Performance modeling and analysis of spent nuclear fuel recycling

Summary The rapid expansion of nuclear energy in China has intensified concerns regarding spent fuel management. However, the consequences of failure or delay in developing approaches to managing spent fuel in China have not yet been explicitly analyzed. Thus, a dynamic analysis of transitions in nuclear fuel cycles in China to 2050 was conducted. This multi-disciplinary study compares the environmental, security, and economic consequences of choices among ongoing technology development options for spent fuel management. Four transition scenarios were identified: the direct disposal of PWR (Pressurized Water Reactor) spent fuel, the recycling of PWR spent fuel through PWR-MOX (Mixed Oxides), the PWR-MOX followed by fast reactors, and the recycling of PWR spent fuel using fast reactors. Direct disposal would have the lowest cost of electricity generation under the current market conditions, while the reprocessing and recycling of PWR spent fuel would benefit the Chinese nuclear power program by reducing the generation of high level waste (67–82%), saving natural U resources (9–17%), and reducing Pu management risk (24–58%). Moreover, a fast reactor system would provide better performance than one-time recycling through PWR-MOX. The latter also poses high risks in managing the build-up of separated Pu. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  Mathilde Estadieu,et al.  Recycling versus Long-Term Storage of Nuclear Fuel: Economic Factors , 2013 .

[2]  Won Il Ko,et al.  Modeling and system analysis of fuel cycles for nuclear power sustainability (I): Uranium consumption and waste generation , 2014 .

[3]  Zhu Yongjun Preliminary study on nuclear fuel cycle scenarios of China before 2020 , 2005 .

[4]  Jing Chen,et al.  Back-end of nuclear fuel cycle in China , 2012 .

[5]  Xu Mi,et al.  Fast reactor development strategy targets study in China , 2008 .

[6]  David von Hippel,et al.  Future regional nuclear fuel cycle cooperation in East Asia: Energy security costs and benefits , 2011 .

[7]  Bo Cao,et al.  Preliminary Study on Nuclear Fuel Cycle Scenarios of China before 2050 , 2013 .

[8]  Hyo Jik Lee,et al.  Dynamic analysis of once-through and closed fuel cycle economics using Monte Carlo simulation , 2014 .

[9]  Sungyeol Choi,et al.  Dynamic assessments on high-level waste and low- and intermediate-level waste generation from open and closed nuclear fuel cycles in Republic of Korea , 2014 .

[10]  Per Högselius,et al.  Spent nuclear fuel policies in historical perspective: An international comparison , 2009 .

[11]  Thomas W. Wood,et al.  Sustainability of light water reactor fuel cycles , 2014 .

[12]  Yun Zhou,et al.  Why is China going nuclear , 2010 .

[13]  Yun Zhou,et al.  China's spent nuclear fuel management: Current practices and future strategies , 2011 .

[14]  LU Dao-gang Primary analysis of PWR loaded with MOX fuel and related fuel cycle scenarios in China , 2013 .

[15]  Ju Wang,et al.  On area-specific underground research laboratory for geological disposal of high-level radioactive waste in China , 2014 .