The Influence of Language-specific Auditory Cues on the Learnability of Center-embedded Recursion

The learnability of center-embedded recursive structures has attracted much attention (Corballis, 2007; Friederici, 2004; Rey, Perruchet, & Fagot, 2012). However, most of the previous studies adopted the artificial grammar learning paradigm (Reber, 1967) and did not apply natural language stimuli. Rather, they applied synthetic meaningless training materials, which hardly represent the richness and complexity of natural language. Accordingly, in the current study, we attempt to tighten the link between artificial language learning and natural language acquisition in the auditory modality, by enriching our learning environment with phonological cues that occur in natural, spoken information; in particular, Chinese tones. In a grammaticality judgment task, we examined the syntactical processing by participants from different language backgrounds. Through the cross-language comparison between Chinese and Dutch native speakers, we aim to test the influence of language-specific phonological cues on processing complex linguistic structures. The results showed that tones had a more beneficial learning effect for Chinese than for Dutch participants. In other words, when participants learned a new language, they were likely to bring their own language routines implicitly from the familiar native language into processing the unfamiliar one.

[1]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  The faculty of language: what is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? , 2002, Science.

[2]  Jun Lai,et al.  How “small” is “starting small” for learning hierarchical centre-embedded structures? , 2013 .

[3]  Jenny R. Saffran,et al.  Statistical learning of a tonal language: the influence of bilingualism and previous linguistic experience , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[4]  Jutta L. Mueller,et al.  Learnability of Embedded Syntactic Structures Depends on Prosodic Cues , 2010, Cogn. Sci..

[5]  William D. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Crossed and nested dependencies in German and Dutch , 1986 .

[6]  R. Gómez,et al.  The Developmental Trajectory of Nonadjacent Dependency Learning. , 2005, Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies.

[7]  M. Adenzato,et al.  Is recursion language-specific? Evidence of recursive mechanisms in the structure of intentional action , 2014, Consciousness and Cognition.

[8]  Luca Onnis,et al.  Language experience changes subsequent learning , 2013, Cognition.

[9]  Karl Magnus Petersson,et al.  Modality transfer of acquired structural regularities: A preference for an acoustic route , 2009 .

[10]  Barbara Höhle,et al.  THE ROLE OF PROSODY ON THE PERCEPTION OF WORD-ORDER DIFFERENCES BY 14-MONTH-OLD GERMAN INFANTS , 2007 .

[11]  A. Friederici.  Processing local transitions versus long-distance syntactic hierarchies , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[12]  Morten H. Christiansen,et al.  When Less is Less and When Less is More: Starting Small with Staged Input , 2003 .

[13]  A. Reber.  Implicit learning of artificial grammars , 1967 .

[14]  A. Rey,et al.  Does the mastery of center-embedded linguistic structures distinguish humans from nonhuman primates? , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[15]  Morten H. Christiansen,et al.  Modality-constrained statistical learning of tactile, visual, and auditory sequences. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[16]  A. Rey,et al.  Centre-embedded structures are a by-product of associative learning and working memory constraints: Evidence from baboons (Papio Papio) , 2012, Cognition.

[17]  Jun Lai,et al.  The impact of adjacent-dependencies and staged-input on the learnability of center-embedded hierarchical structures , 2011, Cognition.

[18]  Janne von Koss Torkildsen,et al.  Advancing Our Understanding of the Link between Statistical Learning and Language Acquisition: The Need for Longitudinal Data , 2012, Front. Psychology.

[19]  R. Gómez.  Variability and Detection of Invariant Structure , 2002, Psychological science.

[20]  Pienie Zwitserlood,et al.  Syntactic structure and artificial grammar learning: The learnability of embedded hierarchical structures , 2008, Cognition.

[21]  J. Vroomen,et al.  The Roles of Word Stress and Vowel Harmony in Speech Segmentation , 1998 .

[22]  Emiel Krahmer,et al.  The learnability of Auditory Center-embedded Recursion , 2015, CogSci.

[23]  W. Fitch,et al.  Computational Constraints on Syntactic Processing in a Nonhuman Primate , 2004, Science.

[24]  Emiel Krahmer,et al.  Studying Frequency Effects in Learning Center-embedded Recursion , 2014, CogSci.

[25]  Michael C. Corballis,et al.  Recursion, Language, and Starlings , 2007, Cogn. Sci..

[26]  Anne Cutler,et al.  The role of strong syllables in segmentation for lexical access , 1988 .

[27]  Zoltan Dienes,et al.  The nature of the memory buffer in implicit learning: Learning Chinese tonal symmetries , 2013, Consciousness and Cognition.

[28]  J. Saffran,et al.  The Infant's Auditory World: Hearing, Speech, and the Beginnings of Language , 2007 .

[29]  Vitor C. Zimmerer,et al.  Individual behavior in learning of an artificial grammar , 2011, Memory & cognition.

[30]  G. Bidelman,et al.  Tone Language Speakers and Musicians Share Enhanced Perceptual and Cognitive Abilities for Musical Pitch: Evidence for Bidirectionality between the Domains of Language and Music , 2013, PloS one.