Selective killing of tumor neovasculature paradoxically improves chemotherapy delivery to tumors.

Antiangiogenic therapies are frequently used with concomitantly administered cancer chemotherapy to improve outcomes, but the mechanism for the benefit of the combination is uncertain. We describe a mechanism by which a specific, cytotoxic antivascular agent causes vascular remodeling and improved chemotherapy results. By selectively killing tumor neovasculature using short-ranged α-particles targeted to vascular endothelial (VE)-cadherin on vascular endothelial cells (by use of 225Ac-labeled E4G10 antibody) we were able both to reduce tumor growth and to increase the efficacy of chemotherapy, an effect seen only when the chemotherapy was administered several days after the vascular targeting agent, but not if the order of administration was reversed. Immunohistochemical and immunofluorescence studies showed that the vasculature of 225Ac-E4G10-treated tumors was substantially depleted; the remaining vessels appeared more mature morphologically and displayed increased pericyte density and coverage. Tumor uptake and microdistribution studies with radioactive and fluorescent small molecule drugs showed better accumulation and more homogenous distribution of the drugs within 225Ac-E4G10-treated tumors. These results show that 225Ac-E4G10 treatment leads to ablation and improvement of the tumor vascular architecture, and also show that the resulting vascular remodeling can increase tumor delivery of small molecules, thus providing a process for the improved outcomes observed after combining antivascular therapy and chemotherapy. This study directly shows evidence for what has long been a speculated mechanism for antiangiogenic therapies. Moreover, targeting the vessel for killing provides an alternative mode of improving chemotherapy delivery and efficacy, potentially avoiding some of the drawbacks of targeting a highly redundant angiogenic pathway.

[1]  D. Scheinberg,et al.  Bone marrow-derived endothelial progenitor cells are a major determinant of nascent tumor neovascularization. , 2007, Genes & development.

[2]  R K Jain,et al.  Time-dependent vascular regression and permeability changes in established human tumor xenografts induced by an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor/vascular permeability factor antibody. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  Kenneth P. Roos,et al.  Autocrine VEGF Signaling Is Required for Vascular Homeostasis , 2007, Cell.

[4]  W. Stallcup,et al.  Early Contribution of Pericytes to Angiogenic Sprouting and Tube Formation , 2004, Angiogenesis.

[5]  E. Perez,et al.  Paclitaxel plus bevacizumab versus paclitaxel alone for metastatic breast cancer. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[6]  S. Ametamey,et al.  Ionizing Radiation Antagonizes Tumor Hypoxia Induced by Antiangiogenic Treatment , 2006, Clinical Cancer Research.

[7]  E. Hattingen,et al.  Bevacizumab-induced diffusion restriction in patients with glioma: tumor progression or surrogate marker of hypoxia? , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[8]  Dai Fukumura,et al.  Tumor microenvironment abnormalities: Causes, consequences, and strategies to normalize , 2007, Journal of cellular biochemistry.

[9]  D. Goodhead Mechanisms for the biological effectiveness of high-LET radiations. , 1999, Journal of radiation research.

[10]  M. Westphal,et al.  Inhibition of Glioblastoma Angiogenesis and Invasion by Combined Treatments Directed Against Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-2, Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor, and Vascular Endothelial-Cadherin , 2005, Clinical Cancer Research.

[11]  R K Jain,et al.  Tumor angiogenesis and interstitial hypertension. , 1996, Cancer research.

[12]  R. Kerbel,et al.  Antiangiogenic strategies on defense: on the possibility of blocking rebounds by the tumor vasculature after chemotherapy. , 2007, Cancer research.

[13]  Rakesh K. Jain,et al.  Vascular Normalization by Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor 2 Blockade Induces a Pressure Gradient Across the Vasculature and Improves Drug Penetration in Tumors , 2004, Cancer Research.

[14]  D. Hicklin,et al.  Effect of p53 Status on Tumor Response to Antiangiogenic Therapy , 2002, Science.

[15]  Claudio Campa,et al.  Interaction between bevacizumab and murine VEGF-A: a reassessment. , 2008, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[16]  R. Jain,et al.  Vascular Morphogenesis and Remodeling in a Human Tumor Xenograft: Blood Vessel Formation and Growth After Ovariectomy and Tumor Implantation , 2001, Circulation research.

[17]  Gavin Thurston,et al.  Inhibition of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) signaling in cancer causes loss of endothelial fenestrations, regression of tumor vessels, and appearance of basement membrane ghosts. , 2004, The American journal of pathology.

[18]  M. Miura Detection of chromatin-bound PCNA in mammalian cells and its use to study DNA excision repair. , 1999, Journal of radiation research.

[19]  R. Kerbel,et al.  Rapid chemotherapy-induced acute endothelial progenitor cell mobilization: implications for antiangiogenic drugs as chemosensitizing agents. , 2008, Cancer cell.

[20]  E. Heath,et al.  Hypoxia-inducible factor-1 target genes as indicators of tumor vessel response to vascular endothelial growth factor inhibition. , 2008, Cancer research.

[21]  A. Harris,et al.  Carbonic anhydrase (CA IX) expression, a potential new intrinsic marker of hypoxia: correlations with tumor oxygen measurements and prognosis in locally advanced carcinoma of the cervix. , 2001, Cancer research.

[22]  Ricky T. Tong,et al.  Effect of vascular normalization by antiangiogenic therapy on interstitial hypertension, peritumor edema, and lymphatic metastasis: insights from a mathematical model. , 2007, Cancer research.

[23]  G. Yancopoulos,et al.  Angiopoietin-1/Tie-2 activation contributes to vascular survival and tumor growth during VEGF blockade. , 2009, International journal of oncology.

[24]  D. Scheinberg,et al.  Tumor Therapy with Targeted Atomic Nanogenerators , 2001, Science.

[25]  Gabriele Bergers,et al.  Modes of resistance to anti-angiogenic therapy , 2008, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[26]  V. Grégoire,et al.  Decrease in Tumor Cell Oxygen Consumption after Treatment with Vandetanib (ZACTIMA™; ZD6474) and its Effect on Response to Radiotherapy , 2009, Radiation research.

[27]  F. Liao,et al.  Identification of a transiently exposed VE-cadherin epitope that allows for specific targeting of an antibody to the tumor neovasculature. , 2005, Blood.

[28]  R. Jain Normalization of Tumor Vasculature: An Emerging Concept in Antiangiogenic Therapy , 2005, Science.

[29]  D. McDonald,et al.  Rapid vascular regrowth in tumors after reversal of VEGF inhibition. , 2006, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[30]  Masahiro Inoue,et al.  Antiangiogenic therapy elicits malignant progression of tumors to increased local invasion and distant metastasis. , 2009, Cancer cell.

[31]  R. Blasberg,et al.  Assessment of treatment response by autoradiography with (14)C-aminocyclopentane carboxylic acid, (67)Ga-DTPA, and (18)F-FDG in a herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase/ganciclovir brain tumor model. , 2003, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[32]  M Beth McCarville,et al.  Bevacizumab-Induced Transient Remodeling of the Vasculature in Neuroblastoma Xenografts Results in Improved Delivery and Efficacy of Systemically Administered Chemotherapy , 2007, Clinical Cancer Research.

[33]  M. Brechbiel Targeted α-therapy: past, present, future? , 2007 .