Probabilistic environmental risk assessment of five nanomaterials (nano-TiO2, nano-Ag, nano-ZnO, CNT, and fullerenes)

Abstract The environmental risks of five engineered nanomaterials (nano-TiO2, nano-Ag, nano-ZnO, CNT, and fullerenes) were quantified in water, soils, and sediments using probabilistic Species Sensitivity Distributions (pSSDs) and probabilistic predicted environmental concentrations (PECs). For water and soil, enough ecotoxicological endpoints were found for a full risk characterization (between 17 and 73 data points per nanomaterial for water and between 4 and 20 for soil) whereas for sediments, the data availability was not sufficient. Predicted No Effect Concentrations (PNECs) were obtained from the pSSD and used to calculate risk characterization ratios (PEC/PNEC). For most materials and environmental compartments, exposure and effect concentrations were separated by several orders of magnitude. Nano-ZnO in freshwaters and nano-TiO2 in soils were the combinations where the risk characterization ratio was closest to one, meaning that these are compartment/ENM combinations to be studied in more depth with the highest priority. The probabilistic risk quantification allows us to consider the large variability of observed effects in different ecotoxicological studies and the uncertainty in modeled exposure concentrations. The risk characterization results presented in this work allows for a more focused investigation of environmental risks of nanomaterials by consideration of material/compartment combinations where the highest probability for effects with predicted environmental concentrations is likely.

[1]  R. Scholz,et al.  Modeled environmental concentrations of engineered nanomaterials (TiO(2), ZnO, Ag, CNT, Fullerenes) for different regions. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[2]  Mitsuhiro Murayama,et al.  Discovery and characterization of silver sulfide nanoparticles in final sewage sludge products. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[3]  Denise M Mitrano,et al.  Detecting nanoparticulate silver using single‐particle inductively coupled plasma–mass spectrometry , 2012, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[4]  Lorenz M. Hilty,et al.  Material Flow Modelling for Environmental Exposure Assessment - A Critical Review of Four Approaches Using the Comparative Implementation of an Idealized Example , 2013, EnviroInfo.

[5]  B. Nowack,et al.  Exposure modeling of engineered nanoparticles in the environment. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[6]  K. Hungerbühler,et al.  Comprehensive probabilistic modelling of environmental emissions of engineered nanomaterials. , 2014, Environmental pollution.

[7]  Sverker Molander,et al.  Particle Flow Analysis , 2012 .

[8]  H. Hwang,et al.  Determination of the mechanism of photoinduced toxicity of selected metal oxide nanoparticles (ZnO, CuO, Co3O4 and TiO2) to E. coli bacteria. , 2013, Journal of environmental sciences.

[9]  Elizabeth A. Casman,et al.  Modeling nanomaterial environmental fate in aquatic systems. , 2015, Environmental science & technology.

[10]  S. Diamond,et al.  Phototoxicity of TiO2 nanoparticles under solar radiation to two aquatic species: Daphnia magna and Japanese medaka , 2012, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[11]  M Boller,et al.  Synthetic TiO2 nanoparticle emission from exterior facades into the aquatic environment. , 2008, Environmental pollution.

[12]  Kyungho Choi,et al.  Non-monotonic concentration-response relationship of TiO(2) nanoparticles in freshwater cladocerans under environmentally relevant UV-A light. , 2014, Ecotoxicology and environmental safety.

[13]  Eva Oberdörster,et al.  Ecotoxicology of carbon-based engineered nanoparticles: Effects of fullerene (C60) on aquatic organisms , 2006 .

[14]  D. Barceló,et al.  First determination of C60 and C70 fullerenes and N-methylfulleropyrrolidine C60 on the suspended material of wastewater effluents by liquid chromatography hybrid quadrupole linear ion trap tandem mass spectrometry , 2010 .

[15]  Arnaud Magrez,et al.  Are carbon nanotube effects on green algae caused by shading and agglomeration? , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[16]  Robert I. MacCuspie,et al.  Identification and Avoidance of Potential Artifacts and Misinterpretations in Nanomaterial Ecotoxicity Measurements , 2014, Environmental science & technology.

[17]  Albert A Koelmans,et al.  Analysis of engineered nanomaterials in complex matrices (environment and biota): General considerations and conceptual case studies , 2012, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[18]  Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment , 2008 .

[19]  T. Hofmann,et al.  Release of TiO2 nanoparticles from sunscreens into surface waters: a one-year survey at the old Danube recreational Lake. , 2014, Environmental science & technology.

[20]  Stephen J Klaine,et al.  Toxicity of aqueous C70‐gallic acid suspension in Daphnia magna , 2012, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[21]  Fadri Gottschalk,et al.  A probabilistic method for species sensitivity distributions taking into account the inherent uncertainty and variability of effects to estimate environmental risk , 2013, Integrated environmental assessment and management.

[22]  Teresa F. Fernandes,et al.  Practical considerations for conducting ecotoxicity test methods with manufactured nanomaterials: what have we learnt so far? , 2012, Ecotoxicology.

