Comparing Student Attitudes to Different Models of the Same Virtual Patient

AIMS Two types of virtual patient designs can be distinguished - a 'narrative' structure and a 'problem-solving' structure (1). This study assesses attitudes of students with respect to learning communication skills via a virtual patient; and compares acceptability of the two different types of virtual patient designs. METHODS Two virtual patients were constructed around the same case, each emphasising a narrative or problem-solving model. Undergraduate medical students used the simulations as part of a communication skills program. A computer-based survey was used to assess attitude. RESULTS There was general acceptance of the use of the computer-based simulated patient. Students who generally performed better at communication skills, were more positive towards the virtual patient. There was no quantitative difference in acceptability between the two designs, but there were clear qualitative differences. CONCLUSIONS While students were moderately positive about both simulations, qualitative data indicated that their were clear differences in attitude between the two different designs.

[1]  M. Patton,et al.  Qualitative evaluation and research methods , 1992 .

[2]  Tessa Keegel,et al.  What's the Hype?: Interactive Patient Education for Adolescents , 1997 .

[3]  R. Hulsman,et al.  INTERACT-CANCER. The development and evaluation of a computer-assisted course on communication skills for medical specialists in oncology. , 1997, Patient education and counseling.

[4]  Gregor Kennedy,et al.  Using multimedia to assist students with communication skills and biopsychosocial integration: An evaluation , 2000 .

[5]  J. Henderson,et al.  Comprehensive, Technology-Based Clinical Education: The “Virtual Practicum” , 1998, International journal of psychiatry in medicine.

[6]  W. Hensel,et al.  Storytelling as a method for teaching values and attitudes , 1992, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[7]  M. Bearman,et al.  Random comparison of ‘virtual patient’ models in the context of teaching clinical communication skills , 2001, Medical education.

[8]  P Garrud,et al.  Non‐verbal communication: evaluation of a computer‐assisted learning package , 1993, Medical education.

[9]  D. Schoen Educating the reflective practitioner , 1987 .

[10]  C. Hall,et al.  Medical student response to an interactive patient simulation program used to supplement child abuse education. , 1996, Child abuse & neglect.

[11]  J. Myers,et al.  Using diagnostic reasoning (DxR) to teach and evaluate clinical reasoning skills , 1994, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[12]  Leon Goldman,et al.  Using Multimedia Virtual Patients to Enhance the Clinical Curriculum for Medical Students , 1998, MedInfo.