Probabilistic genotyping software: An overview.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Niels Morling,et al. Estimating the probability of allelic drop-out of STR alleles in forensic genetics. , 2009, Forensic science international. Genetics.
[2] M W Perlin,et al. Linear mixture analysis: a mathematical approach to resolving mixed DNA samples. , 2001, Journal of forensic sciences.
[3] Bruce Budowle,et al. Strengthening forensic DNA decision making through a better understanding of the influence of cognitive bias. , 2017, Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society.
[4] M. Perlin,et al. Validating TrueAllele® DNA Mixture Interpretation * ,† , 2011, Journal of forensic sciences.
[5] SallyAnn Harbison,et al. Interpretation of DNA mixtures--Australian and New Zealand consensus on principles. , 2009, Forensic science international. Genetics.
[6] Simone Gittelson,et al. The paradigm shift in DNA profile interpretation. , 2017, Forensic Science International: Genetics.
[7] A Statistical Framework for the Interpretation of mtDNA Mixtures: Forensic and Medical Applications , 2011, PloS one.
[8] B Budowle,et al. Validation of short tandem repeats (STRs) for forensic usage: performance testing of fluorescent multiplex STR systems and analysis of authentic and simulated forensic samples. , 2001, Journal of forensic sciences.
[9] Duncan Taylor,et al. The interpretation of single source and mixed DNA profiles. , 2013, Forensic science international. Genetics.
[10] Simone Gittelson,et al. The Probabilistic Genotyping Software STRmix: Utility and Evidence for its Validity , 2018, Journal of forensic sciences.
[11] B. Weir,et al. Interpreting DNA mixtures. , 1997, Journal of forensic sciences.
[12] John Buckleton,et al. Is the 2p rule always conservative? , 2006, Forensic science international.
[13] Øyvind Bleka,et al. A comparative study of qualitative and quantitative models used to interpret complex STR DNA profiles. , 2016, Forensic science international. Genetics.
[14] Jo-Anne Bright,et al. Examination of the variability in mixed DNA profile parameters for the Identifiler multiplex. , 2010, Forensic science international. Genetics.
[15] H Haned,et al. Estimating drop-out probabilities in forensic DNA samples: a simulation approach to evaluate different models. , 2011, Forensic science international. Genetics.
[16] Duncan Taylor,et al. Developing allelic and stutter peak height models for a continuous method of DNA interpretation. , 2013, Forensic science international. Genetics.
[17] Duncan Taylor,et al. Developmental validation of STRmix™, expert software for the interpretation of forensic DNA profiles. , 2016, Forensic science international. Genetics.
[18] Mechthild Prinz,et al. Validation of a DNA mixture statistics tool incorporating allelic drop-out and drop-in. , 2012, Forensic science international. Genetics.
[19] Bruce Budowle,et al. Mixture Interpretation: Defining the Relevant Features for Guidelines for the Assessment of Mixed DNA Profiles in Forensic Casework * , 2009, Journal of forensic sciences.
[20] J Buckleton,et al. An investigation of the rigor of interpretation rules for STRs derived from less than 100 pg of DNA. , 2000, Forensic science international.
[21] Dirk Labudde,et al. GenoProof Mixture 3—New software and process to resolve complex DNA mixtures , 2017 .
[22] Angel Carracedo,et al. DNA mixtures in forensic casework: a 4-year retrospective study. , 2003, Forensic science international.
[23] Jo-Anne Bright,et al. Comparison of the performance of different models for the interpretation of low level mixed DNA profiles , 2014, Electrophoresis.
[24] K Slooten,et al. Contributors are a nuisance (parameter) for DNA mixture evidence evaluation. , 2018, Forensic science international. Genetics.
[25] W. Pflug,et al. The German Stain Commission: recommendations for the interpretation of mixed stains , 2008, International Journal of Legal Medicine.
[26] Peter Gill,et al. A comparison of stochastic variation in mixed and unmixed casework and synthetic samples. , 2012, Forensic science international. Genetics.
