Blind prediction of interfacial water positions in CAPRI

We report the first assessment of blind predictions of water positions at protein–protein interfaces, performed as part of the critical assessment of predicted interactions (CAPRI) community‐wide experiment. Groups submitting docking predictions for the complex of the DNase domain of colicin E2 and Im2 immunity protein (CAPRI Target 47), were invited to predict the positions of interfacial water molecules using the method of their choice. The predictions—20 groups submitted a total of 195 models—were assessed by measuring the recall fraction of water‐mediated protein contacts. Of the 176 high‐ or medium‐quality docking models—a very good docking performance per se—only 44% had a recall fraction above 0.3, and a mere 6% above 0.5. The actual water positions were in general predicted to an accuracy level no better than 1.5 Å, and even in good models about half of the contacts represented false positives. This notwithstanding, three hotspot interface water positions were quite well predicted, and so was one of the water positions that is believed to stabilize the loop that confers specificity in these complexes. Overall the best interface water predictions was achieved by groups that also produced high‐quality docking models, indicating that accurate modelling of the protein portion is a determinant factor. The use of established molecular mechanics force fields, coupled to sampling and optimization procedures also seemed to confer an advantage. Insights gained from this analysis should help improve the prediction of protein–water interactions and their role in stabilizing protein complexes. Proteins 2014; 82:620–632. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Kengo Kinoshita | Haruki Nakamura | Xiaoqin Zou | Julie C. Mitchell | Chaok Seok | Zhiping Weng | Dima Kozakov | Sandor Vajda | Solène Grosdidier | Albert Solernou | John Wieting | Thom Vreven | Martin Zacharias | Hahnbeom Park | Sanbo Qin | Matthieu Chavent | Hasup Lee | Chiara Pallara | Yuko Tsuchiya | Ezgi Karaca | Matsuyuki Shirota | Miriam Eisenstein | Howook Hwang | Junsu Ko | Pravin Muthu | Yoichi Murakami | Georgy Derevyanko | Eiji Kanamori | Colin Kleanthous | Idit Buch | H. Wolfson | Z. Weng | S. Wodak | S. Vajda | K. Kinoshita | J. Wieting | M. Eisenstein | I. Vakser | M. Zacharias | L. Perez-Cano | J. Fernández-Recio | P. Bates | Chaok Seok | Haruki Nakamura | B. Pierce | J. J. Gray | D. Kozakov | D. Ritchie | Huan‐Xiang Zhou | Sanbo Qin | M. Chavent | Hahnbeom Park | D. Standley | X. Zou | P. Kastritis | M. Lensink | Howook Hwang | A. Bonvin | T. Vreven | I. Moal | B. Jiménez-García | C. Kleanthous | Jianqing Xu | A. Melquiond | C. Schmitz | Yoichi Murakami | Idit Buch | E. Karaca | C. Pallara | Solène Grosdidier | P. Kundrotas | Eiji Kanamori | Y. Tsuchiya | M. Dijk | S. Grudinin | M. Shirota | Junsu Ko | Krishna Praneeth Kilambi | Hasup Lee | Jianqing Xu | Albert Solernou | Pravin Muthu | Georgy Derevyanko | Joy Sarmiento | Yang Shen | E. Farkash | Shengua Huang | J. Wojdyla | Shoshana J. Wodak | Petras J. Kundrotas | Ilya A. Vakser | Marc F. Lensink | Paul A. Bates | Daron M. Standley | Yang Shen | Christophe Schmitz | Marc Dijk | Huan‐Xiang Zhou | Alexandre M. J. J. Bonvin | Sergei Grudinin | Iain H. Moal | Panagiotis L. Kastritis | Adrien S. J. Melquiond | Brian Jiménez‐García | Laura Pérez‐Cano | Juan Fernández‐Recio | Krishna Praneeth Kilambi | Jeffrey J. Gray | Julie C. Mitchell | Joy Sarmiento | David W. Ritchie | Brian G. Pierce | Efrat Farkash | Haim J. Wolfson | Shen‐You Huang | Justyna A. Wojdyla | S. Grosdidier

[1]  A. Pommer,et al.  Specificity in protein-protein interactions: the structural basis for dual recognition in endonuclease colicin-immunity protein complexes. , 2000, Journal of molecular biology.

[2]  W. Kauzmann Some factors in the interpretation of protein denaturation. , 1959, Advances in protein chemistry.