[23]  Damià Barceló,et al.  Occurrence of aerosol-bound fullerenes in the Mediterranean Sea atmosphere. , 2012, Environmental science & technology.

[24]  Albert A Koelmans,et al.  Ecotoxicity test methods for engineered nanomaterials: Practical experiences and recommendations from the bench , 2012, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[25]  D. Lin,et al.  Toxicity of oxide nanoparticles to the green algae Chlorella sp. , 2011 .

[26]  Arturo A. Keller,et al.  Global life cycle releases of engineered nanomaterials , 2013, Journal of Nanoparticle Research.

[27]  Xiaoshan Zhu,et al.  Toxicity and bioaccumulation of TiO2 nanoparticle aggregates in Daphnia magna. , 2010, Chemosphere.

[28]  Harald F. Krug.  Nanosafety Research — Are We on the Right Track? , 2015 .

[29]  Carsten Schilde,et al.  Biological Surface Coating and Molting Inhibition as Mechanisms of TiO2 Nanoparticle Toxicity in Daphnia magna , 2011, PloS one.

[30]  C. Hirsch,et al.  C60 fullerene: a powerful antioxidant or a damaging agent? The importance of an in-depth material characterization prior to toxicity assays. , 2009, Environmental pollution.

[31]  Enda Cummins,et al.  Nano-Scale Pollutants: Fate in Irish Surface and Drinking Water Regulatory Systems , 2010 .

[32]  Vicki Stone,et al.  Review of fullerene toxicity and exposure--appraisal of a human health risk assessment, based on open literature. , 2010, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[33]  R. Schulz,et al.  Effects of nano-TiO(2) in combination with ambient UV-irradiation on a leaf shredding amphipod. , 2011, Chemosphere.

[34]  Laura Clément,et al.  Toxicity of TiO(2) nanoparticles to cladocerans, algae, rotifers and plants - effects of size and crystalline structure. , 2013, Chemosphere.

[35]  Christian Micheletti,et al.  Engineered nanoparticles: Review of health and environmental safety (ENRHES). Project Final Report , 2010 .

[36]  M. Xenopoulos,et al.  Toxicity of Silver and Titanium Dioxide Nanoparticle Suspensions to the Aquatic Invertebrate, Daphnia magna , 2013, Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology.

[37]  Konrad Hungerbühler,et al.  Development of environmental fate models for engineered nanoparticles--a case study of TiO2 nanoparticles in the Rhine River. , 2012, Environmental science & technology.

[38]  Dik van de Meent,et al.  Multimedia Modeling of Engineered Nanoparticles with SimpleBox4nano: Model Definition and Evaluation , 2014, Environmental science & technology.

[39]  Xiaoshan Zhu,et al.  Acute toxicities of six manufactured nanomaterial suspensions to Daphnia magna , 2009 .

[40]  Yoram Cohen,et al.  Multimedia environmental distribution of engineered nanomaterials. , 2014, Environmental science & technology.

[41]  Christian Micheletti,et al.  Analysis of currently available data for characterising the risk of engineered nanomaterials to the environment and human health--lessons learned from four case studies. , 2011, Environment international.

[42]  M. Mortimer,et al.  Toxicity of Ag, CuO and ZnO nanoparticles to selected environmentally relevant test organisms and mammalian cells in vitro: a critical review , 2013, Archives of Toxicology.

[43]  Lang Tran,et al.  Engineered nanomaterial risk. Lessons learnt from completed nanotoxicology studies: potential solutions to current and future challenges , 2013, Critical reviews in toxicology.

[44]  C. Tung,et al.  Inside Cover: Graphene‐Supported Ultrafine Metal Nanoparticles Encapsulated by Mesoporous Silica: Robust Catalysts for Oxidation and Reduction Reactions (Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1/2014) , 2014 .

[45]  Arturo A. Keller,et al.  Species sensitivity distributions for engineered nanomaterials. , 2015, Environmental science & technology.

[46]  F. Gottschalk,et al.  Engineered nanomaterials in water and soils: A risk quantification based on probabilistic exposure and effect modeling , 2013, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[47]  Dominic A Notter,et al.  Are nanosized or dissolved metals more toxic in the environment? A meta‐analysis , 2014, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[48]  Hyun-Chul Kim,et al.  Growth inhibition of aquatic plant caused by silver and titanium oxide nanoparticles , 2011, Toxicology and Environmental Health Sciences.

[49]  Fadri Gottschalk,et al.  Environmental concentrations of engineered nanomaterials: review of modeling and analytical studies. , 2013, Environmental pollution.

[50]  Sverker Molander,et al.  Facing complexity through informed simplifications: a research agenda for aquatic exposure assessment of nanoparticles. , 2013, Environmental science. Processes & impacts.

[51]  ANNE KAHRU,et al.  Mapping the dawn of nanoecotoxicological research. , 2013, Accounts of chemical research.

[52]  Jorge L Gardea-Torresdey,et al.  Evaluation of exposure concentrations used in assessing manufactured nanomaterial environmental hazards: are they relevant? , 2014, Environmental science & technology.