Exploring the structural effects of Internetworking

Extant theory presents conflicting perspectives on how internetworking might affect the organizational structures of established firms. One prediction is that internetworking could narrow organizational scope and deepen specialization, reduce hierarchy, and increase external partnering. A second contends that internetworking might increase scope, expand hierarchy, and decrease external partnering. Analysis of a multinational sample of 469 firms reveals that deeply internetworked firms are more focused and specialized, less hierarchical, and more engaged in external partnering than less intensively internetworked organizations are. No scope broadening or hierarchy expansion effects are observed. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  Paul Milgrom,et al.  Bargaining and Influence Costs and the Organization of Economic Activity , 1987 .

[2]  Peter H. Grinyer,et al.  Strategy, Structure, Size and Bureaucracy , 1981 .

[3]  Peter J. Brews,et al.  Learning to plan and planning to learn: resolving the planning school/learning school debate , 1999 .

[4]  O. Williamson,et al.  STRATEGY RESEARCH: GOVERNANCE AND COMPETENCE PERSPECTIVES , 1999 .

[5]  Gregory S. Carpenter,et al.  Late Mover Advantage: How Innovative Late Entrants Outsell Pioneers: , 1998 .

[6]  Yolande E. Chan IT Value: The Great Divide Between Qualitative and Quantitative and Individual and Organizational Measures , 2000, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[7]  Paul Attewell,et al.  Computing and organizations: what we know and what we don't know , 1984, CACM.

[8]  E. P. Michael Strategy and the Internet. , 2001 .

[9]  Steven P. Schnaars Managing Imitation Strategies: How Later Entrants Seize Markets from Pioneers , 1994 .

[10]  G. Pisano The R&D Boundaries of the Firm: An Empirical Analysis , 1990 .

[11]  K ClemonsEric,et al.  Sustaining IT advantage , 1991 .

[12]  Dale A. Stirling,et al.  Information rules , 2003, SGMD.

[13]  J. Hagel,et al.  Unbundling the corporation. , 1999, Harvard business review.

[14]  Kar Yan Tam,et al.  The Impact of Information Technology Investments on Firm Performance and Evaluation: Evidence from Newly Industrialized Economies , 1998, Inf. Syst. Res..

[15]  D. B. Montgomery,et al.  First-mover (dis)advantages: Retrospective and link with the resource-based view , 1998 .

[16]  R. Coase The Nature of the Firm , 1937 .

[17]  JoAnne Yates,et al.  Electronic markets and electronic hierarchies , 1987, CACM.

[18]  M. Porter Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance , 1985 .

[19]  R. E. Miles,et al.  Organizing in the knowledge age: Anticipating the cellular form , 1997 .

[20]  R. E. Miles,et al.  Managing 21st century network organizations , 1992 .

[21]  M. Lindell,et al.  Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[22]  Marshall W. Meyer,et al.  Bureaucracy in Modern Society , 1971 .

[23]  Nirup M. Menon,et al.  Information Technology Value through Different Normative Lenses , 2000, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[24]  L. Guttman A basis for scaling qualitative data. , 1944 .

[25]  David F. Midgley,et al.  E-Business: Revolution, Evolution, or Hype? , 2001 .

[26]  Jeff Zabin,et al.  The Seven Steps to Nirvana: Strategic Insights into eBusiness Transformation , 2001 .

[27]  C. Parolini The Value Net: A Tool for Competitive Strategy , 1999 .

[28]  Wickham Skinner,et al.  The Productivity Paradox , 1986, The Productivity-Inclusiveness Nexus.

[29]  John N. Pearson,et al.  Planning and Financial Performance of Small, Mature Firms , 1986 .

[30]  Eric K. Clemons,et al.  The Impact of Information Technology on the Organization of Economic Activity: The "Move to the Middle" Hypothesis , 1993, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[31]  Peter J. Brews,et al.  Internetworking: Building Internet-generation companies , 2003 .

[32]  D. Pugh,et al.  Dimensions of Organization Structure , 1968 .

[33]  Andrew Whinston,et al.  Driving E-Business Excellence , 2001 .

[34]  C. R. Hinings,et al.  Values and Organizational Structure , 1996 .

[35]  Michael R. Vitale,et al.  The Growing Risks of Information Systems Success , 1986, MIS Q..

[36]  Suresh Kotha,et al.  Continuous “Morphing”: Competing Through Dynamic Capabilities, Form, and Function , 2001 .