Behavioral Tracking Tools, Regulation, and Corporate Social Responsibility in Online Gambling

Over the last decade the gambling market has changed dramatically. There are now increased opportunities to gamble almost anywhere and at any time via Internet and mobile phone technology. This article briefly focuses on corporate social responsibility in online gambling. Online gambling is regulated differently across the world. For instance, there is no European-wide regulation of Internet gambling and it is up to individual member states to decide whether to allow online gambling in their territory and to whom they will grant operating licenses. The same is also true for the USA. There are an increasing number of countries that have legalized online gambling. For example, Denmark has issued more than 30 online gambling licenses. In addition to state-licensed operators (that typically can only offer games to citizens within their jurisdiction), there are large numbers of operators located in places like Malta or Gibraltar that offer their online games to everyone worldwide. Such operators only have to adhere to the responsible gaming standards in one jurisdiction (e.g., Malta, Gibraltar), even though they operate globally. Only recently have various states in the European Union regulated their online gaming market. For instance, Italy has entrusted the governmental agency AAMS (Amministrazione Autonoma dei Monopoli Stado—Autonomous Administration of the State Monopolies) with all gaming-related matters. The AAMS is responsible for issuing gaming licenses and for enforcing all legal aspects of gambling. Consequently, Italy has shifted from banning all online gaming into being a regulated market where online gambling is offered by private organizations but monitored by a governmental body. Another example of partial regulation is currently in progress in Germany. Under a newly ratified law, 20 online sports betting licenses will be issued. Online casino gambling, on the other hand, will still not be allowed under nationwide German law. However several federal German states have different laws regarding online gambling, which has led to major legal confusion over the past year. Part of this confusion is due to the federal organization of Germany. In 2012, Delaware became the first state to enter legal online casino gambling in the USA. The legislation allows all types of online games, such as slots, roulette, blackjack, and poker. These recent U.S. developments stand in stark contrast to the Unlawful Internet Gambing Enforcement Act that was signed by George Bush in 2006. After its introduction, it changed the online gambling market, as many big operators (e.g., Party Gaming, 888) left the U.S. market. State-licensed operators are not only restricted in who can play their games, but must also follow specific responsible gaming procedures as laid down by

[1]  K. Kypri,et al.  Feedback from recently returned veterans on an anonymous web-based brief alcohol intervention , 2012, Addiction Science & Clinical Practice.

[2]  N. Martin,et al.  Pathological gambling recovery in the absence of abstinence. , 2010, Addiction.

[3]  Alex Blaszczynski,et al.  Electronic Gaming Machine Warning Messages: Information versus Self-Evaluation , 2009, The Journal of psychology.

[4]  Katherine M. Diskin,et al.  A randomized controlled trial of a single session motivational intervention for concerned gamblers. , 2009, Behaviour research and therapy.

[5]  Alex Blaszczynski,et al.  Recall of electronic gaming machine signs: A static versus a dynamic mode of presentation , 2007 .

[6]  M. Griffiths A Case Study of Binge Problem Gambling , 2006, International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction.

[7]  Serge Sévigny,et al.  Responsible Gambling Tools: Pop-Up Messages and Pauses on Video Lottery Terminals , 2006, The Journal of psychology.

[8]  J. Krejci,et al.  Motivational interviewing with personalized feedback: a brief intervention for motivating smokers with schizophrenia to seek treatment for tobacco dependence. , 2004, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[9]  Alex Blaszczynski,et al.  Binge Gambling: A Neglected Concept , 2003 .

[10]  J. Prochaska,et al.  Stages and processes of self-change of smoking: toward an integrative model of change. , 1983, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[11]  Griffiths,et al.  Limit setting and player choice in most intense online gamblers: an empirical study of online gambling behaviour , 2013 .

[12]  H. Lesieur,et al.  The South Oaks Gambling Screen (SaGS): A New Instrument for the Identification of Pathological Gamblers , 2010 .

[13]  Griffiths,et al.  Online behavioural tracking in Internet gambling research: ethical and methodological issues , 2010 .

[14]  Sally Monaghan,et al.  Responsible gambling strategies for Internet gambling: The theoretical and empirical base of using pop-up messages to encourage self-awareness , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[15]  J. Prochaska Why Don't People Change? , 1993 .

[16]  W. Miller,et al.  Motivational Interviewing: Preparing People to Change Addictive Behavior , 1991 .