

[8]  Youngjin Yoo,et al.  The Co-Evolution of Digital Ecosystems , 2016, ICIS.

[9]  Tobias Kretschmer,et al.  Platform Architecture, Multihoming and Complement Quality: Evidence from the U.S. Video Game Industry , 2018, Inf. Syst. Res..

[10]  K. Eisenhardt Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[11]  Keith Walley,et al.  Coopetition: An Introduction to the Subject and an Agenda for Research , 2007 .

[12]  Helmut Krcmar,et al.  Value co-creation practices in business-to-business platform ecosystems , 2019, Electronic Markets.

[13]  Jungsuk Oh,et al.  Value appropriation between the platform provider and app developers in mobile platform mediated networks , 2015, J. Inf. Technol..

[14]  Melissa A. Schilling,et al.  Platform Competition: A Systematic and Interdisciplinary Review of the Literature , 2020, Journal of Management.

[15]  Mark de Reuver,et al.  The digital platform: a research agenda , 2018, J. Inf. Technol..

[16]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Research Commentary - Digital Infrastructures: The Missing IS Research Agenda , 2010, Inf. Syst. Res..

[17]  J. F. Moore,et al.  Predators and prey: a new ecology of competition. , 1993, Harvard business review.

[18]  Cheng Zhang,et al.  The Ecosystem of Software Platform: A Study of Asymmetric Cross-Side Network Effects and Platform Governance , 2018, MIS Q..

[19]  Stephan Aier,et al.  Design principles for digital value co-creation networks: a service-dominant logic perspective , 2019, Electronic Markets.

[20]  Robert Winter,et al.  A Value Co-creation Perspective on Information Systems Analysis and Design , 2018, Business & Information Systems Engineering.

[21]  Melissa A. Schilling,et al.  Platform Competition: A Systematic and Interdisciplinary Review of the Literature , 2020, Journal of Management.

[22]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Organizing for Innovation in the Digitized World , 2012, Organ. Sci..

[23]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Longitudinal Field Research Methods for Studying Processes of Organizational Change , 1990 .

[24]  J. Hultman Value Co-creation , 2009 .

[25]  Ola Henfridsson,et al.  Balancing platform control and external contribution in third‐party development: the boundary resources model , 2013, Inf. Syst. J..

[26]  A. Gawer,et al.  Towards a Theory of Ecosystems , 2018, Strategic Management Journal.

[27]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Exploiting and Defending Open Digital Platforms with Boundary Resources: Android's Five Platform Forks , 2018, Inf. Syst. Res..

[28]  Thomas R. Eisenmann,et al.  Platform Envelopment , 2010 .

[29]  Peng Huang,et al.  Co-Creation of Value in a Platform Ecosystem: The Case of Enterprise Software , 2011, MIS Q..

[30]  Robert Winter,et al.  Capabilities for Digital Platform Survival: Insights from a Business-to-Business Digital Platform , 2018, ICIS.

[31]  Carliss Y. Baldwin,et al.  The Architecture of Platforms: A Unified View , 2008 .

[32]  Ashley A. Bush,et al.  Platform Evolution: Coevolution of Platform Architecture, Governance, and Environmental Dynamics , 2010 .

[33]  Juan Santaló,et al.  Generativity Tension and Value Creation in Platform Ecosystems , 2019, Organization Science.

[34]  Lisen Selander,et al.  Capability search and redeem across digital ecosystems , 2013, J. Inf. Technol..

[35]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  The New Organizing Logic of Digital Innovation: An Agenda for Information Systems Research , 2011 .

[36]  A. Pettigrew WHAT IS A PROCESSUAL ANALYSIS. , 1997 .

[37]  Andrea Resca,et al.  A design theory for digital platforms supporting online communities: a multiple case study , 2015, J. Inf. Technol..

[38]  Svenja Falk,et al.  How to capture the B2B platform opportunity , 2020, Electron. Mark..

[39]  Jan Damsgaard,et al.  Towards an Integrated View of Multi-Sided Platforms Evolution , 2017, ICIS.

[40]  Armin Heinzl,et al.  Knowledge boundaries in enterprise software platform development: Antecedents and consequences for platform governance , 2019, Inf. Syst. J..