Building supertrees: an empirical assessment using the grass family (Poaceae).
暂无分享,去创建一个
Nicolas Salamin | Vincent Savolainen | V. Savolainen | N. Salamin | T. Hodkinson | Trevor R Hodkinson
[1] O. Bininda-Emonds,et al. Properties of matrix representation with parsimony analyses. , 1998, Systematic biology.
[2] K. Hilu,et al. Application of the matK gene sequences to grass systematics , 1996 .
[3] E. Kellogg. Relationships of cereal crops and other grasses. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[4] J. Bull,et al. An Empirical Test of Bootstrapping as a Method for Assessing Confidence in Phylogenetic Analysis , 1993 .
[5] E. Kellogg. Who's related to whom? Recent results from molecular systematic studies. , 1998, Current opinion in plant biology.
[6] H. Clifford,et al. The Classification of Poaceae: Subfamilies and Supertribes , 1985 .
[7] M. Pagel,et al. The comparative method in evolutionary biology , 1991 .
[8] K. Hilu,et al. Prolamin and immunological studies in the Poaceae. IV: Subfamily Panicoideae , 1993 .
[9] M. P. Cummings,et al. Slipped-strand mispairing in a plastid gene: rpoC2 in grasses (Poaceae). , 1994, Molecular biology and evolution.
[10] Andy Purvis,et al. Phylogenetic supertrees: Assembling the trees of life. , 1998, Trends in ecology & evolution.
[11] A. Purvis. A composite estimate of primate phylogeny. , 1995, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.
[12] F. Ronquist. Matrix representation of trees, redundancy, and weighting , 1996 .
[13] B. Gaut,et al. Patterns of genetic diversification within the Adh gene family in the grasses (Poaceae). , 1999, Molecular biology and evolution.
[14] J. Felsenstein. CONFIDENCE LIMITS ON PHYLOGENIES: AN APPROACH USING THE BOOTSTRAP , 1985, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[15] J. L. Gittleman,et al. Truth or Consequences: Effects of Phylogenetic Accuracy on Two Comparative Methods , 1994 .
[16] K. Hilu,et al. Electrophoretic and immunological studies of prolamins in the Poaceae. II, Phylogenetic affinities of the Aristideae , 1991 .
[17] M. Ragan. Phylogenetic inference based on matrix representation of trees. , 1992, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.
[18] J. L. Gittleman,et al. Building large trees by combining phylogenetic information: a complete phylogeny of the extant Carnivora (Mammalia) , 1999, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.
[19] M. Clegg,et al. A chloroplast DNA mutational hotspot and gene conversion in a noncoding region near rbcL in the grass family (Poaceae) , 1993, Current Genetics.
[20] A. Zharkikh,et al. Estimation of confidence in phylogeny: the complete-and-partial bootstrap technique. , 1995, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.
[21] H. Linder,et al. Haustorial synergids: an important character in the systematics of danthonioid grasses (Arundinoideae: Poaceae)? , 1994 .
[22] V. Hemleben,et al. Molecular phylogenetic relationships inAveneae (Poaceae) species and other grasses as inferred from ITS1 and ITS2 rDNA sequences , 1998, Plant Systematics and Evolution.
[23] B. Morton,et al. Molecular phylogenetics of Poaceae: an expanded analysis of rbcL sequence data. , 1996, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.
[24] K. Hilu,et al. The matK gene: sequence variation and application in plant systematics. , 1997, American journal of botany.
[25] Andy Purvis,et al. A Modification to Baum and Ragan's Method for Combining Phylogenetic Trees , 1995 .
[26] B. Hall,et al. Phylogenetic relationships among ascomycetes: evidence from an RNA polymerse II subunit. , 1999, Molecular biology and evolution.
[27] J. P. Gustafson,et al. Analysis of phylogenetic relationships in the Triticeae tribe using RFLPs , 1993, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.
[28] L. Watson,et al. On the Classification of the Chloridoideae (Poaceae) , 1997 .
[29] E. Kellogg,et al. Intraspecific and interspecific variation in 5S RNA genes are decoupled in diploid wheat relatives. , 1995, Genetics.
