A versatile technique for visual enhancement of medical ultrasound images

The paper presents a versatile wavelet domain despeckling technique to visually enhance the medical ultrasound (US) images for improving the clinical diagnosis. The method uses the two-sided generalized Nakagami distribution (GND) for modeling the speckle wavelet coefficients and the signal wavelet coefficients are approximated using the generalized Gaussian distribution (GGD). Combining these statistical priors with the Bayesian maximum a posteriori (MAP) criterion, the thresholding/shrinkage estimators are derived for processing the wavelet coefficients of detail subbands. Consequently, two blind speckle suppressors named as GNDThresh and GNDShrink have been implemented and evaluated on both the artificial speckle simulated images and real US images. The experimental results demonstrate the superiority of the suggested technique both quantitatively and qualitatively as compared to other competitive schemes reported in the image denoising literature, e.g., the proposed method yields a gain of more than 0.36 dB over the best state-of-the-art despeckling method (GenLik), 0.93 dB over SRAD filter, 2.35 dB over Lee filter, and 1.34 dB over Kuan filter in terms of signal-to-noise ratio, when tested on the realistic US images. The visual comparison of despeckled US images and the higher values of quality metrics (coefficient of correlation, edge preservation index, quality index, and structural similarity index) indicate that the new method suppresses the speckle noise well while preserving the texture and organ surfaces. Further, the proposed method will be evaluated on other class of images as well as by employing multiple observer evaluation.

[1]  E. W. Stacy,et al.  Parameter Estimation for a Generalized Gamma Distribution , 1965 .

[2]  P. Shankar Ultrasonic tissue characterization using a generalized Nakagami model , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[3]  Göran Salomonsson,et al.  Image enhancement based on a nonlinear multiscale method , 1997, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[4]  Andrew F. Laine,et al.  Speckle reduction and contrast enhancement of echocardiograms via multiscale nonlinear processing , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[5]  Anil K. Jain Fundamentals of Digital Image Processing , 2018, Control of Color Imaging Systems.

[6]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Statistical properties of radio-frequency and envelope-detected signals with applications to medical ultrasound. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[7]  Jong-Sen Lee,et al.  Speckle analysis and smoothing of synthetic aperture radar images , 1981 .

[8]  David L. Donoho,et al.  De-noising by soft-thresholding , 1995, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[9]  F. Kremkau,et al.  Artifacts in ultrasound imaging. , 1986, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[10]  Alexander A. Sawchuk,et al.  Adaptive Noise Smoothing Filter for Images with Signal-Dependent Noise , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[11]  Pierre Moulin,et al.  Analysis of Multiresolution Image Denoising Schemes Using Generalized Gaussian and Complexity Priors , 1999, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[12]  Christos P. Loizou,et al.  Quality evaluation of ultrasound imaging in the carotid artery based on normalization and speckle reduction filtering , 2006, Proceedings of the 12th IEEE Mediterranean Electrotechnical Conference (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37521).

[13]  P. Wells,et al.  Speckle in ultrasonic imaging , 1981 .

[14]  John W. Clark,et al.  Nonlinear multiscale wavelet diffusion for speckle suppression and edge enhancement in ultrasound images , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[15]  A. Tannenbaum,et al.  Despeckling of medical ultrasound images , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[16]  David L. Neuhoff,et al.  On the support of MSE-optimal, fixed-rate, scalar quantizers , 2001, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[17]  Martin Vetterli,et al.  Adaptive wavelet thresholding for image denoising and compression , 2000, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[18]  Stéphane Mallat,et al.  A Theory for Multiresolution Signal Decomposition: The Wavelet Representation , 1989, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[19]  Scott T. Acton,et al.  Speckle reducing anisotropic diffusion , 2002, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[20]  A. Bovik,et al.  A universal image quality index , 2002, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[21]  C.P. Loizou,et al.  Comparative evaluation of despeckle filtering in ultrasound imaging of the carotid artery , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[22]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[23]  S. Ghofrani,et al.  An adaptive speckle suppression filter based on Nakagami distribution , 2001, EUROCON'2001. International Conference on Trends in Communications. Technical Program, Proceedings (Cat. No.01EX439).

[24]  Dmitri Loguinov,et al.  Bayesian wavelet shrinkage with edge detection for SAR image despeckling , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[25]  S C Saxena,et al.  Homomorphic wavelet thresholding technique for denoising medical ultrasound images , 2005, Journal of medical engineering & technology.

[26]  B. Goldberg,et al.  Classification of ultrasonic B-mode images of breast masses using Nakagami distribution , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[27]  P M Shankar,et al.  A model for ultrasonic scattering from tissues based on the K distribution. , 1995, Physics in medicine and biology.

[28]  Jean-Marc Boucher,et al.  Multiscale MAP filtering of SAR images , 2001, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[29]  Alin Achim,et al.  Ultrasound image denoising via maximum a posteriori estimation of wavelet coefficients , 2001, 2001 Conference Proceedings of the 23rd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[30]  J.M. Reid,et al.  Use of non-Rayleigh statistics for the identification of tumors in ultrasonic B-scans of the breast , 1993, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[31]  Aleksandra Pizurica,et al.  A versatile wavelet domain noise filtration technique for medical imaging , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[32]  Goze B. Bénié,et al.  Analysis of speckle noise contribution on wavelet decomposition of SAR images , 1998, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[33]  S. Gupta,et al.  Wavelet-based statistical approach for speckle reduction in medical ultrasound images , 2003, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[34]  C. Burrus,et al.  Noise reduction using an undecimated discrete wavelet transform , 1996, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[35]  Yasser M. Kadah,et al.  Real-time speckle reduction and coherence enhancement in ultrasound imaging via nonlinear anisotropic diffusion , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[36]  Fawwaz T. Ulaby,et al.  Despeckling SAR images using a low-complexity wavelet denoising process , 2002, IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.