Assessment of Technology Acceptance in Intensive Care Units

The process of deploy a technology in critical services need to be very careful planned and processed. As an example it is the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). In the ICU the patients are in critically ill conditions and there are not available time to make experiences or to develop incomplete systems. With the objective to improve the implementation process, the same should be accompanied in order to understand the environment and user behaviour. In this case and with the goal to evaluate the implementation process, an assessment model was applied to a real system called INTCare. INTCare is a Pervasive Intelligent Decision Support System (PIDSS). It was deployed in the ICU of Centro Hospitalar do Porto and was evaluated using the Technology Acceptance Model 3 (TAM). This assessment was made using the four constructs proposed by the TAM and a questionnaire-based approach guided by the Delphi Methodology. The results obtained so far show that although the users are satisfied with the offered information recognizing this importance, they demand for a faster system. This work present the main results achieved and suggest one way to follow when some technology is deployed in an environment like is ICU.

[1]  Filipe Portela,et al.  Intelligent Data Acquisition and Scoring System for Intensive Medicine , 2012, ITBAM.

[2]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research , 1977 .

[3]  Craig R Sellers,et al.  Intensive care unit cultures and end-of-life decision making. , 2007, Journal of critical care.

[4]  C. Sprung,et al.  Use of the SOFA score to assess the incidence of organ dysfunction/failure in intensive care units: results of a multicenter, prospective study. Working group on "sepsis-related problems" of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. , 1998, Critical care medicine.

[5]  J. le Gall,et al.  SAPS 3—From evaluation of the patient to evaluation of the intensive care unit. Part 1: Objectives, methods and cohort description , 2005, Intensive Care Medicine.

[6]  M Watson,et al.  Glasgow Coma Scale. , 1992, Professional nurse.

[7]  Filipe Portela,et al.  Data Mining Predictive Models for Pervasive Intelligent Decision Support in Intensive Care Medicine , 2012, KMIS.

[8]  S. Lemeshow,et al.  A new Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS II) based on a European/North American multicenter study. , 1993, JAMA.

[9]  Upkar Varshney Pervasive healthcare computing , 2009 .

[10]  Hyeoun-Ae Park Pervasive Healthcare Computing: EMR/EHR, Wireless and Health Monitoring , 2011, Healthcare Informatics Research.

[11]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a Research Agenda on Interventions , 2008, Decis. Sci..

[12]  Manuel Filipe Santos,et al.  INTCare - Multi-agent Approach for Real-time Intelligent Decision Support in Intensive Medicine , 2010, ICAART.

[13]  I. Hațieganu,et al.  PEARSON VERSUS SPEARMAN, KENDALL'S TAU CORRELATION ANALYSIS ON STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIPS OF BIOLOGIC ACTIVE COMPOUNDS , 2005 .

[14]  Nicola T. Shaw,et al.  The impact of a Critical Care Information System (CCIS) on time spent charting and in direct patient care by staff in the ICU: A review of the literature , 2009, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[15]  Chun Che Fung,et al.  TECTAM: An Approach to Study Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) in Gaining Knowledge on the Adoption and Use of E-Commerce/E-Business Technology among Small and Medium Enterprises in Thailand , 2010 .

[16]  Manuel Filipe Santos,et al.  INTCare: a Knowledge Discovery Based Intelligent Decision Support System for Intensive Care Medicine , 2005, J. Decis. Syst..

[17]  Filipe Portela,et al.  Intelligent decision support in Intensive Care : towards technology acceptance , 2012 .

[18]  J. Gardner-Thorpe,et al.  The value of Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS) in surgical in-patients: a prospective observational study. , 2006, Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England.

[19]  Filipe Portela,et al.  Enabling a Pervasive Approach for Intelligent Decision Support in Critical Health Care , 2011, CENTERIS.

[20]  Venkateshviswanath,et al.  A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model , 2000 .

[21]  Mauro Zackiewicz,et al.  Technological Foresight – Um instrumento para política científica e tecnológica , 2010 .

[22]  J. Machado,et al.  Intelligent and Real Time Data Acquisition and Evaluation to Determine Critical Events in Intensive Medicine , 2012 .

[23]  W. Schaufeli,et al.  Simplified Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System: the TISS-28 items--results from a multicenter study. , 1996 .

[24]  Filipe Portela,et al.  Knowledge Discovery for Pervasive and Real-time Intelligent Decision Support in Intensive Care Medicine , 2011, KMIS.

[25]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies , 2000, Management Science.