Us'em: The user-centered design of a device for motivating stroke patients to use their impaired arm-hand in daily life activities

Stroke leaves the majority of its survivors with an impairment of the upper extremity that affects their ability to live independently and their quality of life. Rehabilitation research shows that practice of everyday life activities in a natural context may sustain or even improve arm-hand performance, even during chronic stages after stroke. Based on this insight we designed, developed and evaluated Us'em; this consists of two watch-like accelerometry devices that provide feedback to stroke patients regarding the usage of their impaired versus their non-affected upper extremity. System usability and treatment credibility/expectancy were evaluated positively by therapists and patients.

[1]  Lippincott Williams Wilkins,et al.  Stroke--1989. Recommendations on stroke prevention, diagnosis, and therapy. Report of the WHO Task Force on Stroke and other Cerebrovascular Disorders. , 1989, Stroke.

[2]  Ralph L. Sacco,et al.  Stroke Outcome in Clinical Trial Patients Deriving From Different Countries , 2009, Stroke.

[3]  G. Devilly,et al.  Psychometric properties of the credibility / expectancy questionnaire q , 2000 .

[4]  J. Eng,et al.  A community-based upper-extremity group exercise program improves motor function and performance of functional activities in chronic stroke: a randomized controlled trial. , 2006, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[5]  E. Taub,et al.  A telerehabilitation approach to delivery of constraint-induced movement therapy. , 2006, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[6]  A. Timmermans,et al.  Sensor-Based Arm Skill Training in Chronic Stroke Patients: Results on Treatment Outcome, Patient Motivation, and System Usability , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[7]  A. Karduna,et al.  The reliability of side to side measurements of upper extremity activity levels in healthy subjects , 2010, BMC musculoskeletal disorders.

[8]  Subashan Perera,et al.  Persisting Consequences of Stroke Measured by the Stroke Impact Scale , 2002, Stroke.

[9]  J. P. Miller,et al.  Effect of constraint-induced movement therapy on upper extremity function 3 to 9 months after stroke: the EXCITE randomized clinical trial. , 2006, JAMA.

[10]  J. Bussmann,et al.  The stroke upper-limb activity monitor: its sensitivity to measure hemiplegic upper-limb activity during daily life. , 2007, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[11]  S. Engelborghs,et al.  Monitoring of physical activity after stroke: a systematic review of accelerometry-based measures. , 2010, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[12]  E. Taub,et al.  The learned nonuse phenomenon: implications for rehabilitation. , 2006, Europa medicophysica.

[13]  G. Kwakkel,et al.  The impact of physical therapy on functional outcomes after stroke: what's the evidence? , 2004, Clinical rehabilitation.

[14]  P. Clark,et al.  Factors Influencing Stroke Survivors' Quality of Life During Subacute Recovery , 2005, Stroke.

[15]  Paul A Thompson,et al.  Retention of upper limb function in stroke survivors who have received constraint-induced movement therapy: the EXCITE randomised trial , 2008, The Lancet Neurology.

[16]  J. H. van der Lee,et al.  Forced use of the upper extremity in chronic stroke patients: results from a single-blind randomized clinical trial. , 1999, Stroke.

[17]  Francine Malouin,et al.  Chapter 9 – Assessment and training of locomotion after stroke: evolving concepts , 2005 .

[18]  Saul Greenberg,et al.  Phidgets: easy development of physical interfaces through physical widgets , 2001, UIST '01.

[19]  A. Timmermans,et al.  Influence of Task-Oriented Training Content on Skilled Arm-Hand Performance in Stroke: A Systematic Review , 2010, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[20]  A. Prevo,et al.  The long-term outcome of arm function after stroke: results of a follow-up study. , 1999, Disability and rehabilitation.

[21]  Olivier Rouaud,et al.  Epidemiology of stroke in Europe: Geographic and environmental differences , 2007, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[22]  C. Wolfe,et al.  The impact of stroke. , 2000, British medical bulletin.

[23]  S. Tyson,et al.  Discharge and follow-up for people with stroke: what happens and why , 2000, Clinical rehabilitation.

[24]  P. Langhorne,et al.  Motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review , 2009, The Lancet Neurology.

[25]  E. Taub,et al.  A Placebo-Controlled Trial of Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy for Upper Extremity After Stroke , 2006, Stroke.

[26]  N. Hogan,et al.  Effects of robotic therapy on motor impairment and recovery in chronic stroke. , 2003, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[27]  J. Annesi,et al.  Effects of Computer Feedback on Adherence to Exercise , 1998, Perceptual and motor skills.

[28]  Ann Johansson,et al.  Activities of daily living among St Petersburg women after mild stroke. , 2007, Occupational therapy international.

[29]  G. Wulf,et al.  Extrinsic feedback for motor learning after stroke: What is the evidence? , 2006, Disability and rehabilitation.

[30]  A. Timmermans,et al.  Technology-assisted training of arm-hand skills in stroke: concepts on reacquisition of motor control and therapist guidelines for rehabilitation technology design , 2009, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[31]  B. J. Fogg,et al.  Persuasive technology: using computers to change what we think and do , 2002, UBIQ.

[32]  Richard A. Magill,et al.  The Influence of Augmented Feedback on Skill Learning Depends on Characteristics of the Skill and the Learner , 1994 .

[33]  Gitendra Uswatte,et al.  Ambulatory monitoring of arm movement using accelerometry: an objective measure of upper-extremity rehabilitation in persons with chronic stroke. , 2005, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.