Priming and sentence context support listening to noise-vocoded speech by younger and older adults.

Older adults are known to benefit from supportive context in order to compensate for age-related reductions in perceptual and cognitive processing, including when comprehending spoken language in adverse listening conditions. In the present study, we examine how younger and older adults benefit from two types of contextual support, predictability from sentence context and priming, when identifying target words in noise-vocoded sentences. In the first part of the experiment, benefit from context based on primarily semantic knowledge was evaluated by comparing the accuracy of identification of sentence-final target words that were either highly predictable or not predictable from the sentence context. In the second part of the experiment, benefit from priming was evaluated by comparing the accuracy of identification of target words when noise-vocoded sentences were either primed or not by the presentation of the sentence context without noise vocoding and with the target word replaced with white noise. Younger and older adults benefited from each type of supportive context, with the most benefit realized when both types were combined. Supportive context reduced the number of noise-vocoded bands needed for 50% word identification more for older adults than their younger counterparts.

[1]  C L Mackersie,et al.  The role of sequential stream segregation and frequency selectivity in the perception of simultaneous sentences by listeners with sensorineural hearing loss. , 2001, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[2]  W. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  The temporal structure of spoken language understanding , 1980, Cognition.

[3]  Martin Fn,et al.  Current trends in audiometric practices. , 1971 .

[4]  B. Schneider,et al.  Implications of perceptual deterioration for cognitive aging research. , 2000 .

[5]  M F Dorman,et al.  The Identification of Consonants and Vowels by Cochlear Implant Patients Using a 6‐Channel Continuous Interleaved Sampling Processor and by Normal‐Hearing Subjects Using Simulations of Processors with Two to Nine Channels , 1998, Ear and hearing.

[6]  M. Kathleen Pichora-Fuller,et al.  Effects of aging on auditory processing of speech , 2003, International journal of audiology.

[7]  Fergus I. M. Craik,et al.  A functional account of age differences in memory , 2016 .

[8]  M. Pitt,et al.  The use of rhythm in attending to speech. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[9]  Elissa L. Newport,et al.  Segmenting nonsense: an event-related potential index of perceived onsets in continuous speech , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[10]  R L Freyman,et al.  The role of perceived spatial separation in the unmasking of speech. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  Liang Li,et al.  Does the information content of an irrelevant source differentially affect spoken word recognition in younger and older adults? , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[12]  The use of rhythm in attending to speech. , 1990 .

[13]  A. Wingfield,et al.  Hearing Loss in Older Adulthood , 2005 .

[14]  A Wingfield,et al.  Cognitive factors in auditory performance: context, speed of processing, and constraints of memory. , 1996, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[15]  B. Scholl Objects and attention: the state of the art , 2001, Cognition.

[16]  S. Rosen Temporal information in speech: acoustic, auditory and linguistic aspects. , 1992, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[17]  J. Gallacher Hearing, cognitive impairment and aging: a critical review , 2005 .

[18]  P W Alberti,et al.  Auditory detection, discrimination and speech processing in ageing, noise-sensitive and hearing-impaired listeners. , 1990, Scandinavian audiology.

[19]  A. Wingfield,et al.  Cognitive supports and cognitive constraints on comprehension of spoken language. , 2007, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[20]  R. Cabeza Hemispheric asymmetry reduction in older adults: the HAROLD model. , 2002, Psychology and aging.

[21]  F. Craik,et al.  On the Transfer of Information from Temporary to Permanent Memory [and Discussion] , 1983 .

[22]  Lisa D. Sanders,et al.  An ERP study of continuous speech processing. I. Segmentation, semantics, and syntax in native speakers. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[23]  C Alain,et al.  Age-related changes in detecting a mistuned harmonic. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[24]  Dawn G. Blasko,et al.  Similarity Mapping in Spoken Word Recognition , 1997 .

[25]  M. Besson,et al.  Semantic, repetition and rime priming between spoken words: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence , 1998, Biological Psychology.

[26]  W. H. Sumby,et al.  Visual contribution to speech intelligibility in noise , 1954 .

[27]  Jean-Pierre Gagné,et al.  Auditory, visual and audiovisual clear speech , 2002, Speech Commun..

[28]  M. Kathleen Pichora-Fuller,et al.  Cognitive aging and auditory information processing , 2003, International journal of audiology.

