Personalized versus non-personalized computerized decision support system to increase therapeutic quality control of oral anticoagulant therapy: an alternating time series analysis

BackgroundThe quality control of oral anticoagulant therapy (OAT) during the initiation and maintenance treatment is generally poor. Physicians' ordering of OAT (especially fluindione and warfarin) can be improved by dose adjustment algorithms, taking into account the results of International Normalized Ratio (INR). Reminders at the point of care, computerized or not, have been demonstrated to be effective in changing physicians prescription behavior.However, few studies have addressed the benefit of personalized reminders versus non personalized reminders, whereas the personalized reminders require more development to access patient record data and integrate with the computerized physician order entry system.The Hospital Information System of George Pompidou European Hospital integrates an electronic medical record, lab test and drugs order entry system. This system allows to evaluate such reminders and to consider their implementation for routine use as well as the continuous evaluation of their impact on medical practice quality indicators.The objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of two types of reminders on overtreatment by oral anticoagulant: a simple reminder of text formatted dose adjustment table and a personalized recommendation for oral anticoagulant dose and next date of INR control, adapted to patient data. Both types of reminders appear to the physician at the moment of drug ordering.MethodsThe study is an alternating time series experiment with three 6 months periods, each one including every 2 months according to a Latin square scheme: a control period without any reminder, a period with the simple non personalized reminder, a period with personalized reminder. All patients hospitalized in departments using the computerized physician order entry system and ordered fluindione or warfarin, will be included in the study between November 2004 and May 2006.Main outcome will be the proportion of overcoagulation, as expressed by the proportion of observation time with INR over 4.5, assuming INR change linearly. Secondary outcome is the incidence of major haemorrhagic events. Data will be collected thanks to Hospital Information Systems databases.Data will be analyzed taking into account patient and physician clustering effect.

[1]  M. Leaning,et al.  Comparison of oral anticoagulant control by a nurse-practitioner using a computer decision-support system with that by clinicians. , 1997, Clinical and laboratory haematology.

[2]  A D Oxman,et al.  No magic bullets: a systematic review of 102 trials of interventions to improve professional practice. , 1995, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.

[3]  L. Wing,et al.  Comparison of an age adjusted warfarin loading protocol with empirical dosing and Fennerty's protocol. , 1999, Australian and New Zealand journal of medicine.

[4]  Bonnie Kaplan,et al.  Evaluating informatics applications - clinical decision support systems literature review , 2001, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[5]  F. Rosendaal,et al.  Assessment of Therapeutic Quality Control in a Long-Term Anticoagulant Trial in Post-Myocardial Infarction Patients , 1994, Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

[6]  Patrice Degoulet,et al.  An overview of the effect of computer-assisted management of anticoagulant therapy on the quality of anticoagulation , 1998, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[7]  Nick Freemantle,et al.  Computer support for determining drug dose: systematic review and meta-analysis , 1999, BMJ.

[8]  F R Rosendaal,et al.  A Method to Determine the Optimal Intensity of Oral Anticoagulant Therapy , 1993, Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

[9]  R. Beyth,et al.  Anticoagulant-related bleeding: clinical epidemiology, prediction, and prevention. , 1993, The American journal of medicine.

[10]  Joyce A. Mitchell,et al.  The clinical value of computerized information services. A review of 98 randomized clinical trials. , 1996, Archives of family medicine.

[11]  Heather L. Heiman,et al.  Contributions Acetaminophen and Other Risk Factors for Excessive Warfarin Anticoagulation , 2001 .

[12]  Leon Poller,et al.  European Concerted Action on Anticoagulation , 2002, Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

[13]  R. Haynes,et al.  Effects of computer-based clinical decision support systems on physician performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. , 1998, JAMA.

[14]  Jeremy M. Grimshaw,et al.  Changing Provider Behavior: An Overview of Systematic Reviews of Interventions , 2001, Medical care.

[15]  G. J. Kuperman Poller L, Shiach CR, MacCallum PK, Johansen AM, Munster AM, Magalhaes A, Jespersen J, Multicentre randomised study of computerised anticoagulant dosage. European Concerted Action on Anticoagulation , 1999, Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing.

[16]  I. Sanderson Getting Evidence into Practice , 2004 .

[17]  J M Grimshaw,et al.  Effect of clinical guidelines on medical practice: a systematic review of rigorous evaluations. , 1994, Lancet.

[18]  Bonnie Kaplan,et al.  Evaluating informatics applications - some alternative approaches: theory, social interactionism, and call for methodological pluralism , 2001, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[19]  P. Ravaud,et al.  A clinical decision support system for prevention of venous thromboembolism: effect on physician behavior. , 2000, JAMA.

[20]  R. Wolfinger,et al.  Generalized linear mixed models a pseudo-likelihood approach , 1993 .

[21]  J. Jespersen,et al.  Multicentre randomised study of computerised anticoagulant dosage , 1998, The Lancet.

[22]  P. Ravaud,et al.  Implementation of the Ottawa ankle rules in France. A multicenter randomized controlled trial. , 1997, JAMA.

[23]  J Jespersen,et al.  Multicentre randomised study of computerised anticoagulant dosage. European Concerted Action on Anticoagulation. , 1998, Lancet.

[24]  A. Ellrodt,et al.  Practice Guidelines and Reminders to Reduce Duration of Hospital Stay for Patients with Chest Pain: An Interventional Trial , 1994, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[25]  J. Emmerich Maladie thrombo-embolique veineuse , 2001 .

[26]  P. Ravaud,et al.  [Effectiveness of clinical guideline implementation strategies: systematic review of systematic reviews]. , 2000, Gastroenterologie clinique et biologique.