Contribution of the amygdala to learning and performance of conditional fear

The amygdaloid complex appears to be an essential component in the neural systems mediating some forms of aversive Pavlovian conditioning. The relative contribution of this structure to acquisition and performance during fear conditioning was assessed by making temporary lesions in the amygdala prior to training or retention testing in a single-trial Pavlovian conditioning preparation. Microinjection of lidocaine HCl (5.0%, 1.0 microliters) into the amygdala prior to the presentation of a CS signalling footshock resulted in a significant attenuation of the performance of conditional fear, as indexed by the amount of time rats spent engaged in defensive freezing behavior during the retention session. However, similar treatment with lidocaine prior to the training session, during which the CS and UCS were paired, resulted in only a weak reduction in subsequent responding. Thus, while both acquisition- and performance-related processes take place within the amygdala, it appears that the latter are more sensitive to disruption using the present procedures. These results are discussed in terms of the general role played by this structure in aversive learning and motivational processes.

[1]  Joseph E LeDoux,et al.  The lateral amygdaloid nucleus: sensory interface of the amygdala in fear conditioning , 1990, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[2]  M. Gallagher,et al.  Manipulation of opiate activity in the amygdala alters memory processes. , 1978, Life sciences.

[3]  R. D. Myers.  Handbook of drug and chemical stimulation of the brain : behavioral, pharmacological, and physiological aspects , 1974 .

[4]  Michael Davis,et al.  Anxiety and the Amygdala: Pharmacological and Anatomical Analysis of the Fear-Potentiated Startle Paradigm , 1988 .

[5]  Michela Gallagher,et al.  Amygdala central nucleus lesions: Effect on heart rate conditioning in the rabbit , 1979, Physiology & Behavior.

[6]  J. D. McGaugh,et al.  Stria terminalis lesions attenuate the effects of posttraining naloxone and beta-endorphin on retention. , 1986, Behavioral neuroscience.

[7]  H. Ursin,et al.  Exploration and avoidance in rats with lesions in amygdala and piriform cortex. , 1978, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[8]  N. White,et al.  Exploration evoked by electrical stimulation of the amygdala of rats , 1978 .

[9]  J. D. McGaugh,et al.  Memory enhancement with intra-amygdala post-training naloxone is blocked by concurrent administration of propranolol , 1989, Brain Research.

[10]  D. Blanchard,et al.  Innate and conditioned reactions to threat in rats with amygdaloid lesions. , 1972, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[11]  M. Mishkin,et al.  Further evidence that amygdala and hippocampus contribute equally to recognition memory , 1984, Neuropsychologia.

[12]  J. Ashe,et al.  Effects of basolateral amygdala lesions on neophobia, learned taste aversions, and sodium appetite in rats. , 1974, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[13]  Mortimer Mishkin,et al.  Chapter 12 – THE AMYGDALA: SENSORY GATEWAY TO THE EMOTIONS , 1986 .

[14]  M. Geyer,et al.  Behavior during hippocampal microinfusions. III. Lidocaine versus picrotoxin , 1982, Brain Research Reviews.

[15]  F. Helmstetter,et al.  The amygdala is essential for the expression of conditional hypoalgesia. , 1992, Behavioral neuroscience.

[16]  J L McGaugh,et al.  Time-Dependent Processes in Memory Storage , 1966, Science.

[17]  J. D. McGaugh,et al.  Amnesia produced by unilateral, subseizure, electrical stimulation of the amygdala in rats. , 1975, Behavioral biology.

[18]  D. Albert,et al.  An examination of the functionally effective spread of 4 μl of slowly infused lidocaine , 1980 .

[19]  M. Fanselow,et al.  Conditional analgesia, defensive freezing, and benzodiazepines. , 1988, Behavioral neuroscience.

[20]  N. Schneiderman,et al.  The role of amygdaloid central nucleus in the retention of differential pavlovian conditioning of bradycardia in rabbits , 1986, Behavioural Brain Research.

[21]  R. Kesner,et al.  The noradrenergic system of the amygdala and aversive information processing. , 1983, Behavioral neuroscience.

[22]  R. Rescorla,et al.  Two-process learning theory: Relationships between Pavlovian conditioning and instrumental learning. , 1967, Psychological review.

[23]  M. Fanselow,et al.  Effects of naltrexone on learning and performance of conditional fear-induced freezing and opioid analgesia , 1987, Physiology & Behavior.

[24]  G. V. Goddard.  AMYGDALOID STIMULATION AND LEARNING IN THE RAT. , 1964, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[25]  R. D. Myers,et al.  Injection of solutions into cerebral tissue: Relation between volume and diffusion , 1966 .

[26]  G. Paxinos.  The Rat nervous system , 1985 .

[27]  Michael Davis,et al.  Blocking of acquisition but not expression of conditioned fear-potentiated startle by NMDA antagonists in the amygdala , 1990, Nature.

[28]  R. Bolles,et al.  Conditioned fear assessed by freezing and by the suppression of three different baselines , 1980 .

[29]  G. Paxinos,et al.  The Rat Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates , 1983 .

[30]  Joseph E. LeDoux,et al.  Cardiovascular responses elicited by stimulation of neurons in the central amygdaloid nucleus in awake but not anesthetized rats resemble conditioned emotional responses , 1987, Brain Research.

[31]  Michael Davis,et al.  Fear-potentiated startle using an auditory conditioned stimulus: Effect of lesions of the amygdala , 1987, Physiology & Behavior.