[29]  L L Elliott,et al.  Development of a test of speech intelligibility in noise using sentence materials with controlled word predictability. , 1977, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[30]  Bruce A. Schneider,et al.  Age-Related Changes in Temporal Processing: Implications for Speech Perception , 2001 .

[31]  P C Loizou,et al.  On the number of channels needed to understand speech. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[32]  P. Reuter-Lorenz New visions of the aging mind and brain , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[33]  A R Horwitz,et al.  Use of context by young and aged adults with normal hearing. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[34]  Martin Fn,et al.  The present status of audiometric practice: a follow-up study. , 1978 .

[35]  D J Van Tasell,et al.  Temporal cues for consonant recognition: training, talker generalization, and use in evaluation of cochlear implants. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[36]  M. Pichora-Fuller,et al.  Effect of age on F0 difference limen and concurrent vowel identification. , 2007, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[37]  P C Gordon,et al.  Lexical and prelexical influences on word segmentation: evidence from priming. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[38]  D. D. Greenwood A cochlear frequency-position function for several species--29 years later. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[39]  B A Schneider,et al.  Gap detection and the precedence effect in young and old adults. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[40]  R V Shannon,et al.  Speech Recognition with Primarily Temporal Cues , 1995, Science.

[41]  L. L. Elliott,et al.  Verbal auditory closure and the speech perception in noise (SPIN) Test. , 1995, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[42]  D. Frisina,et al.  Relationships among age-related differences in gap detection and word recognition. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[43]  M R Leek,et al.  FO processing and the separation of competing speech signals by listeners with normal hearing and with hearing loss. , 1998, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[44]  S. Gordon-Salant,et al.  Selected cognitive factors and speech recognition performance among young and elderly listeners. , 1997, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[45]  B. Schneider,et al.  Effect of age, presentation method, and learning on identification of noise-vocoded words. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[46]  W. M. Rabinowitz,et al.  Standardization of a test of speech perception in noise. , 1979, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[47]  C. Grady Functional brain imaging and age-related changes in cognition , 2000, Biological Psychology.

[48]  P. Souza,et al.  Combining temporal-envelope cues across channels: effects of age and hearing loss. , 2006, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[49]  Richard L Freyman,et al.  Effect of number of masking talkers and auditory priming on informational masking in speech recognition. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[50]  Victor S Ferreira,et al.  Phonological Influences on Lexical (Mis)Selection , 2003, Psychological science.

[51]  S. Goldinger,et al.  Form-based priming in spoken word recognition: the roles of competition and bias. , 1992, Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory and Cognition.

[52]  A. Wingfield,et al.  Contextual encoding by young and elderly adults as revealed by cued and free recall , 1994 .

[53]  R L Freyman,et al.  Spatial release from informational masking in speech recognition. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[54]  M Kathleen Pichora-Fuller,et al.  Effect of age on detection of gaps in speech and nonspeech markers varying in duration and spectral symmetry. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[55]  A Boothroyd,et al.  Speech recognition with reduced spectral cues as a function of age. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[56]  F. N. Martin,et al.  The present status of audiometric practice: a follow-up study. , 1978, ASHA.

[57]  Matthew H. Davis,et al.  Lexical information drives perceptual learning of distorted speech: evidence from the comprehension of noise-vocoded sentences. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[58]  Lisa D. Sanders,et al.  An ERP study of continuous speech processing. II. Segmentation, semantics, and syntax in non-native speakers. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[59]  Daniel E. Hack Auditory Processing of Speech: The COG Effect , 2004 .

[60]  Ann Cutler,et al.  Prosody in the Comprehension of Spoken Language: A Literature Review , 1997, Language and speech.

[61]  M. Sommers,et al.  Inhibitory processes and spoken word recognition in young and older adults: the interaction of lexical competition and semantic context. , 1999, Psychology and aging.

[62]  R. Schvaneveldt,et al.  Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words: evidence of a dependence between retrieval operations. , 1971, Journal of experimental psychology.

[63]  J. G. Martin Rhythmic and segmental perception are not independent. , 1979, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[64]  Gurjit Singh,et al.  Effects of Age on Auditory and Cognitive Processing: Implications for Hearing Aid Fitting and Audiologic Rehabilitation , 2006, Trends in amplification.

[65]  S. Blumstein,et al.  The effect of subphonetic differences on lexical access , 1994, Cognition.

[66]  M. Daneman,et al.  How young and old adults listen to and remember speech in noise. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.