User satisfaction, community participation and quality of life among Chinese wheelchair users with spinal cord injury: a preliminary study.

The purpose of the present study was to investigate the relationships between spinal cord injury (SCI), wheelchair users' satisfaction, perceptions of their community participation and quality of life (QoL).Thirty-one community wheelchair users with SCI were administered the Chinese version of the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with assistive Technology (C-QUEST), the abbreviated Hong Kong version of the World Health Organization Quality of Life Questionnaire (WHO QoL-BREF (HK)) and selected items of 'Participation Restrictions' and 'Environmental Factors' of the International Classification of Functioning Disability and Health (ICF). Only a weak correlation was found between the C-QUEST services sub-scores and one ICF environmental factor, that is, health-related professionals (Spearman's r = 0.453; p < 0.05). The C-QUEST device sub-scores were also weakly correlated with four domain scores of the WHO QoL-BREF (HK) (Spearman's r = 0.412-0.567; p < 0.05). Social relationship, participation in leisure and driving activities had a moderate association with scores of the WHO QoL-BREF (HK) (-0.405 > Spearman's r > -0.583; p < 0.05). It is concluded that community participation (e.g. use of transportation) and human environment (e.g. friends and peers) were more related to QoL, than to users' satisfaction with a wheelchair. Further research with a larger sample is recommended to examine the variables related to SCI and QoL.

[1]  B. Kemp,et al.  Productivity after injury in a sample of spinal cord injured persons: a pilot study. , 1971, Journal of chronic diseases.

[2]  A. Chorus,et al.  Measuring participation according to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) , 2003, Disability and rehabilitation.

[3]  B. Üstün,et al.  The role of Environment in the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) , 2003, Disability and rehabilitation.

[4]  P. Kennedy,et al.  Correlates of stress in long-term spinal cord injury , 1999, Spinal Cord.

[5]  A. Jackson,et al.  Health status, community integration, and economic risk factors for mortality after spinal cord injury. , 2004, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[6]  C. Wolfson,et al.  Reliability, validity, and applicability of the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with assistive Technology (QUEST 2.0) for adults with multiple sclerosis , 2002, Disability and rehabilitation.

[7]  Marcel Dijkers,et al.  Environmental factors and their role in participation and life satisfaction after spinal cord injury. , 2004, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[8]  N. Z. Hampton,et al.  Dimensions of quality of life for Chinese adults with spinal cord injury: A qualitative study , 2004, Disability and rehabilitation.

[9]  Marcel Dijkers,et al.  Quality of life after spinal cord injury: a meta analysis of the effects of disablement components , 1997, Spinal Cord.

[10]  M J Scherer,et al.  Measuring subjective quality of life following spinal cord injury: a validation study of the assistive technology device predisposition assessment. , 2001, Disability and rehabilitation.

[11]  P. Corcoran,et al.  Independent living outcomes in spinal cord injury: multivariate analyses. , 1984, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[12]  Michael Curtin,et al.  Powered Wheelchairs and Tetraplegic Patients: Improving the Service , 1993 .

[13]  R. Wessels,et al.  Reliability and validity of the Dutch version of QUEST 2.0 with users of various types of assistive devices , 2003, Disability and rehabilitation.

[14]  R. W. Hanson,et al.  Variables associated with obtaining and sustaining employment among spinal cord injured males: A follow-up of 760 veterans , 1978 .

[15]  S. Garber,et al.  Wheelchair cushions for persons with spinal cord injury: an update. , 1991, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[16]  Rehabilitation outcomes following traumatic spinal cord injury in a tertiary spinal cord injury centre: a comparison with an international standard , 2005, Spinal Cord.

[17]  G. Whiteneck,et al.  Longitudinal outcomes in spinal cord injury: aging, secondary conditions, and well-being. , 1999, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[18]  D. Short,et al.  Mortality, morbidity, and psychosocial outcomes of persons spinal cord injured more than 20 years ago , 1992, Paraplegia.

[19]  M. Franceschini,et al.  Longitudinal outcome 6 years after spinal cord injury , 2003, Spinal Cord.

[20]  Stephen P Burns,et al.  Wheelchair configuration and postural alignment in persons with spinal cord injury. , 2003, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[21]  Yves Lepage,et al.  Health-related quality of life after spinal cord injury , 2002, Disability and rehabilitation.

[22]  A. Z. el Ghatit,et al.  Marriage and divorce after spinal cord injury. , 1976, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[23]  Hugh Stewart,et al.  Factors influencing the decision to abandon manual wheelchairs for three individuals with a spinal cord injury , 2002, Disability and rehabilitation.

[24]  M. Devivo,et al.  Predictors of life satisfaction: a spinal cord injury cohort study. , 2002, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[25]  C. Hsieh,et al.  A validity study of the WHOQOL-BREF assessment in persons with traumatic spinal cord injury. , 2004, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[26]  Long term prediction of self-reported problems following spinal cord injury , 1990, Paraplegia.

[27]  G. Whiteneck,et al.  Quantifying environmental factors: a measure of physical, attitudinal, service, productivity, and policy barriers. , 2004, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[28]  Peter Wing,et al.  Consortium for spinal cord medicine. , 2007, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[29]  B Phillips,et al.  Predictors of assistive technology abandonment. , 1993, Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA.

[30]  R A Keith,et al.  Patient satisfaction and rehabilitation services. , 1998, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[31]  Shirley G Fitzgerald,et al.  Assessing the influence of wheelchair technology on perception of participation in spinal cord injury. , 2004, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[32]  L. D. de Witte,et al.  Predictors of health status and life satisfaction in spinal cord injury. , 1998, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[33]  G. Whiteneck Outcome Evaluation and Spinal Cord Injury1 , 1992 .

[34]  G. Whiteneck,et al.  Quantifying handicap: a new measure of long-term rehabilitation outcomes. , 1992, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[35]  Sam C C Chan,et al.  The Validity and Applicability of the Chinese Version of the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction With Assistive Technology for People With Spinal Cord Injury , 2006, Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA.

[36]  D. Tate,et al.  Quality of life issues in individuals with spinal cord injury. , 2002, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[37]  M. Boninger,et al.  Driving characteristics of electric-powered wheelchair users: how far, fast, and often do people drive? , 2002, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[38]  R. W. Hanson,et al.  Outcome of marriages existing at the time of a male's spinal cord injury. , 1975, Journal of chronic diseases.