Quality factors affecting iris segmentation and matching

Image degradations can affect the different processing steps of iris recognition systems. With several quality factors proposed for iris images, its specific effect in the segmentation accuracy is often obviated, with most of the efforts focused on its impact in the recognition accuracy. Accordingly, we evaluate the impact of 8 quality measures in the performance of iris segmentation. We use a database acquired with a close-up iris sensor and built-in quality checking process. Despite the latter, we report differences in behavior, with some measures clearly predicting the segmentation performance, while others giving inconclusive results. Recognition experiments with two matchers also show that segmentation and matching performance are not necessarily affected by the same factors. The resilience of one matcher to segmentation inaccuracies also suggest that segmentation errors due to low image quality are not necessarily revealed by the matcher, pointing out the importance of separate evaluation of the segmentation accuracy.

[1]  Jinyu Zuo,et al.  An Automatic Algorithm for Evaluating the Precision of Iris Segmentation , 2008, 2008 IEEE Second International Conference on Biometrics: Theory, Applications and Systems.

[2]  Tieniu Tan,et al.  Counterfeit iris detection based on texture analysis , 2008, 2008 19th International Conference on Pattern Recognition.

[3]  John Daugman,et al.  New Methods in Iris Recognition , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics).

[4]  David G. Lowe,et al.  Distinctive Image Features from Scale-Invariant Keypoints , 2004, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[5]  Libor Masek,et al.  MATLAB Source Code for a Biometric Identification System Based on Iris Patterns , 2003 .

[6]  Wayne J. Salamon,et al.  IREX II - IQCE :: iris quality calibration and evaluation : performance of iris image quality assessment algorithms , 2011 .

[7]  Tieniu Tan,et al.  Toward Accurate and Fast Iris Segmentation for Iris Biometrics , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[8]  Matthijs C. Dorst Distinctive Image Features from Scale-Invariant Keypoints , 2011 .

[9]  Javier Ortega-Garcia,et al.  Iris recognition based on SIFT features , 2004, 2009 First IEEE International Conference on Biometrics, Identity and Security (BIdS).

[10]  Patrick J. Flynn,et al.  Pupil dilation degrades iris biometric performance , 2009, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[11]  Patrick J. Flynn,et al.  Image understanding for iris biometrics: A survey , 2008, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[12]  Natalia A. Schmid,et al.  Estimating and Fusing Quality Factors for Iris Biometric Images , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans.

[13]  Tieniu Tan,et al.  Robust and Fast Assessment of Iris Image Quality , 2006, ICB.

[14]  Kang Ryoung Park,et al.  Real-Time Image Restoration for Iris Recognition Systems , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics).

[15]  Fernando Alonso-Fernandez,et al.  Iris boundaries segmentation using the generalized structure tensor. A study on the effects of image degradation , 2012, 2012 IEEE Fifth International Conference on Biometrics: Theory, Applications and Systems (BTAS).

[16]  Ashok A. Ghatol,et al.  Iris recognition: an emerging biometric technology , 2007 .

[17]  Julian Fiérrez,et al.  Quality Measures in Biometric Systems , 2012, IEEE Security & Privacy.

[18]  Xudong Jiang,et al.  Fingerprint quality and validity analysis , 2002, Proceedings. International Conference on Image Processing.

[19]  John Daugman,et al.  How iris recognition works , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology.

[20]  Kang Ryoung Park,et al.  A new iris segmentation method for non-ideal iris images , 2010, Image Vis. Comput..

[21]  Julian Fiérrez,et al.  Biosec baseline corpus: A multimodal biometric database , 2007, Pattern Recognit..