The Effects of Performance Monitoring on Emotional Labor and Well-Being in Call Centers

A study was conducted to investigate the relationship between performance monitoring and well-being. It also examined a mechanism, namely emotional labor, that might mediate the relationship between them, assessed the effect of the work context on the relationship between performance monitoring and well-being, and examined the relative effects of performance monitoring and work context on well-being. Three aspects of performance monitoring were covered, namely, its performance-related content (i.e., immediacy of feedback, clarity of performance criteria), its beneficial-purpose (i.e., developmental rather than punitive aims), and its perceived intensity. The participants were 347 customer service agents in two U.K. call centers who completed a battery of questionnaire scales. Regression analyses revealed that the performance-related content and the beneficial-purpose of monitoring were positively related to well-being, while perceived intensity had a strong negative association with well-being. Emotional labor did not mediate the relationship between monitoring and well-being in the form hypothesized, although it was related to these two factors. Work context (job control, problem solving demand, supervisory support) did not mediate the relationship between monitoring and well-being, but job control and supervisory support did moderate the relationship between perceived intensity and well-being. Relative to other study variables, perceived intensity showed stronger associations with emotional exhaustion, while job control and supervisory support tended to show stronger associations with depression and job satisfaction. Implications for theory, practice, and future research are discussed.

[1]  J. R. Aiello,et al.  Electronic performance monitoring and social context: impact on productivity and stress. , 1995, The Journal of applied psychology.

[2]  D. Rutter,et al.  Sources of occupational stress: An examination of British prison officers. , 1988 .

[3]  Robert I. Sutton,et al.  Maintaining Norms about Expressed Emotions: The Case of Bill Collectors , 1991 .

[4]  G. Alder.  Ethical Issues in Electronic Performance Monitoring: A Consideration of Deontological and Teleological Perspectives , 1998 .

[5]  Yang Shao,et al.  Electronic Performance Monitoring and Stress: The Role of Feedback and Goal Setting , 1993, Interacción.

[6]  P. Totterdell,et al.  Use and effectiveness of self-regulation strategies for improving mood in a group of trainee teachers. , 1999, Journal of occupational health psychology.

[7]  Paul R. Jackson,et al.  New measures of job control, cognitive demand, and production responsibility. , 1993 .

[8]  Cynthia D. Fisher,et al.  Mood and emotions while working: missing pieces of job satisfaction? , 2000 .

[9]  Alicia A. Grandey,et al.  Emotional labor and burnout: Comparing two perspectives of "people work" , 2002 .

[10]  J. Gross.  The Emerging Field of Emotion Regulation: An Integrative Review , 1998 .

[11]  J. Cook,et al.  Scales for the measurement of some work attitudes and aspects of psychological well‐being , 1979 .

[12]  Julius Kuhl,et al.  A Theory of Self-regulation: Action versus State Orientation, Self-discrimination, and Some Applications , 1992 .

[13]  Kerrie L. Unsworth,et al.  Shopfloor innovation: Facilitating the suggestion and implementation of ideas , 2000 .

[14]  S. Jenkins,et al.  Psychological health and involvement in interpersonally demanding occupations: A longitudinal perspective , 1994 .

[15]  S. Chaiken,et al.  The psychology of attitudes. , 1993 .

[16]  C. Carver,et al.  A control-process perspective on the origins of affect. , 1996 .

[17]  B. Parkinson.  Emotional stylists: Strategies of expressive management among trainee hairdressers , 1991 .

[18]  R. A. Grant,et al.  Computerized performance monitors: factors affecting acceptance , 1991 .

[19]  Pascale Carayon,et al.  Effect of Electronic Performance Monitoring on Job Design and Worker Stress: Review of the Literature and Conceptual Model , 1993 .

[20]  A. Bandura.  Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy.

[21]  J. R. Aiello,et al.  Computer Monitoring of Work Performance: Extending the Social Facilitation Framework to Electronic Presence1 , 1993 .

[22]  Alicia A. Grandey,et al.  Emotion regulation in the workplace: a new way to conceptualize emotional labor. , 2000, Journal of occupational health psychology.

[23]  Ron Henderson,et al.  Electronic Performance Monitoring: A Laboratory Investigation of the Influence of Monitoring and Difficulty on Task Performance, Mood State, and Self-Reported Stress Levels , 2000 .

[24]  S. Jackson,et al.  The Measurement of experienced burnout , 1981 .

[25]  Pascale Carayon,et al.  Effects of electronic performance monitoring on job design and worker stress: Results of two studies , 1994, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[26]  W. Zerbe.  Emotional dissonance and employee well-being. , 2000 .

[27]  Sue Fernie,et al.  (Not) Hanging on the Telephone: Payment Systems in the New Sweatshops , 1998 .

[28]  Brian Parkinson,et al.  Classifying Affect-regulation Strategies , 1999 .

[29]  R. H. Moorman,et al.  JUSTICE AS A MEDIATOR OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN METHODS OF MONITORING AND ORGANIZATIONAL CITIZENSHIP BEHAVIOR , 1993 .

[30]  Christopher A. Higgins,et al.  Computerized performance monitoring systems: use and abuse , 1986, CACM.

[31]  D. Rousseau.  Characteristics of Departments, Positions, and Individuals: Contexts for Attitudes and Behavior. , 1978 .

[32]  P Carayon,et al.  Employee stress and health complaints in jobs with and without electronic performance monitoring. , 1992, Applied ergonomics.

[33]  D. Nebeker,et al.  The Effects of Computer Monitoring, Standards, and Rewards on Work Performance, Job Satisfaction, and Stress1 , 1993 .

[34]  T. Kochan,et al.  COMPUTER-AIDED MONITORING: ITS INFLUENCE ON EMPLOYEE JOB SATISFACTION AND TURNOVER , 1989 .

[35]  Jeffrey M. Stanton,et al.  Reactions to Employee Performance Monitoring: Framework, Review, and Research Directions , 2000 .

[36]  H. Weiss,et al.  Affective Events Theory: A theoretical discussion of the structure, causes and consequences of affective experiences at work. , 1996 .

[37]  Cary L. Cooper,et al.  Job control and worker health , 1989 .

[38]  Peter Warr,et al.  The measurement of well-being and other aspects of mental health , 1990 .

[39]  Robert Karasek,et al.  Healthy Work : Stress, Productivity, and the Reconstruction of Working Life , 1990 .

[40]  J Lund,et al.  Electronic performance monitoring: A review of research issues. , 1992, Applied ergonomics.

[41]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[42]  P. Warr,et al.  The Psychology of Work : Theoretically Based Empirical Research , 2003 .

[43]  Dieter Zapf,et al.  Emotion Work as a Source of Stress: The Concept and Development of an Instrument , 1999 .

[44]  John Schaubroeck,et al.  Antecedents of workplace emotional labor dimensions and moderators of their effects on physical symptoms , 2000 .

[45]  Richard,et al.  Motivation through the Design of Work: Test of a Theory. , 1976 .

[46]  H. Weiss,et al.  An Examination of the Joint Effects of Affective Experiences and Job Beliefs on Job Satisfaction and Variations in Affective Experiences over Time. , 1999, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[47]  P. Carayon,et al.  Motivational, behavioral, and psychological implications of electronic monitoring of worker performance , 1986 .

[48]  Jeffrey M. Stanton,et al.  Effects of electronic performance monitoring on personal control, task satisfaction, and task performance , 1996 .