BLASTO: a tool for searching orthologous groups

We present BLAST on Orthologous groups (BLASTO), a modified BLAST tool for searching orthologous group data. It treats each orthologous group as a unit and outputs a ranked list of orthologous groups instead of single sequences. By filtering out redundancy and putative paralogs, sequence comparisons to orthologous groups, instead of to single sequences in the database, can improve both functional prediction and phylogenetic inference. BLASTO computes the significance score of each orthologous group based on the individual BLAST hits in the orthologous group, using the number of taxa in the group as an optional weight. This allows users to control the species diversity of the orthologous groups. BLASTO incorporates the best-known multispecies ortholog databases, including NCBI Clusters of Orthologous Group, NCBI euKaryotic Orthologous Group database, OrthoMCL, MultiParanoid and TIGR Eukaryotic Gene Orthologues database, and offers a useful platform to integrate orthology information into functional inference and evolutionary studies of individual sequences. BLASTO is accessible online at http://oxytricha.princeton.edu/BlastO.

[1]  T. Cavalier-smith,et al.  Rooting the tree of life by transition analyses , 2006, Biology Direct.

[2]  G. Pertea,et al.  Cross-referencing eukaryotic genomes: TIGR Orthologous Gene Alignments (TOGA). , 2002, Genome research.

[3]  J A Eisen,et al.  Phylogenomics: improving functional predictions for uncharacterized genes by evolutionary analysis. , 1998, Genome research.

[4]  C. Berney,et al.  How many novel eukaryotic 'kingdoms'? Pitfalls and limitations of environmental DNA surveys , 2004, BMC Biology.

[5]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  Protein Molecular Function Prediction by Bayesian Phylogenomics , 2005, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[6]  L. Hug,et al.  The origin and diversification of eukaryotes: problems with molecular phylogenetics and molecular clock estimation , 2006, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[7]  W. Fitch.  Uses for evolutionary trees. , 1995, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[8]  S. Karlin,et al.  Methods for assessing the statistical significance of molecular sequence features by using general scoring schemes. , 1990, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  Gang Liu,et al.  Automatic clustering of orthologs and inparalogs shared by multiple proteomes , 2006, ISMB.

[10]  D. Lipman,et al.  A genomic perspective on protein families. , 1997, Science.

[11]  B Franz Lang,et al.  The tree of eukaryotes. , 2005, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[12]  Erik L. L. Sonnhammer,et al.  Automated ortholog inference from phylogenetic trees and calculation of orthology reliability , 2002, Bioinform..

[13]  P. Bork,et al.  Predicting functions from protein sequences—where are the bottlenecks? , 1998, Nature Genetics.

[14]  Darren A. Natale,et al.  The COG database: an updated version includes eukaryotes , 2003, BMC Bioinformatics.

[15]  Sean R. Eddy,et al.  RIO: Analyzing proteomes by automated phylogenomics using resampled inference of orthologs , 2002, BMC Bioinformatics.

[16]  S. Baldauf,et al.  The Deep Roots of Eukaryotes , 2003, Science.

[17]  W. Doolittle,et al.  A kingdom-level phylogeny of eukaryotes based on combined protein data. , 2000, Science.

[18]  Benjamin J. Raphael,et al.  The Sorcerer II Global Ocean Sampling Expedition: Expanding the Universe of Protein Families , 2007, PLoS biology.

[19]  Rodrigo Lopez,et al.  Multiple sequence alignment with the Clustal series of programs , 2003, Nucleic Acids Res..

[20]  Feng Chen,et al.  OrthoMCL-DB: querying a comprehensive multi-species collection of ortholog groups , 2005, Nucleic Acids Res..