Gaia Data Release 2

The second Gaia data release (GDR2) provides precise five-parameter astrometric data (positions, proper motions and parallaxes) for an unprecedented amount of sources (more than $1.3$ billion, mostly stars). The use of this wealth of astrometric data comes with a specific challenge: how does one properly infer from these data the astrophysical parameters of interest? The main - but not only - focus of this paper is the issue of the estimation of distances from parallaxes, possibly combined with other information. We start with a critical review of the methods traditionally used to obtain distances from parallaxes and their shortcomings. Then we provide guidelines on how to use parallaxes more efficiently to estimate distances by using Bayesian methods. In particular also we show that negative parallaxes, or parallaxes with relatively larger uncertainties still contain valuable information. Finally, we provide examples that show more generally how to use astrometric data for parameter estimation, including the combination of proper motions and parallaxes and the handling of covariances in the uncertainties. The paper contains examples based on simulated Gaia data to illustrate the problems and the solutions proposed. Furthermore, the developments and methods proposed in the paper are linked to a set of tutorials included in the Gaia archive documentation that provide practical examples and a good starting point for the application of the recommendations to actual problems. In all cases the source code for the analysis methods is provided. Our main recommendation is to always treat the derivation of (astro-) physical parameters from astrometric data, in particular when parallaxes are involved, as an inference problem which should preferably be handled with a full Bayesian approach.

[1]  Coryn A. L. Bailer-Jones,et al.  A Probabilistic Approach to Fitting Period–luminosity Relations and Validating Gaia Parallaxes , 2016, 1611.07035.

[2]  L. Szabados,et al.  Gaia Data Release 1. Testing parallaxes with local Cepheids and RR Lyrae stars , 2017, 1705.00688.

[3]  Heinrich Eichhorn,et al.  On the estimation of distances from trigonometric parallaxes , 1996 .

[4]  Observatoire de la Côte d'Azur,et al.  Gaia Data Release 1. Summary of the astrometric, photometric, and survey properties , 2016, 1609.04172.

[5]  C. Barache,et al.  Gaia Data Release 1: Astrometry - one billion positions, two million proper motions and parallaxes , 2016, 1609.04303.

[6]  C. Barache,et al.  Gaia Data Release 1 - Catalogue validation , 2017, 1701.00292.

[7]  Ralph Schonrich,et al.  Assessing distances and consistency of kinematics in Gaia/TGAS , 2017, 1704.01333.

[8]  Jo Bovy,et al.  Stellar inventory of the solar neighbourhood using Gaia DR1 , 2017, 1704.05063.

[9]  Jean Kovalevsky,et al.  Astronomical Applications of Astrometry: The Hipparcos and Tycho Catalogues , 2008 .

[10]  Thomas E. Lutz,et al.  ON THE USE OF TRIGONOMETRIC PARALLAXES FOR THE CALIBRATION OF LUMINOSITY SYSTEMS: THEORY , 1973 .

[11]  L. Szabados,et al.  Gaia Data Release 1. Open cluster astrometry: performance, limitations, and future prospects , 2017, 1703.01131.

[12]  E. Masana,et al.  An updated maximum likelihood approach to open cluster distance determination , 2014, 1403.8022.

[13]  E. Slezak,et al.  Gaia Universe model snapshot - A statistical analysis of the expected contents of the Gaia catalogue , 2012, 1202.0132.

[14]  J. Bruijne,et al.  A Hipparcos study of the Hyades open cluster. Improved colour-absolute magnitude and Hertzsprung-Russell diagrams , 2000, astro-ph/0011565.

[15]  Dennis Stello,et al.  Evidence for Spatially Correlated Gaia Parallax Errors in the Kepler Field , 2017, 1706.09416.

[16]  J. J. González-Vidal,et al.  Gaia Data Release 2 , 2018, Astronomy & Astrophysics.

[17]  Coryn A. L. Bailer-Jones,et al.  ESTIMATING DISTANCES FROM PARALLAXES. II. PERFORMANCE OF BAYESIAN DISTANCE ESTIMATORS ON A GAIA-LIKE CATALOGUE , 2016, 1609.03424.

[18]  V. Belokurov,et al.  The first all-sky view of the Milky Way stellar halo with Gaia+2MASS RR Lyrae , 2017, 1707.03833.

[19]  C. Bailer-Jones,et al.  Estimating Distances from Parallaxes , 2015, 1507.02105.

[20]  Daniel Egret,et al.  Harmonizing Cosmic Distance Scales in a Post‐Hipparcos Era , 1999 .

[21]  Gunnar K. Malmquist A study of the stars of spectral type A , 1920 .

[22]  Lennart Lindegren,et al.  The astrometric core solution for the Gaia mission. Overview of models, algorithms, and software implementation , 2011, 1112.4139.

[23]  A. Eddington,et al.  On a Formula for Correcting Statistics for the Effects of a known Probable Error of Observation , 1913 .

[24]  M. A. C. Perryman,et al.  The Hipparcos and Tycho catalogues : astrometric and photometric star catalogues derived from the ESA Hipparcos Space Astrometry Mission , 1997 .

[25]  James Binney,et al.  The detection and treatment of distance errors in kinematic analyses of stars , 2011, 1111.0204.

[26]  L. Kaper,et al.  On the Hipparcos parallaxes of O stars , 2004, astro-ph/0408370.

[27]  Heidelberg,et al.  ESTIMATING DISTANCES FROM PARALLAXES. III. DISTANCES OF TWO MILLION STARS IN THE Gaia DR1 CATALOGUE , 2016, 1609.07369.

[28]  D. Hogg,et al.  Hierarchical Probabilistic Inference of the Color–Magnitude Diagram and Shrinkage of Stellar Distance Uncertainties , 2017, 1703.08112.

[29]  Boris Leistedt,et al.  Data-driven, Interpretable Photometric Redshifts Trained on Heterogeneous and Unrepresentative Data , 2016, 1612.00847.

[30]  J. Bovy,et al.  Red clump stars and Gaia: calibration of the standard candle using a hierarchical probabilistic model , 2017, 1705.08988.

[31]  C. Barache,et al.  Gaia Data Release 2 , 2018, Astronomy & Astrophysics.