Towards a Global Names Architecture: The future of indexing scientific names

Abstract For more than 250 years, the taxonomic enterprise has remained almost unchanged. Certainly, the tools of the trade have improved: months-long journeys aboard sailing ships have been reduced to hours aboard jet airplanes; advanced technology allows humans to access environments that were once utterly inaccessible; GPS has replaced crude maps; digital hi-resolution imagery provides far more accurate renderings of organisms that even the best commissioned artists of a century ago; and primitive candle-lit microscopes have been replaced by an array of technologies ranging from scanning electron microscopy to DNA sequencing. But the basic paradigm remains the same. Perhaps the most revolutionary change of all – which we are still in the midst of, and which has not yet been fully realized – is the means by which taxonomists manage and communicate the information of their trade. The rapid evolution in recent decades of computer database management software, and of information dissemination via the Internet, have both dramatically improved the potential for streamlining the entire taxonomic process. Unfortunately, the potential still largely exceeds the reality. The vast majority of taxonomic information is either not yet digitized, or digitized in a form that does not allow direct and easy access. Moreover, the information that is easily accessed in digital form is not yet seamlessly interconnected. In an effort to bring reality closer to potential, a loose affiliation of major taxonomic resources, including GBIF, the Encyclopedia of Life, NBII, Catalog of Life, ITIS, IPNI, ICZN, Index Fungorum, and many others have been crafting a “Global Names Architecture” (GNA). The intention of the GNA is not to replace any of the existing taxonomic data initiatives, but rather to serve as a dynamic index to interconnect them in a way that streamlines the entire taxonomic enterprise: from gathering specimens in the field, to publication of new taxa and related data.

[1]  E. Michel,et al.  ZooBank: Reviewing the First Year and Preparing for the Next 250 , 2010 .

[2]  T. H. Bean.  Catalogue Of The Fishes Of New York , 1903 .

[3]  J. Wilkins.  Defining species : a sourcebook from antiquity to today , 2009 .

[4]  C. Mora,et al.  How Many Species Are There on Earth and in the Ocean? , 2011, PLoS biology.

[5]  A. Polaszek.  A universal register for animal names , 2005, Nature.

[6]  Brian D. Greene,et al.  Five new species of the damselfish genus Chromis (Perciformes: Labroidei: Pomacentridae) from deep coral reefs in the tropical western Pacific , 2008 .

[7]  G. Boxshall,et al.  New Species in the Old World: Europe as a Frontier in Biodiversity Exploration, a Test Bed for 21st Century Taxonomy , 2012, PloS one.

[8]  P. Kirk,et al.  International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants (Melbourne Code) , 2012 .

[9]  C. W. Stiles.  International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature , 1978, Nature.

[10]  Ellinor Michel,et al.  ZooBank: Developing a nomenclatural tool for unifying 250 years of biological information* , 2008 .

[11]  Jules-Sébastien-César Dumont d'Urville,et al.  Histoire Générale des Voyages , 2011 .

[12]  Anne E. Thessen,et al.  Data issues in the life sciences , 2011, ZooKeys.

[13]  Cene Fišer,et al.  Perspectives: Cryptic species diversity should not be trivialised , 2009 .

[14]  Sp Lapage,et al.  International Code of Nomenclature of Bacteria , 1992 .

[15]  Carl von Linné.  Systema Naturae: Per Regna Tria Naturae, Secundum Classes, Ordines, Genera, Species, Cum Characteribus, Differentiis, Synonymis, Locis, , 2011 .

[16]  J. O. Snyder.  Descriptions of new genera and species of fishes from Japan and the Riu Kiu Islands , 1909 .

[17]  Simon P. Wilson,et al.  Predicting total global species richness using rates of species description and estimates of taxonomic effort. , 2012, Systematic biology.

[18]  D. S. Jordan,et al.  Descriptions of new genera and species of fishes from the Hawaiian Islands , 1903 .

[19]  Richard L. Pyle,et al.  Taxonomer: a relational data model for managing information relevant to taxonomic research , 2004 .

[20]  D J Patterson,et al.  Names are key to the big new biology. , 2010, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[21]  G. L. Buffon,et al.  Histoire naturelle des poissons / par le Citoyen La Cepède. , 1803 .

[22]  P. Bryan Heidorn,et al.  Shedding Light on the Dark Data in the Long Tail of Science , 2008, Libr. Trends.

[23]  G. Cuvier,et al.  Le Regne Animal Distribue D'Apres Son Organisation, Pour Servir de Base A L'Histoire Naturelle Des Animaux Et D'Introduction A L'Anatomie Comparee , 2010 .

[24]  International Commission on Zoological Nomenclatur,et al.  Amendment of Articles 8, 9, 10, 21 and 78 of the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature to expand and refine methods of publication , 2012, ZooKeys.

[25]  Rudolf Meier,et al.  Species concepts and phylogenetic theory : a debate , 2000 .

[26]  Carl von Linné.  Species plantarum : exhibentes plantas rite cognitas, ad genera relatas, cum differentiis specificis, nominibus trivialibus, synonymis selectis, locis natalibus, secundum systema sexuale digestas , 2011 .