Computed tomography pulmonary angiography: an assessment of the radiology report.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to evaluate the uncertainty in computed tomographic pulmonary angiography (CTPA) radiology reports, manifested by descriptions of report limitations and image quality. MATERIALS AND METHODS CTPA reports between 2004 and 2006 were reviewed for patient demographic data (age, gender, pregnancy state), radiologist data (years of experience, subspecialty, final dictation by an attending radiologist vs a resident being present and dictating the report), the presence of pulmonary embolism (PE), and key words describing examination quality and limitations. RESULTS There were 2151 CTPA reports. Patterns of reporting CTPA in the impression sections of radiology reports were as follows: (1) PE conclusively positive (10%), (2) PE conclusively negative (29%), (3) PE negative to segmental arteries (27%), (4) PE negative to central pulmonary arteries (21%), (5) PE negative but suboptimal examination (8%), and (6) nondiagnostic examination (5%). Among the last three categories, seven PEs were not initially diagnosed but were found on subsequent imaging examinations. Limitations in image quality, respiratory motion artifact, and contrast enhancement were most frequently mentioned as limitations in image quality (62% and 28% of all reports, respectively). Radiologists tended to report limitations in image quality if they were thoracic radiology subspecialists, had >10 years of experience, or worked independently (P < .001). CONCLUSION Different patterns of reporting CTPA exist and vary on the basis of individual radiologists' subspecialties, experience, and whether they work independently or with residents. Certain wording regarding the presence of PE may falsely imply negativity of PE in a limited examination.

[1]  H. Yoon,et al.  Clinical outcomes of patients after a negative spiral CT pulmonary arteriogram in the evaluation of acute pulmonary embolism. , 1999, Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR.

[2]  C. Wittram.  How I do it: CT pulmonary angiography. , 2007, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[3]  V. Tapson,et al.  Acute pulmonary embolism. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  D. Ost,et al.  The negative predictive value of spiral computed tomography for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism in patients with nondiagnostic ventilation-perfusion scans. , 2001, The American journal of medicine.

[5]  P. Aspelin,et al.  Negative spiral CT in acute pulmonary embolism. , 2002, Acta radiologica.

[6]  J. Glassroth.  Imaging of pulmonary embolism: too much of a good thing? , 2007, JAMA.

[7]  V Latrabe,et al.  Pulmonary embolism revealed on helical CT angiography: comparison with ventilation-perfusion radionuclide lung scanning. , 2000, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[8]  M. Revel,et al.  Multidetector-row computed tomography in suspected pulmonary embolism. , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  H. Sostman,et al.  Imaging of pulmonary embolism. , 1986, Investigative radiology.

[10]  E. Coche,et al.  Diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism in outpatients: comparison of thin-collimation multi-detector row spiral CT and planar ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy. , 2003, Radiology.

[11]  Smita Patel,et al.  Pulmonary embolism: optimization of small pulmonary artery visualization at multi-detector row CT. , 2003, Radiology.

[12]  M. Prins,et al.  Single-Detector Helical Computed Tomography as the Primary Diagnostic Test in Suspected Pulmonary Embolism: A Multicenter Clinical Management Study of 510 Patients , 2003, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[13]  T. Egglin,et al.  Utilization Patterns and Diagnostic Yield of 3421 Consecutive Multidetector Row Computed Tomography Pulmonary Angiograms in a Busy Emergency Department , 2008, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[14]  Lisa Moores,et al.  Meta-Analysis: Outcomes in Patients with Suspected Pulmonary Embolism Managed with Computed Tomographic Pulmonary Angiography , 2004, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[15]  C. Krestan,et al.  Value of negative spiral CT angiography in patients with suspected acute PE: analysis of PE occurrence and outcome , 2004, European Radiology.

[16]  Y. Kaji,et al.  CT pulmonary angiography and CT venography: factors associated with vessel enhancement. , 2007, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[17]  J. Remy,et al.  CT angiography of pulmonary embolism in patients with underlying respiratory disease: impact of multislice CT on image quality and negative predictive value , 2002, European Radiology.

[18]  A. Donato,et al.  Clinical outcomes in patients with suspected acute pulmonary embolism and negative helical computed tomographic results in whom anticoagulation was withheld. , 2003, Archives of internal medicine.

[19]  H. Sostman,et al.  Diagnostic pathways in acute pulmonary embolism: recommendations of the PIOPED II Investigators. , 2007, Radiology.

[20]  K. Zou,et al.  Clinical validity of a negative computed tomography scan in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: a systematic review , 2005 .

[21]  Martine Remy-Jardin,et al.  Pulmonary embolus imaging with multislice CT. , 2003, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[22]  J. Remy,et al.  Clinical value of thin collimation in the diagnostic workup of pulmonary embolism. , 2000, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[23]  K. Zou,et al.  Clinical validity of a negative computed tomography scan in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: a systematic review. , 2005, JAMA.

[24]  Himanshu Shah,et al.  Suspected acute pulmonary embolism: evaluation with multi-detector row CT versus digital subtraction pulmonary arteriography. , 2004, Radiology.

[25]  Ramin Khorasani,et al.  Is terminology used effectively to convey diagnostic certainty in radiology reports? , 2003, Academic radiology.

[26]  W. Kapoor,et al.  Pulmonary embolism incidence is increasing with use of spiral computed tomography. , 2008, The American journal of medicine.

[27]  F. Laurent,et al.  Reproducibility of multi-detector spiral computed tomography in detection of sub-segmental acute pulmonary embolism , 2005, European Radiology.

[28]  A. Gottsäter,et al.  Clinically suspected pulmonary embolism: is it safe to withhold anticoagulation after a negative spiral CT? , 2001, European Radiology.

[29]  D. Slosman,et al.  Performance of Helical Computed Tomography in Unselected Outpatients with Suspected Pulmonary Embolism , 2001, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[30]  K. Garg,et al.  Clinical validity of helical CT being interpreted as negative for pulmonary embolism: implications for patient treatment. , 1999, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[31]  Daniel Hayoz,et al.  Diagnosing pulmonary embolism in outpatients with clinical assessment, D-dimer measurement, venous ultrasound, and helical computed tomography: a multicenter management study. , 2004 .

[32]  G. Kovacs,et al.  Computed tomographic pulmonary angiography vs ventilation-perfusion lung scanning in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: a randomized controlled trial. , 2007, JAMA.

[33]  Pamela K Woodard,et al.  Multidetector computed tomography for acute pulmonary embolism. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.

[34]  M. Horellou,et al.  A noninvasive diagnostic strategy including spiral computed tomography in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. , 2000, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[35]  J. Remy,et al.  Risk of pulmonary embolism after a negative spiral CT angiogram in patients with pulmonary disease: 1-year clinical follow-up study. , 2002, Radiology.

[36]  P. Grenier,et al.  Diagnostic strategy for patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: a prospective multicentre outcome study , 2002, The Lancet.

[37]  Martine Remy-Jardin,et al.  Management of suspected acute pulmonary embolism in the era of CT angiography: a statement from the Fleischner Society. , 2007, Radiology.