[27] Duncan Taylor,et al. Utilising allelic dropout probabilities estimated by logistic regression in casework. , 2014, Forensic science international. Genetics.
[28] W R Mayr,et al. DNA Commission of the International Society of Forensic Genetics (ISFG): an update of the recommendations on the use of Y-STRs in forensic analysis , 2006, International Journal of Legal Medicine.
[29] Øyvind Bleka,et al. Open source software EuroForMix can be used to analyse complex SNP mixtures. , 2017, Forensic science international. Genetics.
[30] Michael D. Coble,et al. Evaluation of forensic DNA mixture evidence: protocol for evaluation, interpretation, and statistical calculations using the combined probability of inclusion , 2016, BMC Genetics.
[31] Steffen L. Lauritzen,et al. A gamma model for {DNA} mixture analyses , 2007 .
[32] Norah Rudin,et al. Analysis of allelic drop-out using the Identifiler(®) and PowerPlex(®) 16 forensic STR typing systems. , 2014, Forensic science international. Genetics.
[33] Peter Gill,et al. National recommendations of the Technical UK DNA working group on mixture interpretation for the NDNAD and for court going purposes. , 2008, Forensic science international. Genetics.
[34] James Curran,et al. A discussion of the merits of random man not excluded and likelihood ratios. , 2008, Forensic science international. Genetics.
[35] Peter Gill,et al. Validation of probabilistic genotyping software for use in forensic DNA casework: Definitions and illustrations. , 2016, Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society.
[36] Peter Gill,et al. Genotyping and interpretation of STR-DNA: Low-template, mixtures and database matches-Twenty years of research and development. , 2015, Forensic science international. Genetics.
[37] P Gill,et al. DNA commission of the International Society of Forensic Genetics: Recommendations on the evaluation of STR typing results that may include drop-out and/or drop-in using probabilistic methods. , 2012, Forensic science international. Genetics.
[38] P A Barrio,et al. GHEP-ISFG collaborative exercise on mixture profiles (GHEP-MIX06). Reporting conclusions: Results and evaluation. , 2018, Forensic science international. Genetics.
[39] Bruce Budowle,et al. NIST interlaboratory studies involving DNA mixtures (MIX13): A modern analysis. , 2018, Forensic science international. Genetics.
[40] D. Balding,et al. Evaluating forensic DNA profiles using peak heights, allowing for multiple donors, allelic dropout and stutters. , 2013, Forensic science international. Genetics.
[41] Duncan Taylor,et al. Do low template DNA profiles have useful quantitative data? , 2015, Forensic science international. Genetics.
[42] J. A. Lindsey,et al. Validation and population studies of the loci LDLR, GYPA, HBGG, D7S8, and Gc (PM loci), and HLA-DQ alpha using a multiplex amplification and typing procedure. , 1995, Journal of forensic sciences.
[43] Y-profile evidence: Close paternal relatives and mixtures. , 2019, Forensic science international. Genetics.
[44] Jordan M. Eizenga,et al. A phylogenetic approach for haplotype analysis of sequence data from complex mitochondrial mixtures. , 2017, Forensic science international. Genetics.
[45] Duncan Taylor,et al. Investigating a common approach to DNA profile interpretation using probabilistic software. , 2015, Forensic science international. Genetics.
[46] E. Alladio,et al. DNA mixtures interpretation - A proof-of-concept multi-software comparison highlighting different probabilistic methods' performances on challenging samples. , 2018, Forensic science international. Genetics.
[47] Duncan Taylor,et al. Using probabilistic theory to develop interpretation guidelines for Y-STR profiles. , 2016, Forensic science international. Genetics.
[48] Duncan Taylor,et al. A series of recommended tests when validating probabilistic DNA profile interpretation software. , 2015, Forensic science international. Genetics.
[49] Bruce Budowle,et al. Evaluation of the Illumina(®) Beta Version ForenSeq™ DNA Signature Prep Kit for use in genetic profiling. , 2016, Forensic science international. Genetics.