[3]  Peter M. Kasson,et al.  GROMACS 4.5: a high-throughput and highly parallel open source molecular simulation toolkit , 2013, Bioinform..

[4]  David Baker,et al.  PROTEINS: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics 58:893–904 (2005) A “Solvated Rotamer ” Approach to Modeling Water- Mediated Hydrogen Bonds at Protein–Protein Interfaces , 2022 .

[5]  Bruce Tidor,et al.  Systematic placement of structural water molecules for improved scoring of protein-ligand interactions. , 2011, Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS.

[6]  M. Teeter,et al.  Water-protein interactions: theory and experiment. , 1991, Annual review of biophysics and biophysical chemistry.

[7]  Nicolas Moitessier,et al.  Docking Ligands into Flexible and Solvated Macromolecules. 6. Development and Application to the Docking of HDACs and other Zinc Metalloenzymes Inhibitors , 2014, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[8]  A. Sali,et al.  Modeller: generation and refinement of homology-based protein structure models. , 2003, Methods in enzymology.

[9]  Martin Smiesko,et al.  AcquaAlta: A Directional Approach to the Solvation of Ligand-Protein Complexes , 2011, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[10]  Carla Mattos,et al.  Protein-water interactions in a dynamic world. , 2002, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[11]  Rahman,et al.  Molecular-dynamics study of atomic motions in water. , 1985, Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

[12]  L. Serrano,et al.  Prediction of water and metal binding sites and their affinities by using the Fold-X force field. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  David W Ritchie,et al.  Recent progress and future directions in protein-protein docking. , 2008, Current protein & peptide science.

[14]  Stefano Forli,et al.  A force field with discrete displaceable waters and desolvation entropy for hydrated ligand docking. , 2012, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[15]  S. N. Timasheff,et al.  The control of protein stability and association by weak interactions with water: how do solvents affect these processes? , 1993, Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure.

[16]  Wei Li,et al.  Highly discriminating protein-protein interaction specificities in the context of a conserved binding energy hotspot. , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.

[17]  J. Janin,et al.  Wet and dry interfaces: the role of solvent in protein-protein and protein-DNA recognition. , 1999, Structure.

[18]  R. Wade,et al.  New hydrogen-bond potentials for use in determining energetically favorable binding sites on molecules of known structure. , 1989, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[19]  Dongping Zhong,et al.  Protein hydration dynamics and molecular mechanism of coupled water-protein fluctuations. , 2009, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[20]  Julie C. Mitchell,et al.  Community‐wide evaluation of methods for predicting the effect of mutations on protein–protein interactions , 2013, Proteins.

[21]  D. Goodsell,et al.  Automated docking to multiple target structures: Incorporation of protein mobility and structural water heterogeneity in AutoDock , 2002, Proteins.

[22]  A. Ben-Naim,et al.  Molecular recognition--viewed through the eyes of the solvent. , 2002, Biophysical chemistry.

[23]  Joël Janin,et al.  Protein-protein docking tested in blind predictions: the CAPRI experiment. , 2010, Molecular bioSystems.

[24]  Holger Gohlke,et al.  The Amber biomolecular simulation programs , 2005, J. Comput. Chem..

[25]  J. Onuchic,et al.  Water mediation in protein folding and molecular recognition. , 2006, Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure.

[26]  A. Fersht,et al.  Protein-protein recognition: crystal structural analysis of a barnase-barstar complex at 2.0-A resolution. , 1994, Biochemistry.

[27]  J. Janin,et al.  Protein‐protein recognition analyzed by docking simulation , 1991, Proteins.

[28]  B M Pettitt,et al.  Protein hydration density: theory, simulations and crystallography. , 1998, Current opinion in structural biology.

[29]  D. Baker,et al.  The structural and energetic basis for high selectivity in a high-affinity protein-protein interaction , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[30]  Alexandre M J J Bonvin,et al.  Solvated protein–protein docking using Kyte‐Doolittle‐based water preferences , 2013, Proteins.

[31]  J. Janin,et al.  Computer analysis of protein-protein interaction. , 1978, Journal of molecular biology.

[32]  S. Vajda,et al.  Scoring docked conformations generated by rigid‐body protein‐protein docking , 2000, Proteins.

[33]  Martin Zacharias,et al.  Accounting for conformational changes during protein-protein docking. , 2010, Current opinion in structural biology.