[30] A. Purvis,et al. Building phylogenies: are the big easy? , 1997, Trends in ecology & evolution.
[31] Jerrold I. Davis,et al. Phylogenetic structure in the grass family (Poaceae) as inferred from chloroplast DNA restriction site variation , 1993 .
[32] G. Petersen,et al. Phylogenetic analysis of the Triticeae (Poaceae) based on rpoA sequence data. , 1997, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.
[33] Arnold G. Kluge,et al. A Numerical Approach to Phylogenetic Systematics , 1970 .
[34] M. Pagel. Inferring the historical patterns of biological evolution , 1999, Nature.
[35] S. Warwick,et al. Phylogeny of North American Festuca (Poaceae) and related genera using chloroplast DNA restriction site variation , 1992 .
[36] M. Steel. The complexity of reconstructing trees from qualitative characters and subtrees , 1992 .
[37] V. Hemleben,et al. Distribution and complex organization of satellite DNA sequences in Aveneae species. , 1996, Genome.
[38] Jerrold I. Davis,et al. A phylogeny of the grass family (Poaceae), as inferred from eight character sets. , 2000 .
[39] K. H. Asay,et al. A Molecular Phylogeny of the Grass Family (Poaceae) Based on the Sequences of Nuclear Ribosomal DNA (ITS) , 1998 .
[40] H. Linder,et al. Sequences of the grass-specific insert in the chloroplast rpoC2 gene elucidate generic relationships of the Arundinoideae (Poaceae) , 1998 .
[41] K. Hilu,et al. Systematics of gramineae a cluster analysis study , 1982 .
[42] E. Kellogg,et al. Granule-bound starch synthase: structure, function, and phylogenetic utility. , 1998, Molecular biology and evolution.
[43] B. Baum. A phylogenetic analysis of the tribe Triticeae (Poaceae) based on morphological characters of the genera , 1983 .
[44] A. Purvis,et al. Are big trees indeed easy? Reply from A. Purvis and D.L.J. Quicke. , 1997, Trends in ecology & evolution.
[45] E. Buckler,et al. Zea systematics: ribosomal ITS evidence. , 1996, Molecular biology and evolution.
[46] D. Soltis,et al. Inferring complex phylogenies using parsimony: an empirical approach using three large DNA data sets for angiosperms. , 1998, Systematic biology.
[47] M Steel,et al. Simple but fundamental limitations on supertree and consensus tree methods. , 2000, Systematic biology.
[48] M J Sanderson,et al. Improved bootstrap confidence limits in large-scale phylogenies, with an example from Neo-Astragalus (Leguminosae). , 2000, Systematic biology.
[49] K. H. Asay,et al. Phylogenetic relationships of the monogenomic species of the wheat tribe, Triticeae (Poaceae), inferred from nuclear rDNA (internal transcribed spacer) sequences. , 1995, Genome.
[50] Hidetoshi Shimodaira,et al. Multiple Comparisons of Log-Likelihoods with Applications to Phylogenetic Inference , 1999, Molecular Biology and Evolution.
[51] L. Watson,et al. THE CLASSIFICATION OF POACEAE SUBFAMILY POOIDEAE , 1982 .
[52] K. Hilu,et al. Phylogeny of Poaceae Inferred from matK Sequences , 1999 .
[53] N. Goldman,et al. Are big trees indeed easy? , 1997, Trends in ecology & evolution.
[54] W. Kress,et al. Angiosperm phylogeny inferred from 18S rDNA, rbcL, and atpB sequences , 2000 .
[55] E. Kellogg,et al. Testing for Phylogenetic Conflict Among Molecular Data Sets in the Tribe Triticeae (Gramineae) , 1996 .
[56] S. Mathews,et al. The phytochrome gene family in grasses (Poaceae): a phylogeny and evidence that grasses have a subset of the loci found in dicot angiosperms. , 1996, Molecular biology and evolution.
[57] P. Peterson,et al. Phylogeny of North American oryzoid grasses as construed from maps of plastid DNA restriction sites , 1993 .
[58] K. H. Asay,et al. Molecular phylogeny of the Pooideae (Poaceae) based on nuclear rDNA (ITS) sequences , 1995, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.
