An analytical model for the prediction of the dynamic response of premixed flames stabilized on a heat-conducting perforated plate

Abstract The dynamic response of a premixed flame stabilized on a heat-conducting perforated plate depends critically on their coupled thermal interaction. The objective of this paper is to develop an analytical model to capture this coupling. The model predicts the mean flame base standoff distance; the flame base area, curvature and speed; and the burner plate temperature given the operating conditions; the mean velocity, temperature and equivalence ratio of the reactants; thermal conductivity and the perforation ratio of the burner. This coupled model is combined with our flame transfer function (FTF) model to predict the dynamic response of the flame to velocity perturbations. We show that modeling the thermal coupling between the flame and the burner, while accounting for the two-dimensionality of the former, is critical to predicting the dynamic response characteristics such as the overshoot in the gain curve (resonant condition) and the phase delay. Good agreement with the numerical and experimental results is demonstrated over a range of conditions.

[1]  ScienceDirect Proceedings of the Combustion Institute , 2000 .

[2]  S. Candel,et al.  Experimental analysis of nonlinear flame transfer functions for different flame geometries , 2009 .

[3]  A. Annaswamy,et al.  Response of a laminar premixed flame to flow oscillations: A kinematic model and thermoacoustic instability results , 1996 .

[4]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[5]  T. Poinsot,et al.  Sensitivity analysis of transfer functions of laminar flames , 2011 .

[6]  Ahmed F. Ghoniem,et al.  Mechanisms of stabilization and blowoff of a premixed flame downstream of a heat-conducting perforated plate , 2012 .

[7]  Ahmed F. Ghoniem,et al.  Impact of flame-wall interaction on premixed flame dynamics and transfer function characteristics , 2011 .

[8]  E. M. Bulewicz Combustion , 1964, Nature.

[9]  Reza Sharifi,et al.  Combustion Science and Technology , 2000 .

[10]  A. Gomez,et al.  Combustion and Flame , 2017 .

[11]  M. Manohar Thermo-acoustics of Bunsen type premixed flames , 2011 .

[12]  Ephraim M Sparrow,et al.  Heat transfer coefficients for the upstream face of a perforated plate positioned normal to an oncoming flow , 1982 .

[13]  D. Haworth,et al.  Combustion Theory and Modelling , 2013 .

[14]  R Rook,et al.  Response of burner-stabilized flat flames to acoustic perturbations , 2002 .

[15]  De Goey,et al.  Experimental and numerical investigation of the acoustic response of multi-slit Bunsen burners , 2009 .

[16]  G.,et al.  Combustion theory and modeling , 2008 .

[17]  J. M. Coulson,et al.  Heat Transfer , 2018, Finite Element Method for Solids and Structures.

[18]  Thierry Poinsot,et al.  A Study of the Laminar Flame Tip and Implications for Premixed Turbulent Combustion , 1992 .

[19]  Ahmed F. Ghoniem,et al.  Two-dimensional simulations of steady perforated-plate stabilized premixed flames , 2010 .

[20]  S. Candel,et al.  Nonlinear mode triggering in a multiple flame combustor , 2011 .

[21]  Yildiz Bayazitoglu,et al.  International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer , 2013 .

[22]  J. F. Clarke,et al.  A Numerical Study of Tunnel Fires , 1984 .

[23]  A. Annaswamy,et al.  Modeling the dynamic response of a laminar perforated-plate stabilized flame , 2009 .

[24]  Y. Matsui,et al.  An experimental study on the dynamic behavior of premixed laminar flames , 1982 .