[50] J Buckleton,et al. DNA Commission of the International Society for Forensic Genetics: Recommendations on the validation of software programs performing biostatistical calculations for forensic genetics applications. , 2016, Forensic science international. Genetics.
[51] Duncan Taylor,et al. Using continuous DNA interpretation methods to revisit likelihood ratio behaviour. , 2014, Forensic science international. Genetics.
[52] Jennifer D. Churchill,et al. Massively parallel sequencing-enabled mixture analysis of mitochondrial DNA samples , 2018, International Journal of Legal Medicine.
[53] Jo-Anne Bright,et al. A comparison of statistical models for the analysis of complex forensic DNA profiles. , 2014, Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society.
[54] Duncan Taylor,et al. Interpreting forensic DNA profiling evidence without specifying the number of contributors. , 2014, Forensic science international. Genetics.
[55] Peter M Vallone,et al. STR allele sequence variation: Current knowledge and future issues. , 2015, Forensic science international. Genetics.
[56] Niels Morling,et al. Allelic drop-out probabilities estimated by logistic regression--further considerations and practical implementation. , 2012, Forensic science international. Genetics.
[57] P Gill,et al. Euroforgen-NoE collaborative exercise on LRmix to demonstrate standardization of the interpretation of complex DNA profiles. , 2014, Forensic science international. Genetics.
[58] James Curran,et al. LoComatioN: a software tool for the analysis of low copy number DNA profiles. , 2007, Forensic science international.
[59] C. Børsting,et al. Sequencing of mitochondrial genomes using the Precision ID mtDNA Whole Genome Panel , 2018, Electrophoresis.
[60] Michael D. Coble,et al. Sequence-based analysis of stutter at STR loci: Characterization and utility , 2015 .
[61] Duncan A. Taylor,et al. Internal validation of STRmix™ - A multi laboratory response to PCAST. , 2018, Forensic science international. Genetics.
[62] Niels Morling,et al. Interpretation of DNA mixtures--European consensus on principles. , 2007, Forensic science international. Genetics.
[63] M. Holland,et al. Second generation sequencing allows for mtDNA mixture deconvolution and high resolution detection of heteroplasmy , 2011, Croatian medical journal.
[64] John M Butler,et al. NIST interlaboratory studies involving DNA mixtures (MIX05 and MIX13): Variation observed and lessons learned. , 2018, Forensic science international. Genetics.
[65] S. Greenspoon,et al. Establishing the Limits of TrueAllele® Casework: A Validation Study , 2015, Journal of forensic sciences.
[66] P. Gill,et al. PENDULUM--a guideline-based approach to the interpretation of STR mixtures. , 2005, Forensic science international.
[67] J Buckleton,et al. Interpreting simple STR mixtures using allele peak areas. , 1998, Forensic science international.
[68] John Buckleton,et al. Application of Random Match Probability Calculations to Mixed STR Profiles , 2013, Journal of forensic sciences.
[69] Jo-Anne Bright,et al. The variability in likelihood ratios due to different mechanisms. , 2015, Forensic science international. Genetics.
[70] Dieter Deforce,et al. My-Forensic-Loci-queries (MyFLq) framework for analysis of forensic STR data generated by massive parallel sequencing. , 2014, Forensic science international. Genetics.
[71] Jo-Anne Bright,et al. Internal validation of STRmix™ for the interpretation of single source and mixed DNA profiles. , 2017, Forensic science international. Genetics.
[72] J. Whitaker,et al. Analysis and interpretation of mixed forensic stains using DNA STR profiling. , 1998, Forensic science international.
[73] J A Lambert,et al. Taking account of peak areas when interpreting mixed DNA profiles. , 1998, Journal of forensic sciences.
[74] I W Evett,et al. A guide to interpreting single locus profiles of DNA mixtures in forensic cases. , 1991, Journal - Forensic Science Society.