[59] B. Baum. Combining trees as a way of combining data sets for phylogenetic inference, and the desirability of combining gene trees , 1992 .
[60] K. H. Asay,et al. Phylogenetic relationships of 10 grass species: an assessment of phylogenetic utility of the internal transcribed spacer region in nuclear ribosomal DNA in monocots. , 1994, Genome.
[61] D. Soltis,et al. Phylogenetics of flowering plants based on combined analysis of plastid atpB and rbcL gene sequences. , 2000, Systematic biology.
[62] M. Clegg,et al. EVOLUTIONARY ANALYSIS OF THE LARGE SUBUNIT OF CARBOXYLASE (rbcL) NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE AMONG THE GRASSES (GRAMINEAE) , 1990, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[63] D. Hillis. Inferring complex phytogenies , 1996, Nature.
[64] K. Bremer. THE LIMITS OF AMINO ACID SEQUENCE DATA IN ANGIOSPERM PHYLOGENETIC RECONSTRUCTION , 1988, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[65] S. Nadot,et al. A phylogenetic analysis of monocotyledons based on the chloroplast gene rps4, using parsimony and a new numerical phenetics method. , 1995, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.
[66] B. Baum,et al. ASSESSMENT OF THE GENOMIC SYSTEM OF CLASSIFICATION IN THE TRITICEAE , 1987 .
[67] S. Nadot,et al. The chloroplast generps 4 as a tool for the study ofPoaceae phylogeny , 1994, Plant Systematics and Evolution.
[68] J. Wendel,et al. A Phylogeny of the Grass Family (Poaceae) Based on ndhF Sequence Data , 1995 .
[69] W. Zhang,et al. Phylogeny of the grass family (Poaceae) from rpl16 intron sequence data. , 2000, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.
[70] N. Barker. The relationships of Amphipogon, Elytrophorus and Cyperochloa (Poaceae) as suggested by rbcL sequence data , 1997 .
[71] R. Sokal,et al. A METHOD FOR DEDUCING BRANCHING SEQUENCES IN PHYLOGENY , 1965 .
[72] E. Kellogg. TOOLS FOR STUDYING THE CHLOROPLAST GENOME IN THE TRITICEAE (GRAMINEAE): AN ECORI MAP, A DIAGNOSTIC DELETION, AND SUPPORT FOR BROMUS AS AN OUTGROUP , 1992 .
[73] D. Robinson,et al. Comparison of phylogenetic trees , 1981 .
[74] E. Harley,et al. Polyphyly of Arundinoideae (Poaceae): Evidence from rbcL Sequence Data , 1995 .
[75] R. Olmstead,et al. Phylogeny of Poaceae subfamily Pooideae based on chloroplast ndhF gene sequences. , 1997, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.
[76] M. Ragan,et al. Reply to A. G. Rodrigo's "A Comment on Baum's Method for Combining Phylogenetic Trees" , 1993 .
[77] A. Rodrigo,et al. Likelihood-based tests of topologies in phylogenetics. , 2000, Systematic biology.
[78] E. Zimmer,et al. Ribosomal RNA sequences for inferring phylogeny within the grass family (Poaceae) , 1988, Plant Systematics and Evolution.
[79] A. Rodrigo,et al. Calibrating the bootstrap test of monophyly. , 1993, International journal for parasitology.
[80] Leigh A. Johnson,et al. Assessing Congruence: Empirical Examples from Molecular Data , 1998 .
[81] N. J. Chatterton,et al. A molecular phylogeny of the subfamily Arundinoideae (Poaceae) based on sequences of rDNA , 1995 .
[82] J. Doyle,et al. A phylogenetic analysis of chloroplast DNA restriction site variation inPoaceae subfam.Pooideae , 1990, Plant Systematics and Evolution.
[83] E. Kellogg. Comments on genomic genera in the Triticeae (Poaceae) , 1989 .
[84] Junhyong Kim,et al. GENERAL INCONSISTENCY CONDITIONS FOR MAXIMUM PARSIMONY: EFFECTS OF BRANCH LENGTHS AND INCREASING NUMBERS OF TAXA , 1996 .