Correct Voting Across Thirty-Three Democracies: A Preliminary Analysis

This article extends Lau and Redlawsk's notion of correct voting – whether voters, under conditions of uncertainty, choose the alternative they would have chosen had they been fully informed about the issues and candidates in that election – to sixty-nine elections in thirty-three established and emerging democracies around the world. At the individual level, political sophistication, political experience and motivation all significantly predict the probability of casting a correct vote. However several institutional factors proved to be even more important. In particular, elections with more parties running – and settings that encourage candidate-centred voting – decrease the probability of correct voting, while more ideologically distinctive alternatives, clearer lines of responsibility and greater media access to information are associated with higher rates of correct voting.

[1]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  The adaptive decision maker , 1993 .

[2]  M. Lewis-Beck.  Economics and Elections: The Major Western Democracies , 1988 .

[3]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  Adaptive Strategy Selection in Decision Making. , 1988 .

[4]  Political consequences of German unification , 1992 .

[5]  R. Teixeira,et al.  The Disappearing American Voter , 1992 .

[6]  Brad T. Gomez,et al.  Political Sophistication and Economic Voting in the American Electorate: A Theory of Heterogeneous Attribution , 2001 .

[7]  Gary W. Cox,et al.  Making Votes Count: Strategic Coordination in the World's Electoral Systems , 1997 .

[8]  John W. Payne,et al.  Effort and Accuracy in Choice , 1985 .

[9]  Matt Golder,et al.  Principles of Comparative Politics , 2008 .

[10]  Randolph T. Stevenson,et al.  The Economic Vote: How Political and Economic Institutions Condition Election Results , 2008 .

[11]  David J. Andersen,et al.  An Exploration of Correct Voting in Recent U.S. Presidential Elections , 2008 .

[12]  M. Duverger.  Political Parties Their Organization and Activity in the Modern State , 1964 .

[13]  Carole J. Wilson.  Consideration Sets and Political Choices: A Heterogeneous Model of Vote Choice and Sub-national Party Strength , 2008 .

[14]  M. Marsiske,et al.  Everyday Problem Solving and Decision Making , 2006 .

[15]  Barbara G. Farah,et al.  Party identification and party closeness in comparative perspective , 1988 .

[16]  Tim Futing Liao,et al.  Bootstrapping: A Nonparametric Approach to Statistical Inference.@@@Maximum Likelihood Estimation: Logic and Practice. , 1995 .

[17]  J. Shanteau.  How much information does an expert use? Is it relevant? , 1992 .

[18]  H. Simon,et al.  Perception in chess , 1973 .

[19]  P. Norris.  Electoral Engineering: Voting Rules and Political Behavior , 2004 .

[20]  R. Dalton,et al.  Citizens, context, and choice , 2010 .

[21]  Kira Sanbonmatsu,et al.  Gender-Related Political Knowledge and the Descriptive Representation of Women , 2003 .

[22]  John M. Carey,et al.  Incentives to cultivate a personal vote: A rank ordering of electoral formulas☆ , 1995 .

[23]  M. Wattenberg,et al.  Parties without partisans : political change in advanced industrial democracies , 2000 .

[24]  T. Patterson.  The Vanishing Voter , 2002 .

[25]  M. Wattenberg,et al.  Parties Without Partisans , 2002 .

[26]  D. Hill,et al.  The Political Consequences of Electoral Laws , 1969 .

[27]  John W. Payne,et al.  The adaptive decision maker: Name index , 1993 .

[28]  Morris P. Fiorina,et al.  Retrospective voting in American national elections , 1981 .

[29]  Jeffrey Haynes,et al.  Comparing Democracies 2. New Challenges in the Study of Elections and Voting , 2003 .

[30]  S. Keeter,et al.  What Americans Know about Politics and Why It Matters , 1996 .

[31]  Richard S. Flickinger,et al.  The disappearing voters? Exploring declining turnout in Western European elections , 1992 .

[32]  Matthew Soberg Shugart,et al.  Presidents and Assemblies: Index , 1992 .

[33]  Bruno Kaufmann,et al.  Direct democracy in Europe : a comprehensive reference guide to the initiative and referendum process in Europe , 2004 .

[34]  W. P. Shively,et al.  Who represents us best?: one member or many? , 2009 .

[35]  Jonathan Nagler,et al.  A New Approach for Modelling Strategic Voting in Multiparty Elections , 2000, British Journal of Political Science.

[36]  D. Rivers.  Heterogeneity in Models of Electoral Choice , 1988 .

[37]  Russell J. Dalton.  The Quantity and the Quality of Party Systems , 2008 .

[38]  Stuart Macdonald,et al.  A Directional Theory of Issue Voting , 1989, American Political Science Review.

[39]  J. Shanteau.  Psychological characteristics and strategies of expert decision makers , 1988 .

[40]  G. Powell.  American Voter Turnout in Comparative Perspective , 1986, American Political Science Review.

[41]  R. Dahl,et al.  Democracy and Its Critics , 1990 .

[42]  Stuart Macdonald,et al.  Ideology and party support in comparative perspective , 1994 .

[43]  D. Austen-Smith.  Sincere voting in models of legislative elections , 1989 .

[44]  Selection, optimization, and compensation as strategies of life management: Correlations with subjective indicators of successful aging. , 1998 .

[45]  S. Huntington.  The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century , 1991 .

[46]  R. Duch,et al.  Heterogeneity in Perceptions of National Economic Conditions , 2000 .

[47]  Rein Taagepera,et al.  “Effective” Number of Parties , 1979 .

[48]  Gábor Tóka.  Citizen information, election outcomes and good governance , 2008 .