Upland and Coasta in a Chesapea Sediment Sources ce Bay Estuary

Rapid sedimentation in the upper and central portions of tributary estuaries of the Chesapeake Bay typically has been attrib- uted to clearing of land and subsequent up- land erosion since European settlement. New data from the South River, Maryland and re- examination of existing literature suggest that coastal erosion may be the dominant process driving sediment inputs along the entire length of many tributary estuaries of the Chesapeake over the past several centuries. Shoreline ero- sion rates derived from historical shoreline maps and aerial photographs, coupled with information on fluvial inputs obtained from sediment rating curves, indicate that coastal contributions to the estuarine sediment bud- get of the South River are 4 to 12 times higher than fluvial inputs. Rates of subtidal accu- mulation estimated from pollen and 21aPb dat- ing of cores and changes in estuarine bathym- etry suggest that most sediment from streams is trapped in river mouth marshes and subtidal storage within 1 km of river mouths. Sediment inputs from streams therefore have little di- rect effect on sediment accumulation in the majority of the South River estuary. These findings imply that existing runoff-based ef- forts to control estuarine sedimentation also need to include nonstructural measures to re- duce shoreline erosion in order to alleviate sediment-related problems in tributary estu- aries of the western Chesapeake.

[1]  D. Chobanov [Land and people]. , 1992, Naselenie.

[2]  S. Leatherman,et al.  Historical Shoreline Change: Error Analysis and Mapping Accuracy , 1991 .

[3]  M. Kearney,et al.  Island Land Loss and Marsh Vertical Accretion Rate Evidence for Historical Sea-Level Changes in Chesapeake Bay , 1991 .

[4]  L. James Sustained Storage and Transport of Hydraulic Gold Mining Sediment in the Bear River, California , 1989 .

[5]  F. Oldfield,et al.  A Multivariate Mixing Model for Identifying Sediment Source from Magnetic Measurements , 1989, Quaternary Research.

[6]  W. Graf Late Holocene sediment storage in canyons of the Colorado Plateau , 1987 .

[7]  R. Huggett,et al.  Contaminants in Chesapeake Bay: The Regional Perspective , 1987 .

[8]  A. Miller Shore erosion as a sediment source to the tidal Potomac River, Maryland and Virginia , 1987 .

[9]  L. Ward,et al.  VERTICAL ACCRETION IN MARSHES WITH VARYING RATES OF SEA LEVEL RISE , 1986 .

[10]  G. Brush Patterns of recent sediment accumulation in Chesapeake Bay (Virginia—Maryland, U.S.A.) tributaries , 1984 .

[11]  R. H. Meade Sources, Sinks, and Storage of River Sediment in the Atlantic Drainage of the United States , 1982, The Journal of Geology.

[12]  R. DeFries,et al.  Spatial distributions of pollen in surface sediments of the Potomac estuary1 , 1981 .

[13]  W. A. Richkus,et al.  Environmental Atlas of the Potomac Estuary , 1980 .

[14]  William L. Graf,et al.  MINING AND CHANNEL RESPONSE , 1979 .

[15]  W. Dietrich,et al.  Sediment budget for a small catchment in mountainous terrain , 1978 .

[16]  H. H. Carter,et al.  SUSPENDED SEDIMENT BUDGET FOR CHESAPEAKE BAY , 1977 .

[17]  J. Knox VALLEY ALLUVIATION IN SOUTHWESTERN WISCONSIN , 1972 .

[18]  R. B. Biggs Sources and distribution of suspended sediment in northern Chesapeake Bay , 1970 .

[19]  W. W. Flynn The determination of low levels of polonium-210 in environmental materials. , 1968, Analytica chimica acta.

[20]  M. Wolman,et al.  Effects of construction on fluvial sediment, urban and suburban areas of Maryland , 1967 .

[21]  K. Faegri,et al.  Textbook of Pollen Analysis , 1965 .

[22]  D. F. Ball,et al.  LOSS-ON-IGNITION AS AN ESTIMATE OF ORGANIC MATTER AND ORGANIC CARBON IN NON-CALCAREOUS SOILS , 1964 .

[23]  D. Livingstone A Lightweight Piston Sampler for Lake Deposits , 1955 .

[24]  L. C. Gottschalk,et al.  Effects of Soil Erosion on Navigation in Upper Chesapeake Bay , 1945 .