Chapter 35. Pharmaceutical productivity — the imperative for new paradigms

Publisher Summary This chapter focuses on pharmaceutical productivity and explores new paradigms for it. Despite dramatic increases in R&D investment, the promise of the genomics revolution, and the remarkable array of new technical tools available to the discovery scientist, the record of industry productivity over the past decade as measured by drug approvals has declined. During this same period, the unpredicted rise of blockbusters and mega-blockbusters, a direct result of improved R&D/Marketing partnerships, has driven unprecedented revenue expansions, while the vigor of the generic industry has placed an exclamation point on sustainability. To maintain biopharmaceutical industry prospects for sustained growth and to meet the palpable healthcare needs of a global and aging population, increases in productivity on the order of 2 to 4-fold are required. The chapter focuses on the core issues of the biopharmaceutical industry, including new assemblies of technology, different organizational concepts best suited to the creation of a breakthrough in R&D productivity, etc. It also describes the concept of expanding the number of high confidence-in-rationale targets and discusses the central role of chemistry and chemical diversity based approaches.

[1]  B. Shoichet,et al.  A common mechanism underlying promiscuous inhibitors from virtual and high-throughput screening. , 2002, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[2]  Y. Martin Diverse viewpoints on computational aspects of molecular diversity. , 2001, Journal of combinatorial chemistry.

[3]  S. Schreiber PERSPECTIVE: THE SMALL-MOLECULE APPROACH TO BIOLOGYChemical genetics and diversity-oriented organic synthesis make possible the systematic exploration of biology , 2003 .

[4]  P Willett,et al.  Visual and computational analysis of structure--activity relationships in high-throughput screening data. , 2001, Current opinion in chemical biology.

[5]  H. Timmerman,et al.  Solid-phase synthesis of heterocyclic aromates: applicability towards combinatorial chemistry; a review. , 2003, Combinatorial chemistry & high throughput screening.

[6]  Glenn J. Myatt,et al.  LeadScope: Software for Exploring Large Sets of Screening Data , 2000, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[7]  E. Kerns,et al.  High throughput physicochemical profiling for drug discovery. , 2001, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[8]  Y. Martin,et al.  Do structurally similar molecules have similar biological activity? , 2002, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[9]  G. Dollinger,et al.  Simultaneous On-Line Characterization of Small Organic Molecules Derived from Combinatorial Libraries for Identity, Quantity, and Purity by Reversed-Phase HPLC with Chemiluminescent Nitrogen, UV, and Mass Spectrometric Detection , 1998 .

[10]  Lenz,et al.  Chemical ligands, genomics and drug discovery. , 2000, Drug discovery today.

[11]  J. Drews Biotechnology's metamorphosis into a drug discovery industry , 1998, Nature Biotechnology.

[12]  William P. Janzen,et al.  High Throughput Screening: Methods and Protocols , 2002 .

[13]  Philip M Dean,et al.  Probes for chemical genomics by design. , 2002, Drug discovery today.

[14]  Celia M. Henry,et al.  SYSTEMS BIOLOGY: Integrative approach in which scientists study pathways and networks will touch all areas of biology including drug discovery , 2003 .

[15]  Stuart L Schreiber,et al.  Diversity-oriented organic synthesis and proteomics. New frontiers for chemistry & biology. , 2002, Chemistry & biology.

[16]  Robert Schweitzer,et al.  Comparison of Assay Technologies for a Tyrosine Kinase Assay Generates Different Results in High Throughput Screening , 2002, Journal of biomolecular screening.