Incarcerated and Transmigrated Intrauterine Contraceptive Devices Managed at a Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital of East Delhi: A 5-Year Retrospective Analysis

[1]  Prashant V Sharma,et al.  Migrated intrauterine contraceptive device: erosion in to sigmoid colon , 2018 .

[2]  A. Nigam,et al.  Misplaced IUCD: a case report , 2017 .

[3]  Sonal Mishra,et al.  Copper T (380 A) and risk of uterine perforation in lactating women: rural scenario , 2017 .

[4]  S. Goyal,et al.  Displaced intrauterine device: A retrospective study , 2016, The Journal of Medical Research.

[5]  D. Horwell,et al.  Intrauterine devices and risk of uterine perforation: current perspectives , 2016, Open access journal of contraception.

[6]  S. Reed,et al.  Risk of uterine perforation with levonorgestrel-releasing and copper intrauterine devices in the European Active Surveillance Study on Intrauterine Devices. , 2015, Contraception.

[7]  D. Wildemeersch,et al.  Role of uterine forces in intrauterine device embedment, perforation, and expulsion , 2014, International journal of women's health.

[8]  P. Steyn,et al.  Intrauterine contraception after cesarean section and during lactation: a systematic review , 2013, International journal of women's health.

[9]  N. Goldstuck.  Assessment of uterine cavity size and shape: a systematic review addressing relevance to intrauterine procedures and events. , 2012, African journal of reproductive health.

[10]  C. Benson,et al.  Malpositioned Intrauterine Contraceptive Devices: Risk Factors, Outcomes, and Future Pregnancies , 2011, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[11]  ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 121: Long-acting reversible contraception: Implants and intrauterine devices. , 2011, Obstetrics and gynecology.