[34]  R C Wade,et al.  Further development of hydrogen bond functions for use in determining energetically favorable binding sites on molecules of known structure. 2. Ligand probe groups with the ability to form more than two hydrogen bonds. , 1993, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[35]  Chris de Graaf,et al.  Binding mode prediction of cytochrome p450 and thymidine kinase protein-ligand complexes by consideration of water and rescoring in automated docking. , 2005, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[36]  P. Kollman,et al.  Computational Studies of Enzyme-Catalyzed Reactions: Where Are We in Predicting Mechanisms and in Understanding the Nature of Enzyme Catalysis? , 2002 .

[37]  Richard D. Taylor,et al.  Modeling water molecules in protein-ligand docking using GOLD. , 2005, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[38]  Alexandre M. J. J. Bonvin,et al.  Solvated docking: introducing water into the modelling of biomolecular complexes , 2006, Bioinform..

[39]  M. Nakasako Water-protein interactions from high-resolution protein crystallography. , 2004, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[40]  R. Wade,et al.  Further development of hydrogen bond functions for use in determining energetically favorable binding sites on molecules of known structure. 1. Ligand probe groups with the ability to form two hydrogen bonds. , 1993, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[41]  D. Baker,et al.  Structure-guided forcefield optimization , 2011, Proteins.

[42]  Salvatore Cannistraro,et al.  Molecular Dynamics of Water at the Protein-Solvent Interface , 2002 .

[43]  S. Wodak,et al.  Docking and scoring protein complexes: CAPRI 3rd Edition , 2007, Proteins.

[44]  Kengo Kinoshita,et al.  Community-wide assessment of protein-interface modeling suggests improvements to design methodology. , 2011, Journal of molecular biology.

[45]  I. Kuntz,et al.  Hydration of proteins and polypeptides. , 1974, Advances in protein chemistry.

[46]  J Hermans,et al.  Hydrophilicity of cavities in proteins , 1996, Proteins.

[47]  Marc F Lensink,et al.  Docking and scoring protein interactions: CAPRI 2009 , 2010, Proteins.

[48]  Pascale Mentré Water in the orchestration of the cell machinery. Some misunderstandings: a short review , 2012, Journal of biological physics.

[49]  Gregory A Ross,et al.  Rapid and Accurate Prediction and Scoring of Water Molecules in Protein Binding Sites , 2012, PloS one.

[50]  Huynh-Hoa Bui,et al.  WATGEN: An algorithm for modeling water networks at protein–protein interfaces , 2007, J. Comput. Chem..

[51]  Jianpeng Ma,et al.  CHARMM: The biomolecular simulation program , 2009, J. Comput. Chem..

[52]  Matthew P. Repasky,et al.  Extra precision glide: docking and scoring incorporating a model of hydrophobic enclosure for protein-ligand complexes. , 2006, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[53]  Pinak Chakrabarti,et al.  Hydration of protein–protein interfaces , 2005, Proteins.

[54]  T. Darden,et al.  A smooth particle mesh Ewald method , 1995 .

[55]  R. Phillips,et al.  How does active site water affect enzymatic stereorecognition , 2002 .

[56]  Christopher R. Corbeil,et al.  Docking Ligands into Flexible and Solvated Macromolecules, 1. Development and Validation of FITTED 1.0 , 2007, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[57]  J. Janin,et al.  Structural basis of macromolecular recognition. , 2002, Advances in protein chemistry.

[58]  Jonathan G. Lees,et al.  Transient protein-protein interactions: structural, functional, and network properties. , 2010, Structure.

[59]  Justyna Aleksandra Wojdyla,et al.  Structure of the ultra-high-affinity colicin E2 DNase--Im2 complex. , 2012, Journal of molecular biology.

[60]  Lingle Wang,et al.  Ligand binding to protein-binding pockets with wet and dry regions , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[61]  Daniel Cappel,et al.  Probing the Dynamic Nature of Water Molecules and Their Influences on Ligand Binding in a Model Binding Site , 2011, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[62]  E. Katchalski‐Katzir,et al.  Molecular surface recognition: determination of geometric fit between proteins and their ligands by correlation techniques. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[63]  A. Warshel,et al.  What are the dielectric “constants” of proteins and how to validate electrostatic models? , 2001, Proteins.

[64]  Volkhard Helms,et al.  Adhesive water networks facilitate binding of protein interfaces. , 2011, Nature communications.

[65]  Robin Taylor,et al.  SuperStar: a knowledge-based approach for identifying interaction sites in proteins. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[66]  I. Vakser Protein docking for low-resolution structures. , 1995, Protein engineering.