Frequency Analysis and Musical Ability

Soderquist (Psychonomic Science, 1970, 21,117–119) found that musicians were better than nonmusicians at separating out ("hearing out") partials from complex tones and proposed that this might be explained by the musicians having sharper auditory filters. In Experiment 1, the auditory filters of two groups, musicians and nonmusicians, were measured at three center frequencies by using a notched-noise masker. The filters were found not to differ in bandwidth between the two groups. However, the efficiency of the detection process after auditory filtering was significantly different between the two groups: the musicians were more efficient. In Experiment 2, the ability to hear out partials in a complex inharmonic tone was measured for the same two groups, using a tone produced by "stretching" the spacing between partials in a harmonic complex tone. Unfortunately, most of the nonmusicians were unable to perform this task. The ability of the musicians to hear out partials was not significantly correlated with the auditory filter bandwidths measured in Experiment 1. The musicians were also tested on the original harmonic complex tone (before "stretching"). For some partials, their performance was better for the inharmonic tone, reflecting the fact that the separation of the partials in frequency was greater for that tone. However, it was also found that those partials that were octaves of the fundamental in the harmonic series were identified better than corresponding partials in the inharmonic tone.

[1]  Reinier Plomp,et al.  Aspects of tone sensation , 1976 .

[2]  Brian C. J. Moore,et al.  Formulae describing frequency selectivity as a function of frequency and level, and their use in calculating excitation patterns , 1987, Hearing Research.

[3]  B. Moore An introduction to the psychology of hearing, 3rd ed. , 1989 .

[4]  R. Patterson Auditory filter shapes derived with noise stimuli. , 1976, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  David R. Soderquist Frequency analysis and the critical band , 1970 .

[6]  A. M. Mimpen,et al.  The ear as a frequency analyzer. II. , 1964, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  A. Bregman,et al.  Effects of the pattern of spectral spacing on the perceptual fusion of harmonics , 1990 .

[8]  B. Moore Frequency Selectivity in Hearing , 1987 .

[9]  R. Patterson Auditory filter shape. , 1974, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  A. Bachem,et al.  Tone height and tone chroma as two different pitch qualities. , 1950 .

[11]  C. Mason,et al.  Roving-level tone-in-noise detection. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  H. Levitt Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  Brian R Glasberg,et al.  Derivation of auditory filter shapes from notched-noise data , 1990, Hearing Research.

[14]  R. Patterson,et al.  The deterioration of hearing with age: frequency selectivity, the critical ratio, the audiogram, and speech threshold. , 1982, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  B C Moore Mechanisms of masking. , 1975, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  B. Moore,et al.  Suggested formulae for calculating auditory-filter bandwidths and excitation patterns. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  S. Locke,et al.  Categorical perception in a non-linguistic mode. , 1973, Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior.

[18]  B C Moore,et al.  Audibility of partials in inharmonic complex tones. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  B. Moore,et al.  Auditory filter shapes at low center frequencies. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.